RRM: An incentive reputation model for promoting good behaviors in distributed systems

Reputation systems represent soft security mechanisms that complement traditional information security mechanisms. They are now widely used in online e-commerce markets and communities in order to stimulate good behaviors as well as to restrain adverse behaviors. This paper analyzes the limitations of the conversational reputation models and proposes an incentive reputation model called the resilient reputation model (RRM) for the distributed reputation systems. The objective of this reputation model is not only to encourage the users to provide good services and, therefore, to maximize the probability of good transaction outcomes, but also to punish those adverse users who are trying to manipulate the application systems. The simulation results indicate that the proposed reputation model (RRM) could effectively resist against the common adverse behaviors, while protecting the profits of sincere users from being blemished by those adversaries.

[1]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems , 2006, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[2]  Stephen Hailes,et al.  A distributed trust model , 1998, NSPW '97.

[3]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Keynote 2: Trust and Reputation Relationships in Service-Oriented Environments , 2005, ICITA.

[4]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Towards Incentive-Compatible Reputation Management , 2002, Trust, Reputation, and Security.

[5]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  Experience with an Object Reputation System for Peer-to-Peer Filesharing , 2006, NSDI.

[6]  Ling Liu,et al.  PeerTrust: supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[7]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Reputation Mechanism Design in Online Trading Environments with Pure Moral Hazard , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Boi Faltings,et al.  An incentive compatible reputation mechanism , 2003, EEE International Conference on E-Commerce, 2003. CEC 2003..

[9]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Michael J. North,et al.  Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit , 2006, TOMC.

[11]  Lars Rasmusson,et al.  Simulated social control for secure Internet commerce , 1996, NSPW '96.

[12]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[13]  P. Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2006 .

[14]  S. Marti,et al.  Taxonomy of trust : Categorizing P 2 P reputation systems q , 2005 .

[15]  George D. Stamoulis,et al.  Effective use of reputation in peer-to-peer environments , 2004, IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2004. CCGrid 2004..

[16]  J. Wooders,et al.  Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from Ebay , 2006 .

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  TRAVOS: Trust and Reputation in the Context of Inaccurate Information Sources , 2006, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[18]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .