Cities and Workplace Communication: Some Quantitative French Evidence

This paper uses a unique labour force survey to document workplace communication patterns in urban, suburban and rural areas. A number of interesting stylised facts are distilled relating to workplace communication: its intensity, within-firm communication, communication external to the firm and the media being used with a special focus on information technologies. The paper also investigates the complementarities across different media of communication and the evolution over time of workplace communication patterns. It is found that cities foster communication external to the firm and the use of telecommunications. By contrast, the hypothesis of a greater prevalence of face-to-face communication in cities does not receive much empirical validation. Also, complementarities across media do not lend much support to popular predictions about the forthcoming demise of cities following the replacement of face-to-face meetings by telecommunications.

[1]  Mitsuru Ota,et al.  COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION OF MULTI-UNIT FIRMS IN METROPOLITAN AREAS. IN: TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1991 .

[2]  Riccardo Crescenzi,et al.  Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe , 2006 .

[3]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[4]  Frances Cairncross.  The death of distance : how the communications revolution will change our lives , 1997 .

[5]  D. Guellec,et al.  Firm Organization, Technology And Performance: An Empirical Study , 1998 .

[6]  T. Holmes.  Localization of Industry and Vertical Disintegration , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  G. Duranton,et al.  Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where and When Does it Matter? , 1999 .

[8]  C. Jensen-butler,et al.  Demand for information and communication technology‐based services and regional economic development* , 2003 .

[9]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[10]  A. Marshall.  Principles of Economics , .

[11]  Thomas J. Holmes,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities in North America , 2003 .

[12]  Max Nathan,et al.  The Wrong Stuff? Creative Class Theory and Economic Performance in UK cities/Ce Qui Ne Marche Pas? la Theorie De la Classe Creative et la Performance Economique Dans Les Villes Au R.-U , 2007 .

[13]  G. Duranton,et al.  From Sectoral to Functional Urban Specialisation , 2001 .

[14]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership , 2005 .

[15]  G. Duranton,et al.  Communication Externalities in Cities , 2003 .

[16]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[17]  Nobuaki Hamaguchi,et al.  Communication Externalities on the Knowledge-based Firms in Metropolitan Areas: Case Study of China and Korea , 2006 .

[18]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  The Economic Geography of the Internet Age , 2001 .

[19]  D. Galliano,et al.  The evolution of the spatial digital divide : from internet adoption to internet use by french industrial firms , 2005 .

[20]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies , 2004 .

[21]  J. B. Goddard,et al.  Office linkages and location;: A study of communications and spatial patterns in central London, , 1973 .

[22]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[23]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[24]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Information Technology and the Future of Cities , 1996 .