Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies

Abstract Unlike many languages of Southeast Asia, Khmer (Cambodian) is not a tone language. However, in the colloquial speech of the capital Phnom Penh, /r/ is lost in onsets, reportedly supplanted by a range of other acoustic cues such as aspiration, a falling- or low-rising f0 contour, breathy voice quality, and in some cases diphthongization, e.g. /krɑː/ ‘poor’>[kɑ], [khɔˇɑ], [k ɔ ¨ ɑ ¨ ], /kruː/  ‘teacher’>[k u ` ː], [khuˇː], [k u ¨ ː ]. This paper presents the results of production and perception studies designed to shed light on this unusual sound change. Acoustic evidence shows that colloquial /CrV/ forms differ from reading pronunciation forms in terms of VOT, f0, and spectral balance measures, while a pair of perceptual studies demonstrate that f0 is a sufficient cue for listeners to distinguish underlying /CrV/-initial from /CV/-initial forms, but that F1 is not. I suggest that this sound change may have arisen via the perceptual reanalysis of changes in spectral balance, coupled with the coarticulatory influence of the dorsal gesture for /r/.

[1]  Sun-Young Oh,et al.  Toward universals in the gestural organization of syllables: A cross-linguistic study of liquids , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  An improved correction formula for the estimation of harmonic magnitudes and its application to open quotient estimation , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[3]  Robert K. Headley,et al.  Modern Cambodian-English Dictionary , 1997 .

[4]  Eugénie J. A. Henderson,et al.  The Main Features of Cambodian Pronunciation , 1952, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies.

[5]  David Weenink The klattgrid speech synthesizer , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[6]  Franklin E. Huffman The boundary between the monosyllable and the disyllable in Cambodian , 1972 .

[7]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[8]  Maria-Josep Solé,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[9]  Allard Jongman,et al.  The Raising Effect of Aspirated Prevocalic Consonants on F 0 in Taiwanese , 2009 .

[10]  C A Fowler,et al.  Intrinsicf0 differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Laver The phonetic description of voice quality , 1980 .

[13]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Effects of initial position versus prominence in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[14]  W. Bright International Encyclopedia of Linguistics , 1993 .

[15]  Michel Ferlus,et al.  Essai de phonétique historique du khmer (du milieu du premier millénaire de notre ère à l'époque actuelle) , 1992 .

[16]  G. Thurgood Vietnamese and tonogenesis: Revising the model and the analysis , 2002 .

[17]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  R. Pittman,et al.  Mon-Khmer studies , 1967 .

[19]  David House,et al.  Tone production, tone perception and Kammu tonogenesis , 2006, Phonology.

[20]  Philip N. Jenner Cambodian System of Writing and Beginning Reader, with Drills and Glossary . By Franklin E. Huffman. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970. xii, 365 pp. Glossary (Cambodian-English), Bibliography. $12.00. , 1971 .

[21]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[22]  P. Boersma ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[23]  James P. Kirby The role of probabilistic enhancement in phonologization , 2012 .

[24]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[25]  Jean-Marie Hombert,et al.  Development of tones from vowel height , 1977 .

[26]  Keren Rice,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Phonology , 2011 .

[27]  Franklin Eugene Huffman An outline of Cambodian grammar , 1967 .

[28]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[29]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Quantity constraints on the temporal implementation of phrasal prosody in Northern Finnish , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[30]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy and clear vowels: the case of Khmer , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[31]  Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow,et al.  Sprachgeschichtliche Erwägungen zum Phonemsystem des Khmer , 1957 .

[32]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  PHONETIC AND AUDITORY TRADING RELATIONS BETWEEN ACOUSTIC CUES IN SPEECH PERCEPTION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1981 .

[33]  Eunjong Kong,et al.  Why are Korean tense stops acquired so early?: The role of acoustic properties , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[34]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Voice Register in Khmu’: Experiments in Production and Perception , 2007, Phonetica.

[35]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[36]  D. Whalen,et al.  Cricothyroid activity in high and low vowels: exploring the automaticity of intrinsic F0 , 1999 .

[37]  Mark Hasegawa-Johnson,et al.  Prosodic effects on acoustic cues to stop voicing and place of articulation: Evidence from Radio News speech , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[38]  D. Whalen,et al.  The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels , 1995 .

[39]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  Tongue-tip trills and vocal-tract wall compliance. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Ratree Wayland,et al.  Aerodynamic Coarticulation in Sound Change or How Onset Trills Can Condition a Falling Tone , 2004 .

[41]  Franklin E. Huffman THE REGISTER PROBLEM IN FIFTEEN MON-KHMER LANGUAGES , 2016 .

[42]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[43]  A. Lotto,et al.  Effect of Voice Quality on Perceived Height of English Vowels , 1997, Phonetica.

[44]  Douglas H. Whalen,et al.  MRI evidence for commonality in the post-oral articulations of English vowels and liquids , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[45]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.