TESTING THE CONTINGENCY 'FIT' BETWEEN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS AND MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE: A RESEARCH NOTE ON THE MODERATING ROLE OF TOLERANCE FOR AMBIGUITY

Abstract This study examines the moderating effect of tolerance for ambiguity, a personality variable, on the relation between management accounting systems (MAS) design and managerial performance. MAS design was defined in terms of the extent to which managers» use of broad scope MAS information for managerial decision making. The responses of 63 managers, drawn from a cross-section of Australian manufacturing companies, to a questionnaire survey were analysed by using a multiple regression technique. The results indicate that the use of broad scope MAS information interact with tolerance for ambiguity to affect managerial performance. The results indicate that an appropriate «fit» between manager's personality variable of tolerance for ambiguity and the extent of use of broad scope MAS information for managerial decisions will lead to improved managerial performance.

[1]  Jan H. B. M. Huysmans,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Cognitive-Style Constraint in Implementing Operations Research Proposals , 1970 .

[2]  E. Prien,et al.  ASSESSMENTS OF HIGHER-LEVEL PERSONNEL: III. RATING CRITERIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SUPERVISOR RATINGS AND INCUMBENT SELF-RATINGS OF JOB PERFORMANCE , 1962 .

[3]  P. Allison.  Testing for Interaction in Multiple Regression , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  V. Govindarajan.  Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable☆ , 1984 .

[5]  Robert M. Kaplan.  Basic Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1986 .

[6]  K. Ferris,et al.  Perspectives on Accounting Systems and Human Behaviour , 1988 .

[7]  Eric G. Flamholtz,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE REPLACEMENT COST NUMBERS, COGNITIVE INFORMATION PROCESSING, AND PERSONNEL DECISIONS: A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT , 1978 .

[8]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[9]  David N. Ricchiute,et al.  Ambiguity intolerance and financial reporting alternatives , 1981 .

[10]  Yew Chia,et al.  DECENTRALIZATION, MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM (MAS) INFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR INTERACTION EFFECTS ON MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE: A SINGAPORE STUDY , 1995 .

[11]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[12]  Susan T. Rydell,et al.  Measurement and Some Correlates of Need-Cognition , 1966, Psychological reports.

[13]  J. Tsui.  Tolerance for Ambiguity, Uncertainty Audit Qualifications and Bankers' Perceptions , 1993 .

[14]  Jr. A. P. Mac Donald,et al.  Revised Scale for Ambiguity Tolerance: Reliability and Validity , 1970 .

[15]  S. Budner.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[16]  Alan S. Dunk,et al.  TASK UNCERTAINTY AND ITS INTERACTION WITH BUDGETARY PARTICIPATION AND BUDGET EMPHASIS: SOME... , 1991 .

[17]  H. G. Heneman,et al.  Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. , 1974 .

[18]  F. Gul.  Tolerance for Ambiguity, Auditors' Opinions and Their Effects on Decision Making , 1986 .

[19]  I. Eggleton,et al.  The impact of reliance on accounting performance measures on job-related tension and managerial performance: Additional evidence , 1995 .

[20]  Vincent K. Chong,et al.  Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note , 1996 .

[21]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance , 1985 .

[22]  F. Gul,et al.  The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction , 1994 .

[23]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[24]  George C. Thornton,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISORY- AND SELF-APPRAISALS OF EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE , 1968 .

[25]  K. E. Southwood.  Substantive Theory and Statistical Interaction: Five Models , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Cameron Guthrie,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE “FIT”BETWEEN STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN , 1994 .