Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research

Abstract Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) has become a key multivariate analysis technique that human resource management (HRM) researchers frequently use. While most disciplines undertake regular critical reflections on the use of important methods to ensure rigorous research and publication practices, the use of PLS-SEM in HRM has not been analyzed so far. To address this gap in HRM literature, this paper presents a critical review of PLS-SEM use in 77 HRM studies published over a 30-year period in leading journals. By contrasting the review results with state-of-the-art guidelines for use of the method, we identify several areas that offer room of improvement when applying PLS-SEM in HRM studies. Our findings offer important guidance for future use of the PLS-SEM method in HRM and related fields.

[1]  K. Jöreskog.  Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices , 1978 .

[2]  N Cliff,et al.  Some Cautions Concerning The Application Of Causal Modeling Methods. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[4]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[5]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. , 1991 .

[6]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[7]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[8]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[9]  P. Hackl,et al.  Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures , 1999 .

[10]  J. Edwards.  Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[11]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[12]  Frank Huber,et al.  Capturing Customer Heterogeneity using a Finite Mixture PLS Approach , 2002 .

[13]  A. Kaplan,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis , 2004 .

[14]  Valerie Anderson,et al.  Research Methods in Human Resource Management , 2004 .

[15]  Fernando Martín‐Alcázar,et al.  Strategic human resource management: integrating the universalistic, contingent, configurational and contextual perspectives , 2005 .

[16]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[17]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[19]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models. An Illustration of Available Procedures , 2005 .

[20]  C. Saunders,et al.  Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet? , 2006 .

[21]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[22]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[23]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[24]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[25]  Fernando Martín‐Alcázar,et al.  Human Resource Management as a Field of Research , 2008 .

[26]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in PLS Path Modeling , 2008 .

[27]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Service staff attitudes, organisational practices and performance drivers , 2008 .

[28]  S. Fleetwood,et al.  Theorising under-theorisation in research on the HRM - performance link , 2008 .

[29]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  The impact of implicit and explicit communications on frontline service delivery staff , 2008 .

[30]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[31]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? , 2009 .

[32]  Aidan Kelly,et al.  The Association of Business Schools: Academic journal quality guide, version 3 , 2009 .

[33]  Brian R. Dineen,et al.  Employee-Organization Exchange Relationships, HRM Practices, and Quit Rates of Good and Poor Performers , 2009 .

[34]  M. Subramony.  A meta‐analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance , 2009 .

[35]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[36]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[37]  K. Thommes,et al.  Explanatory Factors for Firms' Use of Temporary Agency Work in Germany , 2010 .

[38]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2010 .

[39]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Handbook of Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[40]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  An Introduction to a Permutation Based Procedure for Multi-Group PLS Analysis: Results of Tests of Differences on Simulated Data and a Cross Cultural Analysis of the Sourcing of Information System Services Between Germany and the USA , 2010 .

[41]  Sönke Albers,et al.  PLS and Success Factor Studies in Marketing , 2010 .

[42]  Stephen T.T. Teo,et al.  Human capital enhancing HRM systems and frontline employees in Australian manufacturing SMEs , 2011 .

[43]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[44]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[45]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics , 2011 .

[46]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Multigroup Analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results , 2011 .

[47]  G. Mateos-Aparicio.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) Methods: Origins, Evolution, and Application to Social Sciences , 2011 .

[48]  A. Peluso,et al.  Trust as moderator in the relationship between HRM practices and employee attitudes , 2011 .

[49]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[50]  Fujun Lai,et al.  Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research , 2012 .

[51]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  When Imprecise Statistical Statements Become Problematic: A Response to Goodhue, Lewis, and Thompson , 2012, MIS Q..

[52]  William Lewis,et al.  Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? , 2012, MIS Q..

[53]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: In Praise of Simple Methods , 2012 .

[54]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications , 2012 .

[55]  M. Hitt,et al.  Contingency Hypotheses in Strategic Management Research , 2012 .

[56]  Janet H. Marler.  Strategic Human Resource Management in Context: A Historical and Global Perspective , 2012 .

[57]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[58]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective , 2012 .

[59]  S. Teo,et al.  Emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, well-being and engagement: explaining organisational commitment and turnover intentions in policing , 2012 .

[60]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[61]  Rafael Triguero-Sánchez,et al.  Hierarchical distance as a moderator of HRM practices on organizational performance , 2013 .

[62]  M. Russo,et al.  Reducing the effects of work-family conflict on job satisfaction: the kind of commitment matters , 2013 .

[63]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS path modeling and evolutionary segmentation , 2013 .

