64Cu-Labeled Gp2 Domain for PET Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

This purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a 45-amino acid Gp2 domain, engineered to bind to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as a positron emission tomography (PET) probe of EGFR in a xenograft mouse model. The EGFR-targeted Gp2 (Gp2-EGFR) and a nonbinding control were site-specifically labeled with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelator. Binding affinity was tested toward human EGFR and mouse EGFR. Biological activity on downstream EGFR signaling was examined in cell culture. DOTA-Gp2 molecules were labeled with 64Cu and intravenously injected (0.6-2.3 MBq) into mice bearing EGFRhigh (n = 7) and EGFRlow (n = 4) xenografted tumors. PET/computed tomography (CT) images were acquired at 45 min, 2 h, and 24 h. Dynamic PET (25 min) was also acquired. Tomography results were verified with gamma counting of resected tissues. Two-tailed t tests with unequal variances provided statistical comparison. DOTA-Gp2-EGFR bound strongly to human (KD = 7 ± 5 nM) and murine (KD = 29 ± 6 nM) EGFR, and nontargeted Gp2 had no detectable binding. Gp2-EGFR did not agonize EGFR nor antagonize EGF-EGFR. 64Cu-Gp2-EGFR tracer effectively localized to EGFRhigh tumors at 45 min (3.2 ± 0.5%ID/g). High specificity was observed with significantly lower uptake in EGFRlow tumors (0.9 ± 0.3%ID/g, p < 0.001), high tumor-to-background ratios (11 ± 6 tumor/muscle, p < 0.001). Nontargeted Gp2 tracer had low uptake in EGFRhigh tumors (0.5 ± 0.3%ID/g, p < 0.001). Similar data was observed at 2 h, and tumor signal was retained at 24 h (2.9 ± 0.3%ID/g). An engineered Gp2 PET imaging probe exhibited low background and target-specific EGFRhigh tumor uptake at 45 min, with tumor signal retained at 24 h postinjection, and compared favorably with published EGFR PET probes for alternative protein scaffolds. These beneficial in vivo characteristics, combined with thermal stability, efficient evolution, and small size of the Gp2 domain validate its use as a future class of molecular imaging agents.

[1]  Wengui Xu,et al.  Predictive efficacy of 11C‐PD153035 PET imaging for EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity in non‐small cell lung cancer patients , 2016, International journal of cancer.

[2]  R. Boellaard,et al.  89Zr-cetuximab PET imaging in patients with advanced colorectal cancer , 2015, Oncotarget.

[3]  V. T. Duong,et al.  A 45-Amino-Acid Scaffold Mined from the PDB for High-Affinity Ligand Engineering. , 2015, Chemistry & biology.

[4]  H. Hong,et al.  Matching the Decay Half-Life with the Biological Half-Life: ImmunoPET Imaging with 44Sc-Labeled Cetuximab Fab Fragment , 2014, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[5]  H. Kim,et al.  Prognostic and predictive values of EGFR overexpression and EGFR copy number alteration in HER2-positive breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  G. V. van Dongen,et al.  Development of [18F]afatinib as new TKI-PET tracer for EGFR positive tumors. , 2014, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[7]  Zhen Cheng,et al.  Comparison of Two Site-Specifically 18F-Labeled Affibodies for PET Imaging of EGFR Positive Tumors , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[8]  D. Mankoff,et al.  A Phase 2 Study of 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol Positron Emission Tomography (FES-PET) as a Marker of Hormone Sensitivity in Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[9]  Benjamin J. Hackel,et al.  Alternative Protein Scaffolds for Molecular Imaging and Therapy , 2014 .

[10]  C. Chai,et al.  The prognostic values of EGFR expression and KRAS mutation in patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic colorectal cancer , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[11]  B. Hackel,et al.  Alternative Non-Antibody Protein Scaffolds for Molecular Imaging of Cancer. , 2013, Current opinion in chemical engineering.

[12]  W. Kozlowski,et al.  Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer on the basis of the Allred scoring system , 2013, OncoTargets and therapy.

