Solving Graph Problems Using Gaussian Boson Sampling.

Gaussian boson sampling (GBS) is not only a feasible protocol for demonstrating quantum computational advantage, but also mathematically associated with certain graph-related and quantum chemistry problems. In particular, it is proposed that the generated samples from the GBS could be harnessed to enhance the classical stochastic algorithms in searching some graph features. Here, we use Jiǔzhāng, a noisy intermediate-scale quantum computer, to solve graph problems. The samples are generated from a 144-mode fully connected photonic processor, with photon click up to 80 in the quantum computational advantage regime. We investigate the open question of whether the GBS enhancement over the classical stochastic algorithms persists-and how it scales-with an increasing system size on noisy quantum devices in the computationally interesting regime. We experimentally observe the presence of GBS enhancement with a large photon-click number and a robustness of the enhancement under certain noise. Our work is a step toward testing real-world problems using the existing noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers and hopes to stimulate the development of more efficient classical and quantum-inspired algorithms.

[1]  Trevor Vincent,et al.  Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor , 2022, Nature.

[2]  R. B. Patel,et al.  The boundary for quantum advantage in Gaussian boson sampling , 2021, Science advances.

[3]  A. Lita,et al.  Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip , 2021, Nature.

[4]  A. Delgado,et al.  Quantum Algorithm for Simulating Single-Molecule Electron Transport. , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[5]  D. Bacon,et al.  Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor , 2020, Nature Physics.

[6]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Quantum computational advantage using photons , 2020, Science.

[7]  Juan Miguel Arrazola,et al.  Molecular docking with Gaussian Boson Sampling , 2019, Science Advances.

[8]  John C. Platt,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[9]  Yi Hu,et al.  Experimental Gaussian Boson sampling. , 2019, Science bulletin.

[10]  Anthony Laing,et al.  Generation and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip , 2018, Nature Physics.

[11]  John Preskill,et al.  Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.

[12]  G. Guerreschi,et al.  Boson sampling for molecular vibronic spectra , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[13]  Cristopher Moore,et al.  The Nature of Computation , 2011 .

[14]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Computational complexity and information asymmetry in financial products , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[15]  R. Hadfield Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications , 2009 .

[16]  G. Schatz The journal of physical chemistry letters , 2009 .

[17]  M. Hayashi,et al.  Quantum information with Gaussian states , 2007, 0801.4604.

[18]  These authors contributed equally to this work. , 2007 .

[19]  Serafim Batzoglou,et al.  MotifCut: regulatory motifs finding with maximum density subgraphs , 2006, ISMB.

[20]  Uriel Feige,et al.  The Dense k -Subgraph Problem , 2001, Algorithmica.

[21]  大饗 茂 Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan をもっと強化しよう , 1994 .

[22]  H. Hosoya Topological Index. A Newly Proposed Quantity Characterizing the Topological Nature of Structural Isomers of Saturated Hydrocarbons , 1971 .

[23]  M. Fisher On the Dimer Solution of Planar Ising Models , 1966 .