Insights into the chemomechanical coupling of the myosin motor from simulation of its ATP hydrolysis mechanism.

The molecular motor myosin converts chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis into mechanical work, thus driving a variety of essential motility processes. Although myosin function has been studied extensively, the catalytic mechanism of ATP hydrolysis and its chemomechanical coupling to the motor cycle are not completely understood. Here, the catalysis mechanism in myosin II is examined using quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical reaction path calculations. The resulting reaction pathways, found in the catalytically competent closed/closed conformation of the Switch-1/Switch-2 loops of myosin, are all associative with a pentavalent bipyramidal oxyphosphorane transition state but can vary in the activation mechanism of the attacking water molecule and in the way the hydrogens are transferred between the heavy atoms. The coordination bond between the Mg2+ metal cofactor and Ser237 in the Switch-1 loop is broken in the product state, thereby facilitating the opening of the Switch-1 loop after hydrolysis is completed, which is required for subsequent strong rebinding to actin. This reveals a key element of the chemomechanical coupling that underlies the motor cycle, namely, the modulation of actin unbinding or binding in response to the ATP or ADP x P(i) state of nucleotide-bound myosin.

[1]  M. Karplus,et al.  Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems , 1996 .

[2]  Robert S. Mulliken,et al.  Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. II. Overlap Populations, Bond Orders, and Covalent Bond Energies , 1955 .

[3]  K. Schulten,et al.  On the mechanism of ATP hydrolysis in F1-ATPase. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[4]  F. Rotzinger Performance of molecular orbital methods and density functional theory in the computation of geometries and energies of metal aqua ions. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Myosin cleft movement and its coupling to actomyosin dissociation , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[6]  R. Cachau,et al.  Quantum chemical modeling of the GTP hydrolysis by the RAS-GAP protein complex. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[7]  A. Warshel,et al.  On the Reactivity of Phosphate Monoester Dianions in Aqueous Solution: Brønsted Linear Free-Energy Relationships Do Not Have an Unique Mechanistic Interpretation , 1998 .

[8]  R. Goody,et al.  Synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate at the myosin-subfragment 1 active site. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  R. Vale,et al.  Switches, latches, and amplifiers: common themes of G proteins and molecular motors , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Dynamics of actomyosin interactions in relation to the cross-bridge cycle. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  F. Westheimer,et al.  The hydrolysis of gamma-phenylpropyl di- and triphosphates. , 1966, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Qiang Cui,et al.  Mechanochemical coupling in myosin: A theoretical analysis with molecular dynamics and combined QM/MM reaction path calculations , 2004 .

[13]  K. Holmes The Molecular Mechanism of Muscle Contraction , 2000 .

[14]  J. Pople,et al.  Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 21. Small split-valence basis sets for first-row elements , 2002 .

[15]  G. H. Reed,et al.  Electron paramagnetic resonance studies of MN(II) complexes with myosin subfragment 1 and oxygen 17-labeled ligands. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  Self‐consistent molecular orbital methods. XXIII. A polarization‐type basis set for second‐row elements , 1982 .

[17]  D. Trentham,et al.  The stereochemical course of phosphoric residue transfer during the myosin ATPase reaction. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  D. Trentham,et al.  The mechanism of ATP hydrolysis catalyzed by myosin and actomyosin, using rapid reaction techniques to study oxygen exchange. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  Notker Rösch,et al.  AM1/d Parameters for Molybdenum , 2000 .

[20]  C A Smith,et al.  Active site comparisons highlight structural similarities between myosin and other P-loop proteins. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Donald G Truhlar,et al.  Benchmark database of barrier heights for heavy atom transfer, nucleophilic substitution, association, and unimolecular reactions and its use to test theoretical methods. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[22]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Mapping the transition state for ATP hydrolysis: implications for enzymatic catalysis. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[23]  Carl A. Morris,et al.  A structural state of the myosin V motor without bound nucleotide , 2003, Nature.

[24]  N. Okimoto,et al.  Theoretical studies of the ATP hydrolysis mechanism of myosin. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Walter Thiel,et al.  Extension of MNDO to d Orbitals: Parameters and Results for the Second-Row Elements and for the Zinc Group , 1996 .

[26]  J. Pople,et al.  Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules , 1972 .

[27]  R. O. Jones,et al.  ATP Hydrolysis in Water − A Density Functional Study , 2003 .

[28]  Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin , 1996 .

[29]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formation , 1997 .

[30]  Xiang-dong Li,et al.  Effects of Mutations in the γ-Phosphate Binding Site of Myosin on Its Motor Function* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  K. Schulten,et al.  Molecular mechanism of ATP hydrolysis in F_1-ATPase , 2003 .

[32]  Efthimios Kaxiras,et al.  A QM/MM Implementation of the Self-Consistent Charge Density Functional Tight Binding (SCC-DFTB) Method , 2001 .

[33]  M Karplus,et al.  Computer simulation and analysis of the reaction pathway of triosephosphate isomerase. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[34]  C. Lim,et al.  Factors governing the metal coordination number in metal complexes from Cambridge Structural Database analyses. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[35]  I. Ortega‐Blake,et al.  Toward an understanding of the hydrolysis of Mg-PPi. An ab initio study of the isomerization reactions of neutral and anionic Mg-pyrophosphate complexes , 1996 .

[36]  Parr,et al.  Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[37]  Frank Mueller,et al.  Preface , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing.

[38]  H. Fromm,et al.  Direct and 18-O-exchange measurements relevant to possible activated or phosphorylated states of myosin. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[39]  K C Holmes,et al.  Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[40]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Engineering Dictyostelium discoideum myosin II for the introduction of site-specific fluorescence probes , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[41]  P. Boyer,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ORTHOPHOSPHATE OXYGEN EXCHANGE CATALYZED BY MYOSIN, ACTOMYOSIN, AND MUSCLE FIBERS. , 1963, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  ENZYME MECHANISMS WITH HYBRID QUANTUM AND MOLECULAR MECHANICAL POTENTIALS.I. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1996 .

[43]  I. Rayment,et al.  Molecular dynamics analysis of structural factors influencing back door pi release in myosin. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[44]  D. York,et al.  Pseudorotation barriers of biological oxyphosphoranes: a challenge for simulations of ribozyme catalysis. , 2005, Chemistry.

[45]  P. Kollman,et al.  A classical and ab initio study of the interaction of the myosin triphosphate binding domain with ATP. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[46]  R. Alberty Thermodynamics of the hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate as a function of temperature, pH, pMg, and ionic strength , 2003 .

[47]  A. Becke Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange , 1993 .

[48]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Structural mechanism of the recovery stroke in the myosin molecular motor. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  R. Alberty Thermodynamics of Biochemical Reactions , 2003 .

[50]  J. Simons,et al.  How to choose a one-electron basis set to reliably describe a dipole-bound anion , 2000 .

[51]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Mechanism of a molecular valve in the halorhodopsin chloride pump. , 2005, Structure.

[52]  K. Holmes,et al.  The structural basis of muscle contraction. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[53]  A. Warshel,et al.  A Fundamental Assumption about OH- Attack in Phosphate Ester Hydrolysis Is Not Fully Justified , 1997 .

[54]  Krishnan Raghavachari,et al.  Electron Correlation Effects in Molecules , 1996 .

[55]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. 22. Small split-valence basis sets for second-row elements , 1980 .

[56]  John H. Young,et al.  Pseudorotation mechanism of ATP hydrolysis in muscle contraction , 1974, Nature.

[57]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  General atomic and molecular electronic structure system , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[58]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  The case for a common ancestor: kinesin and myosin motor proteins and G proteins , 1998, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[59]  Hiroshi Kagawa,et al.  Molecular Orbital Study of the Interaction between MgATP and the Myosin Motor Domain: The Highest Occupied Molecular Orbitals Indicate the Reaction Site of ATP Hydrolysis , 1999 .

[60]  M. Karplus,et al.  A mechanism for rotamase catalysis by the FK506 binding protein (FKBP). , 1993, Biochemistry.

[61]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H‐ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[62]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Kinetic resolution of a conformational transition and the ATP hydrolysis step using relaxation methods with a Dictyostelium myosin II mutant containing a single tryptophan residue. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[63]  Anselm H. C. Horn,et al.  AM1* parameters for phosphorus, sulfur and chlorine , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.

[64]  A. Warshel,et al.  Phosphate Ester Hydrolysis in Aqueous Solution: Associative versus Dissociative Mechanisms , 1998 .

[65]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Quantum mechanical calculations on phosphate hydrolysis reactions , 2000, Journal of Computational Chemistry.

[66]  T. L. Hill,et al.  Definitions of free energy levels in biochemical reactions , 1976, Nature.

[67]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Oxygen exchange in the gamma-phosphoryl group of protein-bound ATP during Mg2+-dependent adenosine triphosphatase activity of myosin. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  ATP Hydrolysis in the βTP and βDP Catalytic Sites of F1-ATPase , 2004 .

