Computerized mirror therapy with augmented reflection technology for stroke rehabilitation: A feasibility study in a rehabilitation center

New rehabilitation strategies for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation employing visual stimulation show promising results. Cost-efficient ways to provide these techniques are still a challenge. Virtual and Augmented Reality Technologies could be suitable for this endeavor. Recent technological advances often are not translated into therapeutic practice and improved outcomes for patients because of a lack of research on their practical usage, coupled with the inexistence of appropriate guidelines and protocols. Here we present a novel and affordable augmented reality system that was developed and evaluated in combination with a validated mirror therapy protocol for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. We evaluated the components of the therapeutic intervention from both the patients' and the therapists' points of view. In particular, we provide evidence that the combination and application of the Berlin Protocol for Mirror Therapy together with Augmented Reflection Technology is feasible for clinical use. This paves the way to a broader use of technically-supported mirror therapy with the possibility of higher therapy frequencies and enhanced recovery for patients.

[1]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Adapting an immersive virtual reality system for rehabilitation , 2003, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[2]  R. Teasell,et al.  Are Recommendations Regarding Inpatient Therapy Intensity Following Acute Stroke Really Evidence-Based? , 2012, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[3]  Michael Minge,et al.  meCUE - Ein modularer Fragebogen zur Erfassung des Nutzungserlebens , 2013, MuC.

[4]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Manipulating the Experience of Reality for Rehabilitation Applications , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Patient engagement and clinical feasibility of Augmented Reflection Technology for stroke rehabilitation , 2014 .

[6]  J. Fung,et al.  Navigating and shopping in a complex virtual urban mall to evaluate cognitive functions , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR).

[7]  Nicole Grünert-Plüss,et al.  Mirror Therapy in Hand Rehabilitation: A Review of the Literature, the St Gallen Protocol for Mirror Therapy and Evaluation of a Case Series of 52 Patients , 2008 .

[8]  Ye Yuan,et al.  Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR).

[9]  G. Moseley,et al.  Using graded motor imagery for complex regional pain syndrome in clinical practice: Failure to improve pain , 2012, European journal of pain.

[10]  Jorg Kruger,et al.  Visualization of virtual reality neurological motor rehabilitation of the upper limb — A systematic review , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR).

[11]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  A. Meyer-Heim,et al.  A Paediatric Interactive Therapy System for arm and hand rehabilitation , 2008, 2008 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[13]  R. Kizony,et al.  Performance within a virtual supermarket and its relationship to executive functions in post-stroke patients , 2006, 2006 International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[15]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Beyond the Looking Glass: Fooling the Brain with the Augmented Mirror Box , 2011, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[16]  M. Cameirão,et al.  Virtual reality based upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a review , 2008 .

[17]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Out of reach? — A novel AR interface approach for motor rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[18]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  Avan Aihie Sayer,et al.  A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[20]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  H. Schouten,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[22]  J. Zitzewitz,et al.  A View on VR-Enhanced Rehabilitation Robotics , 2006, 2006 International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[23]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Punching ducks for post-stroke neurorehabilitation: System design and initial exploratory feasibility study , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[24]  Ailie Turton,et al.  When should upper limb function be trained after stroke? Evidence for and against early intervention. , 2002, NeuroRehabilitation.

[25]  C. McCabe Mirror visual feedback therapy. A practical approach. , 2011, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[26]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Visual manipulations for motor rehabilitation , 2012, Comput. Graph..

[27]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  Jing Wang,et al.  Different effects of the mirror illusion on motor and somatosensory processing. , 2014, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[29]  Jens Steinbrink,et al.  Effect of a mirror-like illusion on activation in the precuneus assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Referred Sensations Elicited by Video-Mediated Mirroring of Hands , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Enhanced feedback during training in virtual versus real world environments , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[33]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  H. Karbe,et al.  Mirror Therapy Promotes Recovery From Severe Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Touching the phantom limb , 1995, Nature.

[36]  M. Levin,et al.  Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of its Effectiveness for Upper Limb Motor Recovery , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[37]  Lutz Tellmann,et al.  Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  K. Mauritz,et al.  A comparison of neural mechanisms in mirror therapy and movement observation therapy. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[39]  G. Moseley,et al.  Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain , 2006, Neurology.

[40]  Rüdiger J Seitz,et al.  Body scheme gates visual processing. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[42]  Debraj Mukherjee,et al.  Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke. , 2011, World neurosurgery.

[43]  Harry von Piekartz,et al.  Abstract virtual environment for motor rehabilitation of stroke patients with upper limb dysfunction. A pilot study , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR).

[44]  G. Moseley,et al.  Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial , 2004, Pain.

[45]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Cerebral activation evoked by the mirror illusion of the hand in stroke patients compared to normal subjects. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.