Detection of gait perturbations based on proprioceptive information. Application to Limit Cycle Walkers

Walking on irregular surfaces and in the presence of unexpected events is a challenging problem for bipedal machines. Up to date, their ability to cope with gait disturbances is far less successful than humans': Neither trajectory controlled robots, nor dynamic walking machines Limit Cycle Walkers are able to handle them satisfactorily. On the contrary, humans reject gait perturbations naturally and efficiently relying on their sensory organs that, if needed, elicit a recovery action. A similar approach may be envisioned for bipedal robots and exoskeletons: An algorithm continuously observes the state of the walker and, if an unexpected event happens, triggers an adequate reaction. This paper presents a monitoring algorithm that provides immediate detection of any type of perturbation based solely on a phase representation of the normal walking of the robot. The proposed method was evaluated in a Limit Cycle Walker prototype that suffered push and trip perturbations at different moments of the gait cycle, providing 100% successful detections for the current experimental apparatus and adequately tuned parameters, with no false positives when the robot is walking unperturbed.

[1]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Sven Behnke,et al.  Instability Detection and Fall Avoidance for a Humanoid using Attitude Sensors and Reflexes , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Hybrid zero dynamics of planar biped walkers , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  James A Ashton-Miller,et al.  On use of a nominal internal model to detect a loss of balance in a maximal forward reach. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Taishin Nomura,et al.  Stumbling with optimal phase reset during gait can prevent a humanoid from falling , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  J. Duysens,et al.  Neural control of locomotion; Part 1: The central pattern generator from cats to humans , 1998 .

[8]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action , 1999, Neuroreport.

[9]  Prahlad Vadakkepat,et al.  Disturbance rejection by online ZMP compensation , 2008, Robotica.

[10]  T. Ishida Development of a small biped entertainment robot QRIO , 2004, Micro-Nanomechatronics and Human Science, 2004 and The Fourth Symposium Micro-Nanomechatronics for Information-Based Society, 2004..

[11]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Multiple-step strategies to recover from stumbling perturbations. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[12]  T. Benedict,et al.  Synthesis of an optimal set of radar track-while-scan smoothing equations , 1962 .

[13]  J. Duysens,et al.  Muscle reflexes and synergies triggered by an unexpected support surface height during walking. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[15]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[16]  D. Winter,et al.  Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Control Approach for Actuated Dynamic Walking in Biped Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  R. Llinás I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self , 2000 .

[19]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Describing gait as a sequence of states. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  Fall detection in walking robots by multi-way principal component analysis , 2009, Robotica.

[21]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Falling motion control for humanoid robots while walking , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[22]  Kikuo Fujimura,et al.  The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[23]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  Ankle Actuation for Limit Cycle Walkers , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons , 2008 .

[25]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  A Disturbance Rejection Measure for Limit Cycle Walkers: The Gait Sensitivity Norm , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[26]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[28]  Michael Menzinger,et al.  On the local stability of limit cycles. , 1999, Chaos.

[29]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  Dynamics of Bipedal Gait: Part II—Stability Analysis of a Planar Five-Link Biped , 1993 .

[30]  J. Duysens,et al.  Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Oliver Höhn,et al.  Probabilistic Balance Monitoring for Bipedal Robots , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..