Assessing The Relevance Of Neurophysiological Patterns To Predict Motor Imagery-based BCI Users’ Performance

Motor Imagery-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (MI-BCI) allow users to control a computer for various applications using their brain activity alone, which is usually recorded by an electroencephalogram (EEG). Although BCI applications are numerous, their use outside laboratories is still scarce due to their poor accuracy. Some users cannot use BCIs, a phenomenon sometimes called "BCI illiteracy", which impacts around 10% to 30% of BCI users, who cannot produce discriminable EEG patterns. By performing neurophysiological analyses, and notably by identifying neurophysiological predictors of BCI performance, we may understand this phenomenon and its causes better. In turn, this may also help us to better understand and thus possibly improve, BCI user training. Therefore, this paper presents statistical models dedicated to the prediction of MI-BCI user performance, based on neurophysiological users’ features extracted from a two minute EEG recording of a "relax with eyes open" condition. We consider data from 56 subjects that were recorded in a ‘relax with eyes open’ condition before performing a MI-BCI experiment. We used machine learning regression algorithm with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to build our model of prediction. We also computed different correlations between those features (neurophysiological predictors) and users’ MI-BCI performances. Our results suggest such models could predict user performances significantly better than chance (p ≤ 0.01) but with a relatively high mean absolute error of 12.43%. We also found significant correlations between a few of our features and the performance, including the previously explored µ-band predictor, as well as a new one proposed here: the µ-peak location variability. These results are thus encouraging to better understand and predict BCI illiteracy. However, they also require further improvements in order to obtain more reliable predictions.

[1]  Bernadette C. M. van Wijk,et al.  Cortical beta oscillations are associated with motor performance following visuomotor learning , 2019, NeuroImage.

[2]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Could Anyone Use a BCI? , 2010, Brain-Computer Interfaces.

[3]  Fabien Lotte,et al.  Would Motor-Imagery based BCI user training benefit from more women experimenters? , 2019, GBCIC.

[4]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  F Lotte,et al.  Advances in user-training for mental-imagery-based BCI control: Psychological and cognitive factors and their neural correlates. , 2016, Progress in brain research.

[9]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[10]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  High Theta and Low Alpha Powers May Be Indicative of BCI-Illiteracy in Motor Imagery , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Margaret C. Thompson,et al.  Critiquing the Concept of BCI Illiteracy , 2018, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[12]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfacing for Intelligent Systems , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[14]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[15]  Fabien Lotte,et al.  Why standard brain-computer interface (BCI) training protocols should be changed: an experimental study , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Melody Moore Jackson,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Their Effect on Predicting Mu Rhythm Modulation , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[18]  Fabien Lotte,et al.  Are users' traits informative enough to predict/explain their mental-imagery based BCI performances? , 2019, GBCIC.

[19]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  G. G. Molina Towards a Practical Brain-Computer Interface , 2007 .

[22]  Adriane B. Randolph Not All Created Equal: Individual-Technology Fit of Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and action observation: Modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.