A research agenda for information quality assurance in public safety networks: information orchestration as the middle ground between hierarchical and netcentric approaches

One of the key challenges in public safety networks is to ensure a high level of information quality (IQ) during disaster response. Since many evaluation reports on disaster response efforts have revealed instances of poor IQ, both academics and practitioners are in search of information architectures that assure IQ. This article focuses on the hurdles and opportunities for IQ assurance via information architectures. Drawing on two opposing coordination approaches, hierarchical versus netcentric, we suggest adopting a hybrid, information orchestration-based approach for assuring IQ. While hierarchical coordination approaches result in architectures dictating predefined information flows dependent on structures and procedures, netcentric information coordination emphasizes the need for individual self-synchronization driven by events. Even though both architectures have their strengths and weaknesses depending on several contingencies, both include characteristics that hamper IQ assurance for relief workers. Information orchestration offers the middle ground between hierarchical and netcentric approaches and defined as a heterarchical form of information coordination consisting of a specific set of roles and capabilities related to the collection, enrichment, and dissemination of high-quality information. Capabilities that need to be developed according to the information orchestration approach constitute a research agenda.

[1]  Usmcr Lt. Col. Mark Stanovich Network-centric emergency response: The challenges of training for a new command and control paradigm , 2006 .

[2]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Bruce B. Cahan,et al.  Learning From Crisis , 2004 .

[4]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Stages of Growth in e-Government : An Architectural Approach , 2006 .

[5]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[6]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Holmes Miller,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[8]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[9]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Anticipatory systems : philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations , 1985 .

[10]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  T. Redman Improve Data Quality for Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[12]  P. Mouncey Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality , 2001 .

[13]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies (Reprint) , 1988 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[15]  J. Peter Kincaid,et al.  A framework for web-based dissemination of models and lessons learned from emergency-response exercises and operations , 2001 .

[16]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Web Service Orchestration in Public Administration: Challenges, Roles, and Growth Stages , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  Philippe Hoyois,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2006: Numbers and Trends , 2007 .

[18]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Pre-requisites for large scale coordination , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[19]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[20]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi‐contextuality in boundary‐spanning practices , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Andreas Hinterhuber,et al.  Value Chain Orchestration in Action and the Case of the Global Agrochemical Industry , 2002 .

[22]  B. S. Manoj,et al.  Communication challenges in emergency response , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Eric Stern,et al.  Crisis Decisionmaking: A Cognitive Institutional Approach , 1999 .

[24]  K. Weick The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster , 1990 .

[25]  David M. Dilts,et al.  The evolution of control architectures for automated manufacturing systems , 1991 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[27]  N. Kapucu Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies , 2006 .

[28]  Политология The 9/11 commission , 2004 .

[29]  Mie Nakatani,et al.  Information filtering for emergency management , 2000, Proceedings 9th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE RO-MAN 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8499).

[30]  Rohan Samarajiva,et al.  Mobilizing Information and Communications Technologies for Effective Disaster Warning: Lessons from the 2004 Tsunami , 2005 .

[31]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[32]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[33]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Power to the Edge: Command, Control in the Information Age , 2003 .

[34]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Peter Fu-Ming Hu,et al.  Challenges to remote emergency decision-making for disasters or Homeland Security , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[36]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Information flow during crisis management: challenges to coordination in the emergency operations center , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[37]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[38]  Rohan Samarajiva,et al.  Policy Commentary , 2005, New Media Soc..

[39]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[40]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[42]  Giri Kumar Tayi,et al.  Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments , 1999, CACM.

[43]  David S Alberts,et al.  Network Centric Warfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority , 1999 .

[44]  Rui Chen,et al.  Coordination in emergency response management , 2008, CACM.

[45]  Adrian J. Slywotzky,et al.  Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-And-Respond Organizations , 1999 .

[46]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[47]  E. Stern,et al.  The Politics of Crisis Management: References , 2005 .

[48]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[49]  Joanne E. Hale,et al.  A Layered Communication Architecture for the Support of Crisis Response , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  B. Verbeek The Politics of Crisis Management. Public Leadership Under Pressure , 2006 .

[53]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  The Conceptual Basis for Mediation Services , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[54]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[55]  Shoshana Loeb,et al.  Information filtering , 1992, CACM.

[56]  Peter Essens,et al.  Network centric operations in crisis management , 2008 .

[57]  E. Stern,et al.  The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure , 2005 .

[58]  G. K. Fry,et al.  The Politics of Crisis , 2001 .

[59]  W. Ashby,et al.  Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems , 1991 .

[60]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[61]  B. Chakravarthy Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management , 1982 .

[62]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[63]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001 , 2006 .

[64]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[65]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Special Section: Assuring Information Quality , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  Organisational learning and self-adaptation in dynamic disaster environments. , 2006, Disasters.

[67]  Javier Busquets,et al.  Orchestrating Smart Business Network dynamics for innovation , 2010 .

[68]  Jari Kaivo-oja,et al.  Wild cards, weak signals and organisational improvisation , 2004 .

[69]  L. Comfort Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response , 1999 .

[70]  Christopher Cooper,et al.  Disaster: Hurricane Katrina and the Failure of Homeland Security , 2006 .