[64]  Udo Konradt,et al.  Fairness Perceptions in Web‐Based Selection: Impact on Applicants’ Pursuit Intentions, Recommendation Intentions, and Intentions to Reapply , 2013 .

[65]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[66]  Arun Rai,et al.  Discovering Unobserved Heterogeneity in Structural Equation Models to Avert Validity Threats , 2013, MIS Q..

[67]  Torsten Oliver Salge,et al.  Untangling the relationship between HRM and hospital performance: the mediating role of attitudinal and behavioural HR outcomes† , 2013 .

[68]  Mikko Rönkkö,et al.  A Critical Examination of Common Beliefs About Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2013 .

[69]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling , 2013, Comput. Stat..

[70]  Arun Rai,et al.  Predictive Validity and Formative Measurement in Structural Equation Modeling: Embracing Practical Relevance , 2013, ICIS.

[71]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  You Write, but Others Read: Common Methodological Misunderstandings in PLS and Related Methods , 2013 .

[72]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods , 2013 .

[73]  P. Almond,et al.  Cross-national comparative human resource management and the ideational sphere: a critical review , 2014 .

[74]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Rethinking Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Breaking Chains and Forging Ahead , 2014 .

[75]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers , 2014 .

[76]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory: When to Choose It and How to Use It , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[77]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[78]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM: A Commentary on Rigdon (2012) , 2014 .

[79]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[80]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Genetic algorithm segmentation in partial least squares structural equation modeling , 2013, OR Spectrum.

[81]  B. Steijn,et al.  HRM and its effect on employee, organizational and financial outcomes in health care organizations , 2014, Human Resources for Health.

[82]  Alejandro Bello-Pintado,et al.  Bundles of HRM practices and performance: empirical evidence from a Latin American context , 2015 .

[83]  Mikko Rönkkö,et al.  On the adoption of partial least squares in psychological research: Caveat emptor , 2015 .

[84]  Lutz Kaufmann,et al.  A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research , 2015 .

[85]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations , 2014 .

[86]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[87]  Sven Kepes,et al.  The influence of internal HRM activity fit on the dynamics within the "black box"☆ , 2015 .

[88]  José L. Roldán,et al.  European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) , 2015 .

[89]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares , 2016 .

[90]  J. Chowhan.  Unpacking the black box: understanding the relationship between strategy, HRM practices, innovation and organizational performance , 2016 .

[91]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective , 2016 .

[92]  Christian M. Ringle,et al.  The PLS agent: Predictive modeling with PLS-SEM and agent-based simulation , 2016 .

[93]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! ☆ , 2016 .

[94]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[95]  J. Edwards,et al.  Partial least squares path modeling: Time for some serious second thoughts , 2016 .

[96]  S. Gudergan,et al.  Capturing heterogeneity and PLS-SEM prediction ability: Alliance governance and innovation , 2016 .

[97]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models , 2016 .

[98]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development , 2016 .

[99]  Jie Shen,et al.  Principles and Applications of Multilevel Modeling in Human Resource Management Research , 2016 .

[100]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach , 2016 .

[101]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[102]  Sandra Streukens,et al.  Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results , 2016 .

[103]  José L. Roldán,et al.  Prediction-oriented modeling in business research by means of PLS path modeling: Introduction to a JBR special section , 2016 .

[104]  J. Henseler.  Partial least squares path modeling , 2017 .

[105]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations , 2017 .

[106]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research , 2017 .

[107]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2017 .

[108]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Estimating hierarchical constructs using consistent partial least squares: The case of second-order composites of common factors , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[109]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods , 2017, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[110]  C. Jabbour,et al.  Ethical awareness, ethical judgment, andwhistleblowing: A moderated mediation analysis , 2017 .

[111]  S. Çakir,et al.  MODELING NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS OF EU COUNTRIES USING PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING (PLS-SEM) , 2017 .

[112]  J. Henseler.  Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling , 2017 .

[113]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. , 2017, Psychological methods.

[114]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2021, Handbook of Market Research.

[115]  Faizan Ali,et al.  An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Hospitality Research , 2017 .

[116]  Lucy Matthews,et al.  Applying Multigroup Analysis in PLS-SEM: A Step-by-Step Process , 2017 .

[117]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies ☆ , 2017 .

[118]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[119]  Patrick J. Rosopa,et al.  Robustness of statistical inferences using linear models with meta-analytic correlation matrices , 2017 .

[120]  Miguel I. Aguirre-Urreta,et al.  Statistical Inference with PLSc Using Bootstrap Confidence Intervals , 2018, MIS Q..

[121]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The use of sampling methods in advertising research: a gap between theory and practice , 2018 .

[122]  Ned Kock,et al.  Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[123]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .