Variation in Form versus Variation in Meaning

Abstract The aim of this introductory article is to provide a background to the articles contained in this special issue of Lingua that centers around variation in form, variation in meaning, and markedness. Theoretical and empirical considerations are brought together in this special issue in which the linguistic disciplines that are covered diverge. The different contributions deal with language processing, first language acquisition, language contact, functional-typology and generative morphology and syntax. Several papers in this special issue argue in favour of an Optimality Theoretic analysis of the data under discussion. This is not a coincidence, given that Optimality Theory is claimed to be a formal theory of markedness (cf. Gilbers and De Hoop, 1998 , Lingua, 104, 1 for an introduction to OT). In Section 1 , we present two hypotheses dealing with the relation between variation in form and variation in meaning. We discuss several dimensions along which markedness of forms and meanings can be measured in Section 2 . In the final section we discuss the possibility that the concept of bidirectional optimization accounts for markedness as well as variation in form versus variation in meaning.

[1]  Denis Bouchard,et al.  The concept of ‘universal’ and the Case of Japanese☆ , 2001 .

[2]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[3]  S. Gillis,et al.  The acquisition of Dutch , 1998 .

[4]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[5]  Papers on case and agreement , 1993 .

[6]  S. Levinson Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[7]  Ursula Lenker,et al.  Ilse Wischer, Gabriele Diewald (Hrsg.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 2002. (Typological Studies in Language ; 49) , 2005 .

[8]  H. de Hoop,et al.  Conflicting constraints : An introduction to optimality theory , 1998 .

[9]  Margaretha Anna Flora Klamer,et al.  Semantically Motivated Lexical Patterns: A Study of Dutch and Kambera Expressives , 2002 .

[10]  H. de Hoop Optional Scrambling and Interpretation , 2000 .

[11]  Jerzy Kuryłowicz,et al.  The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European , 1964 .

[12]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[13]  Simin Karimi,et al.  Word order and scrambling , 2003 .

[14]  R. Schiffer Psychobiology of Language , 1986 .

[15]  B. Partee Nominal and temporal anaphora , 1984 .

[16]  S. Potter,et al.  Universals of Language , 1966 .

[17]  G. Diewald,et al.  New reflections on grammaticalization , 2002 .

[18]  S. Gillis,et al.  Dutch child language: an overview , 2001 .

[19]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[20]  Steven G Lapointe,et al.  A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasics , 1985, Brain and Language.

[21]  John Haiman,et al.  Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion , 1985 .

[22]  W. Bruce Croft Typology and Universals , 1990 .

[23]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Optimality Theory and Pragmatics , 2003 .

[24]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[25]  E. Battistella The Logic of Markedness , 1996 .

[26]  E. Williams Blocking and anaphora , 1997 .

[27]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[28]  Comrie Bernard Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[29]  J. W. Haverkort Clitics and parametrization : case studies in the interaction of head movement phenomena , 1993 .

[30]  Geert Booij,et al.  The Morphology of Dutch , 2002 .

[31]  Bernd Heine,et al.  On the role of context in grammaticalization , 2002 .

[32]  C. Bally,et al.  Mélanges de linguistique offerts à Charles Bally , 1939 .

[33]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  The Asymmetry of Optimality Theoretic Syntax and Semantics , 2000, J. Semant..

[34]  Sten Vikner,et al.  Optimality-theoretic syntax , 2001 .

[35]  Hilda Judith Koopman,et al.  The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar , 1984 .