[13]  J. Doroshow,et al.  Zirconium-89 labeled panitumumab: a potential immuno-PET probe for HER1-expressing carcinomas. , 2013, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[14]  Mark Lubberink,et al.  Development of [11C]erlotinib Positron Emission Tomography for In Vivo Evaluation of EGF Receptor Mutational Status , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Designed hydrophilic and charge mutations of the fibronectin domain: towards tailored protein biodistribution. , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[16]  Zhen Cheng,et al.  PET of EGFR Expression with an 18F-Labeled Affibody Molecule , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Hedvig Hricak,et al.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care , 2012, Molecular oncology.

[18]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Use of (64)Cu-labeled fibronectin domain with EGFR-overexpressing tumor xenograft: molecular imaging. , 2012, Radiology.

[19]  J. Cochran,et al.  Knottins: disulfide-bonded therapeutic and diagnostic peptides. , 2012, Drug discovery today. Technologies.

[20]  J. Willmann,et al.  Pharmacokinetically Stabilized Cystine Knot Peptides That Bind Alpha-v-Beta-6 Integrin with Single-Digit Nanomolar Affinities for Detection of Pancreatic Cancer , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  C. Vanhove,et al.  Correlation Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Specific Nanobody Uptake and Tumor Burden: A Tool for Noninvasive Monitoring of Tumor Response to Therapy , 2011, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[22]  F. Bénard,et al.  Evaluation of 64Cu-labeled bifunctional chelate-bombesin conjugates. , 2011, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[23]  D. Jonker,et al.  EGFR expression variance in paired colorectal cancer primary and metastatic tumors , 2010, Cancer biology & therapy.

[24]  L. Terracciano,et al.  Prognostic impact of the expression of putative cancer stem cell markers CD133, CD166, CD44s, EpCAM, and ALDH1 in colorectal cancer , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  L. Abrahmsén,et al.  Targeting of HER2-Expressing Tumors Using 111In-ABY-025, a Second-Generation Affibody Molecule with a Fundamentally Reengineered Scaffold , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Fredrik Y Frejd,et al.  Affibody molecules: Engineered proteins for therapeutic, diagnostic and biotechnological applications , 2010, FEBS letters.

[27]  H. Komatsu [Antibody therapy in cancer]. , 2010, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[28]  Jinha M. Park,et al.  64Cu-Labeled Affibody Molecules for Imaging of HER2 Expressing Tumors , 2010, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[29]  Zhen Cheng,et al.  Small-animal PET imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor positive tumor with a 64Cu labeled affibody protein. , 2010, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[30]  Kazunori Kawamura,et al.  [11C]Gefitinib ([11C]Iressa): Radiosynthesis, In Vitro Uptake, and In Vivo Imaging of Intact Murine Fibrosarcoma , 2010, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[31]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Cetuximab-Based Immunotherapy and Radioimmunotherapy of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[32]  Vladimir Tolmachev,et al.  Imaging of EGFR expression in murine xenografts using site-specifically labelled anti-EGFR 111In-DOTA-ZEGFR:2377 Affibody molecule: aspect of the injected tracer amount , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  Andreas Plückthun,et al.  Efficient tumor targeting with high-affinity designed ankyrin repeat proteins: effects of affinity and molecular size. , 2010, Cancer research.

[34]  Matti Anniko,et al.  Blocking EGFR in the liver improves the tumor-to-liver uptake ratio of radiolabeled EGF , 2010, Tumor Biology.

[35]  J. Reid,et al.  Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Michael M. Schmidt,et al.  A modeling analysis of the effects of molecular size and binding affinity on tumor targeting , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[37]  R. Labianca,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) correlates with clinical activity of irinotecan-cetuximab in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a fluorescence in situ (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[38]  A. Chambers,et al.  MDA-MB-435 and M14 cell lines: identical but not M14 melanoma? , 2009, Cancer research.

[39]  D. Kiesewetter,et al.  Changes in HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer Xenografts After Therapy Can Be Quantified Using PET and 18F-Labeled Affibody Molecules , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  Q. Le,et al.  PET of EGFR Antibody Distribution in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  G. Winter,et al.  Phage-encoded combinatorial chemical libraries based on bicyclic peptides. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[42]  Joachim Feldwisch,et al.  Targeting of HER2-Expressing Tumors with a Site-Specifically 99mTc-Labeled Recombinant Affibody Molecule, ZHER2:2395, with C-Terminally Engineered Cysteine , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  N. Hynes,et al.  ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  S. Stone-Elander,et al.  On the Selection of a Tracer for PET Imaging of HER2-Expressing Tumors: Direct Comparison of a 124I-Labeled Affibody Molecule and Trastuzumab in a Murine Xenograft Model , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  Steen Jakobsen,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with [11C]-labeled erlotinib: a micro-PET study on mice with lung tumor xenografts. , 2009, Cancer research.

[46]  S. Ståhl,et al.  Affibody Molecules for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting In Vivo: Aspects of Dimerization and Labeling Chemistry , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  D. A. Capretto,et al.  Receptor-binding, biodistribution, and metabolism studies of 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab, a PET-imaging agent for epidermal growth-factor receptor-positive tumors. , 2008, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[48]  K Dane Wittrup,et al.  Quantitative spatiotemporal analysis of antibody fragment diffusion and endocytic consumption in tumor spheroids. , 2008, Cancer research.

[49]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Small-Animal PET Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Expression with Site-Specific 18F-Labeled Protein Scaffold Molecules , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  Christian Vanhove,et al.  Comparison of the Biodistribution and Tumor Targeting of Two 99mTc-Labeled Anti-EGFR Nanobodies in Mice, Using Pinhole SPECT/Micro-CT , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[51]  J. Carlsson,et al.  In vivo and in vitro uptake of 111In, delivered with the affibody molecule (ZEGFR:955)2, in EGFR expressing tumour cells. , 2008, Oncology reports.

[52]  C. Vanhove,et al.  SPECT Imaging with 99mTc-Labeled EGFR-Specific Nanobody for In Vivo Monitoring of EGFR Expression , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[53]  A. Ardizzoni,et al.  Comparison Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Gene Expression in Primary Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and in Fine-Needle Aspirates from Distant Metastatic Sites , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[54]  L. Martiniova,et al.  [18F]FBEM-ZHER2:342-Affibody molecule—a new molecular tracer for in vivo monitoring of HER2 expression by positron emission tomography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[55]  A. Haese*,et al.  Clinical Significance of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Protein Overexpression and Gene Copy Number Gains in Prostate Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[56]  A. Karlström,et al.  (99m)Tc-maEEE-Z(HER2:342), an Affibody molecule-based tracer for the detection of HER2 expression in malignant tumors. , 2007, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[57]  E. Shpall,et al.  Prognostic significance of overexpression and phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the presence of truncated EGFRvIII in locoregionally advanced breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  Jinming Yu,et al.  Assessment of 11C‐labeled‐4‐N‐(3‐bromoanilino)‐6, 7‐dimethoxyquinazoline as a positron emission tomography agent to monitor epidermal growth factor receptor expression , 2007, Cancer science.

[59]  M. Orditura,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression is Associated With a Worse Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[60]  A. Koong,et al.  Quantitative PET of EGFR expression in xenograft-bearing mice using 64Cu-labeled cetuximab, a chimeric anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[61]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[62]  Vladimir Tolmachev,et al.  111In-benzyl-DTPA-ZHER2:342, an affibody-based conjugate for in vivo imaging of HER2 expression in malignant tumors. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[64]  R. Berardi,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in primary colorectal tumors does not correlate with EGFR expression in related metastatic sites: implications for treatment with EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[65]  A. Santoro,et al.  Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor expression as a predictive factor for response to gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839) in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[66]  Weijun Niu,et al.  Comparative in vivo stability of copper-64-labeled cross-bridged and conventional tetraazamacrocyclic complexes. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[67]  Kenji Tada,et al.  Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. , 2003, Cancer research.

[68]  G. Ginsburg,et al.  The path to personalized medicine. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[69]  A. Koide,et al.  The fibronectin type III domain as a scaffold for novel binding proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  R K Jain,et al.  Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. , 1995, Cancer research.

[71]  Manuel Simon,et al.  Designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) from research to therapy. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[72]  J. Feldwisch,et al.  Evaluation of maleimide derivative of DOTA for site-specific labeling of recombinant affibody molecules. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.