[69]  W. Kabsch,et al.  The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. , 1997, Science.

[70]  J. Spudich,et al.  Kinetic characterization of myosin head fragments with long-lived myosin.ATP states. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[71]  K. Holmes,et al.  Role of the salt-bridge between switch-1 and switch-2 of Dictyostelium myosin. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[72]  Anne Houdusse,et al.  Three myosin V structures delineate essential features of chemo‐mechanical transduction , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[73]  P. Boyer,et al.  The equivalence of phosphate oxygens for exchange and the hydrolysis characteristics revealed by the distribution of [18O]Pi species formed by myosin and actomyosin ATPase. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[74]  J. Berg,et al.  A millennial myosin census. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[75]  R. Goody,et al.  The binding constant of ATP to myosin S1 fragment. , 1977, European journal of biochemistry.

[76]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[77]  R. Alberty,et al.  Standard thermodynamic formation properties for the adenosine 5'-triphosphate series. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[78]  D. Koshland,et al.  Properties of the O18 exchange reaction catalyzed by heavy meromyosin. , 1963, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[79]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  ATP Hydrolysis in the b TP and b DP Catalytic Sites of F 1 -ATPase , 2004 .

[80]  J. Sellers,et al.  Myosins: a diverse superfamily. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[81]  J. Whisstock,et al.  Conservation within the myosin motor domain: implications for structure and function. , 1996, Structure.

[82]  J. Pople,et al.  Self‐Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XI. Molecular Orbital Theory of NMR Chemical Shifts , 1971 .

[83]  The missing link in the muscle cross-bridge cycle , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[84]  T. Brinck,et al.  Theoretical Studies of the Hydrolysis of the Methyl Phosphate Anion , 1999 .

[85]  D. Hackney,et al.  Analysis of positional isotope exchange in ATP by cleavage of the beta P-O gamma P bond. Demonstration of negligible positional isotope exchange by myosin. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[86]  A. Becke,et al.  Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[87]  A. Becker,et al.  A structural model for actin-induced nucleotide release in myosin , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[88]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Force-generating domain of myosin motor. , 1993, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[89]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Nonuniform charge scaling (NUCS): A practical approximation of solvent electrostatic screening in proteins , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[90]  Kenneth C Holmes,et al.  The molecular mechanism of muscle contraction. , 2005, Advances in protein chemistry.

[91]  George S. Hammond,et al.  A Correlation of Reaction Rates , 1955 .

[92]  N. Mochizuki,et al.  On the myosin catalysis of ATP hydrolysis. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[93]  Rasmus R. Schröder,et al.  Electron cryo-microscopy shows how strong binding of myosin to actin releases nucleotide , 2003, Nature.

[94]  M. Karplus,et al.  Conjugate peak refinement: an algorithm for finding reaction paths and accurate transition states in systems with many degrees of freedom , 1992 .

[95]  T Shimada,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Switch II Loop ofDictyostelium Myosin II* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[96]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of ATPase Mechanisms , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[97]  T Shimada,et al.  Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the switch I region in the ATPase site of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin II. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[98]  Brent A. Gregersen,et al.  Hybrid QM/MM study of thio effects in transphosphorylation reactions. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[99]  Clive R. Bagshaw,et al.  Resolution of conformational states of Dictyostelium myosin II motor domain using tryptophan (W501) mutants: implications for the open-closed transition identified by crystallography. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[100]  M. Parrinello,et al.  The nature and transport mechanism of hydrated hydroxide ions in aqueous solution , 2002, Nature.

[101]  D. York,et al.  Parameterization of semiempirical methods to treat nucleophilic attacks to biological phosphates: AM1/d parameters for phosphorus , 2003 .

[102]  J. Collins,et al.  Theoretical studies on the hydrolysis of mono-phosphate and tri-phosphate in gas phase and aqueous solution. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[103]  Ivan Rayment,et al.  The Structural Basis of the Myosin ATPase Activity* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[104]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Mechanism of primary proton transfer in bacteriorhodopsin. , 2004, Structure.

[105]  A. Warshel,et al.  Mechanistic alternatives in phosphate monoester hydrolysis: what conclusions can be drawn from available experimental data? , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[106]  Timothy Clark,et al.  Efficient diffuse function‐augmented basis sets for anion calculations. III. The 3‐21+G basis set for first‐row elements, Li–F , 1983 .