Optimizing Pushback Decisions to Valuate Airport Surface Surveillance Information

As airport surface surveillance technologies develop, aircraft ground position information becomes more easily available and accurate. This paper provides a better understanding of the value of future surface surveillance systems where departures, and more specifically pushback times, will be optimized. It analytically quantifies the potential benefits yielded by providing surveillance information to the agent or system that is entrusted with tactically optimizing pushback clearances under nominal conditions. A stochastic model of surface operations is developed for single-ramp surface operations and calibrated to emulate departure surface operations at LaGuardia Airport. Two levels of information are examined within a tactically optimized collaborative decision-making framework. For each level, emissions, number of taxiing aircraft, and runway utilization rate are analyzed and compared with a simple threshold policy to evaluate surface surveillance information. Safety benefits, however, are not considered in this paper. It is estimated that optimally controlling pushback clearances from a single-ramp area using detailed surface surveillance information does not provide significant benefits when compared with controlling pushback clearances using a gate-holding policy based on the number of aircraft currently taxiing. However, when the runway is functioning at intermediate capacity (50%-72% runway utilization rates), e.g., under adverse weather conditions, surveillance information may improve optimization of departure operations. In such case, emissions and the number of taxiing aircraft are reduced by up to 6% when compared with the gate-holding policy and by up to 3% when compared with the performance of an intelligent operator with limited information.

[1]  Loan Thanh Le,et al.  Demand management at congested airports : how far are we from Utopia? , 2006 .

[2]  F. S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction to Operations Research, 10th ed. , 1986 .

[3]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Queuing Model for Taxi-Out Time Estimation , 2002 .

[4]  J. Penner,et al.  Aviation and the Global Atmosphere , 1999 .

[5]  Nicolas Pujet,et al.  Input-output modeling and control of the departure process of congested airports , 1999 .

[6]  M. Littman The Witness Algorithm: Solving Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes , 1994 .

[7]  Paul Fontaine,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Surface Surveillance Data Sharing on Day-to-day Surface Operations , 2004 .

[8]  Eric Feron,et al.  The Departure Planner: A Conceptual Discussion , 1997 .

[9]  Hamsa Balakrishnan,et al.  Queuing Models of Airport Departure Processes for Emissions Reduction , 2009 .

[10]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Assigning Gates by Resolving Physical Conflicts , 2009 .

[11]  Hamsa Balakrishnan,et al.  A Framework for Coordinated Surface Operations Planning at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport , 2007 .

[12]  Dietmar Böhme,et al.  Runway operations planning and control sequencing and scheduling , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Vince Papsidero Airport Noise Regulations , 1992 .

[14]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  Managing departure aircraft release for efficient airport surface operations , 2010 .

[15]  AVIATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT Strategic Framework Needed to Address Challenges Posed by Aircraft Emissions , 2003 .

[16]  R. Faure,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1968 .

[17]  Paul Roling,et al.  Optimal Airport Surface Traffic Planning Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming , 2003 .

[18]  Linking Traffic Management to the Airport Surface Departure Flow Management and Beyond , 2009 .

[19]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Modeling and control of airport queueing dynamics under severe flow restrictions , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[20]  Edmund K. Burke,et al.  The Effect of the Planning Horizon and the Freezing Time on Take-off Sequencing , 2006 .

[21]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Collaborative Virtual Queue: Benefit Analysis of a Collaborative Decision Making Concept Applied to Congested Airport Departure Operations , 2009 .

[22]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  A Concept and Implementation of Optimized Operations of Airport Surface Traffic , 2010 .

[23]  Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.  Acting under uncertainty: discrete Bayesian models for mobile-robot navigation , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96.

[24]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .