Modelling design development performance

Begins with a brief review of research in the area of performance, with particular emphasis on design and product development, highlighting the main weaknesses in work to date. Then presents a fundamental and generic model of performance, related to knowledge‐based activities in design, which describes performance in terms of its key elements, efficiency and effectiveness, and provides a basis for modelling performance across different process levels. Evolves this model further to describe performance measurement and management in design development. Concludes that it is not possible to distinguish the efficiency of the design activity from that of design management, and that, in addition, efficiency appears to be inherent to an activity, but is difficult to measure.

[1]  Y. L. Doz New product development effectiveness: a triadic comparison in the information technology industry , 1991, Technology Management : the New International Language.

[2]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[3]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[4]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[5]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Analysing design activity , 1996 .

[6]  Judy Pearsall,et al.  The Concise Oxford Dictionary , 1999 .

[7]  Alex H. B. Duffy The Design Productivity Debate , 1997 .

[8]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Integrated Product Development , 1987 .

[9]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[11]  Anna Hart,et al.  Knowledge acquisition for expert systems , 1988 .

[12]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[13]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Managing Engineering Design , 1994 .

[14]  Paul A. Emmanuelides,et al.  Towards an integrative framework of performance in product development projects , 1993 .

[15]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Effective process management through performance measurement , 1995 .

[16]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Modelling—The Language of the Designer , 1994 .

[17]  Rene Cordero,et al.  The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview , 1990 .

[18]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[19]  Andrew Cooke,et al.  Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes , 1997 .

[20]  Bj Osol,et al.  A methodology for industrial studies of productivity performance , 1993 .

[21]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Modelling performance behaviour , 2001 .

[22]  Ray W. Baines,et al.  A state of the art review of IDEFO , 1993 .

[23]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Measuring the performance of product introduction , 1998 .

[24]  A. Neely The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? , 1999 .

[25]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[26]  Asbjørn Rolstadås,et al.  Enterprise performance measurement , 1998 .

[27]  Richard Dwight,et al.  Searching for real maintenance performance measures , 1999 .

[28]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[29]  Andy Neely,et al.  Getting the measure of your business , 2002 .

[30]  Harlow B. Cohen The performance paradox , 1998 .