Wavelet-based detection of gait events from inertial sensors: analysis of sensitivity to scale choice

Nowadays, inertial sensors have shown great popularity in gait analysis, thanks to their advantages in terms of costs, encumbrance and usability in outdoor settings. The accuracy achieved by inertial-based systems in detecting gait events is however not as high as that obtained with lab-based equipment, even if many authors have presented methods to fill this gap. In particular, the segmentation of gait patterns into different cycles, and the determination of the stance and swing parts of each cycle are two key phases in the gait analysis process, as they are needed to extract all the spatio-temporal parameters. Thus, an accurate detection of initial contact (IC) and final contact (FC) events is necessary. Among the different methods presented in the literature, we chose a wavelet-based one, which used the vertical component of the acceleration extracted from an inertial sensor on the waist, and we investigated the changes in detection accuracy when varying the numerical values of a parameter (i.e., the wavelet scale value). Gait patterns of five healthy subjects were recorded by a waist-mounted inertial sensor, and by a stereophotogrammetric system, taken as reference: IC and FC events were then extracted and compared, obtaining an estimation for each scale. Precision, Sensitivity, and $\rm F1_{\mathbf {score}}$ curves showed that IC events are well estimated in the range of scales 29–87, while FC events in the range 24–65, at a sampling frequency of 250 samples/s. In these ranges, mean error, variability and RMSE values showed lower values for the estimated IC events (RMSE<39 ms) than for the FC ones (RMSE<47 ms). A common accurate subrange of scales was then determined (29–37). Thus, this analysis confirmed the good accuracy of the wavelet-based method within a wide range of scales and showed how the scale choice influences the accuracy of the estimates.

[1]  Andrea Scorza,et al.  Experimental characterization of a novel fiber-optic accelerometer for the quantitative assessment of rest tremor in Parkinsonian patients , 2012, BioMed 2012.

[2]  Rafael C González,et al.  Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[3]  Diana Trojaniello,et al.  Accuracy, sensitivity and robustness of five different methods for the estimation of gait temporal parameters using a single inertial sensor mounted on the lower trunk. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[4]  Xiaoli Meng,et al.  Use of an Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Module for Pedestrian Tracking During Normal Walking , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[5]  P. Gorce,et al.  Analysis of several methods and inertial sensors locations to assess gait parameters in able-bodied subjects. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[6]  Shau-Shiun Jan,et al.  Observability Analysis and Performance Evaluation of EKF-Based Visual-Inertial Odometry With Online Intrinsic Camera Parameter Calibration , 2019, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[7]  Marco Donati,et al.  An enhanced estimate of initial contact and final contact instants of time using lower trunk inertial sensor data. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[8]  X. Shao,et al.  A novel method to calculate the approximate derivative photoacoustic spectrum using continuous wavelet transform , 2000, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[9]  Angelo M. Sabatini,et al.  Kalman-Filter-Based Orientation Determination Using Inertial/Magnetic Sensors: Observability Analysis and Performance Evaluation , 2011, Sensors.

[10]  E. Martin Real time patient's gait monitoring through wireless accelerometers with the wavelet transform , 2011, 2011 IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems.

[11]  Cristiano De Marchis,et al.  Gait parameters are differently affected by concurrent smartphone-based activities with scaled levels of cognitive effort , 2017, PloS one.

[12]  Cheng Jinhui,et al.  Application of the wavelet transforms on axial strain calculation in ultrasound elastography , 2006 .

[13]  Antonio M. López,et al.  Pedestrian Navigation Based on a Waist-Worn Inertial Sensor , 2012, Sensors.

[14]  John R. Rebula,et al.  Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[15]  Jorunn L Helbostad,et al.  Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  A. Hof,et al.  Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[17]  Francesco Orsini,et al.  A preliminary uncertainty analysis of acceleration and displacement measurements on a novel WBV platform for biologic response studies , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA).

[18]  S. Conforto,et al.  Spatio-temporal gait parameters as estimated from wearable sensors placed at different waist levels , 2016, 2016 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[19]  Yu-Liang Hsu,et al.  A Wearable Inertial Measurement System With Complementary Filter for Gait Analysis of Patients With Stroke or Parkinson’s Disease , 2016, IEEE Access.

[20]  R. B. Davis,et al.  A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique , 1991 .

[21]  Silvia Conforto,et al.  Varying behavior of different window sizes on the classification of static and dynamic physical activities from a single accelerometer. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.