Machine Learning Assisted Stochastic Unit Commitment: A Feasibility Study

Stochastic unit commitment is an effective model for generation scheduling, in the presence of substantial uncertainty. However, effectiveness comes with substantial computational cost. Generally, stochastic unit commitment needs more time than other standard methods such as deterministic, to solve the unit commitment problem. In this paper, the results of initial feasibility studies are presented aiming to find out if using machine learning-based models can facilitate solving stochastic unit commitment problems. A real-world, large-scale test case is used to demonstrate the capabilities and shortcomings of machine learning algorithms in reducing the calculation time without sacrificing accuracy. Our feasibility study reveals that while it is unlikely to train a machine learning model to solve the problem as a standalone platform, it is possible to use a trained machine learning model to assist in accelerating the solution of the stochastic model.

[1]  Mostafa Sahraei-Ardakani,et al.  Multidimensional Scenario Selection for Power Systems With Stochastic Failures , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Mostafa Sahraei-Ardakani,et al.  Tractable Stochastic Unit Commitment for Large Systems During Predictable Hazards , 2020, IEEE Access.

[3]  Gerald Thomas Heydt,et al.  Coordinated Scheduling of Power Generation and Water Desalination Units , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment for AC-DC Grids With Generation and Load Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Scenario Map Based Stochastic Unit Commitment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Grid Structural Characteristics as Validation Criteria for Synthetic Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Michael C. Caramanis,et al.  Security-Constrained Transmission Topology Control MILP Formulation Using Sensitivity Factors , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Marc Timme,et al.  A Dual Method for Computing Power Transfer Distribution Factors , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  M. Kubát An Introduction to Machine Learning , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[10]  Zhu Han,et al.  Stochastic Pre-hurricane Restoration Planning for Electric Power Systems Infrastructure , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  A solution to the unit commitment problem—a review , 2013 .

[12]  B. Singh,et al.  Unit commitment in electrical power system-a literature review , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference Melaka, Malaysia.

[13]  Taiwo Oladipupo Ayodele,et al.  Types of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2010 .

[14]  O. Alsaç,et al.  DC Power Flow Revisited , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  N.D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Decision Trees-Aided Self-Organized Maps for Corrective Dynamic Security , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Fast SCUC for Large-Scale Power Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  K. A. Papadogiannis,et al.  Optimal allocation of primary reserve services in energy markets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Machine Learning Applications to Power Systems , 2001, Machine Learning and Its Applications.

[20]  M. Abdelguerfi,et al.  Introduction 1.2 Parallel Database Systems 1.2.1 Computation Model 2 1.2 Parallel Database Systems Introduction Select * from Employee, Department Where (employee.dept_no @bullet Department.dept_no) and (employee.position = "manager") (a) Sql Request 1.2.2 Engineering Model , 2022 .