Exponential separation of quantum and classical communication complexity

Communication complexity has become a central completity model. In that model, we count the amount of communication bits needed between two parties in order to solve certain computational problems. We show that for certain communication complezity problems quantum communication protocols are exponentially faster than classical ores. More explicitly, we give an example for a communication complexity relation (0~ promise problem) P such that: 1) The quantum communication complexity of P is O(log m). 2) The classical probabilistic communication complexity of P is Q(m’l’/ logm). (where m is the length of the inputs). This gives an ezponential gap between quantum communication complexity and classical probabilistic communication complexity. Only a quadratic gap was previously known. Our problem P is of geometrical nature, and is a finite precision variation of the following problem: Player I gets as input a unit vector z E R” and two orthogonal subspaces MO, MI c R”. Player II gets as input an orthogonal matrixT : R” + R”. Their goal is to answer 0 if T(x) E MO and 1 if T(x) E M,, (and any an~luer in any other case). We give an almost tight analysis for the quantum communication complexity and for the classical-probabilistic communication complexity of this problem.

[1]  A. Holevo Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel , 1973 .

[2]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Some complexity questions related to distributive computing(Preliminary Report) , 1979, STOC.

[3]  V. Milman,et al.  Asymptotic Theory Of Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces , 1986 .

[4]  Bala Kalyanasundaram,et al.  The Probabilistic Communication Complexity of Set Intersection , 1992, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[5]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Monotone circuits for connectivity require super-logarithmic depth , 1990, STOC '88.

[6]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Monotone Circuits for Connectivity Require Super-Logarithmic Depth , 1990, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[7]  Ilan Newman,et al.  Private vs. Common Random Bits in Communication Complexity , 1991, Inf. Process. Lett..

[8]  Noga Alon,et al.  The Probabilistic Method , 2015, Fundamentals of Ramsey Theory.

[9]  Alexander A. Razborov,et al.  On the Distributional Complexity of Disjointness , 1992, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Quantum complexity theory , 1993, STOC.

[11]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[12]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Quantum Circuit Complexity , 1993, FOCS.

[13]  R. Hughes,et al.  Quantum Cryptography , 1995, quant-ph/9504002.

[14]  Weinfurter,et al.  Dense coding in experimental quantum communication. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[15]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Experimental quantum teleportation , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Lov K. Grover Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack , 1997, quant-ph/9706033.

[17]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Quantum Complexity Theory , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[18]  John Preskill,et al.  Lecture notes on quantum information and quantum computation~ http://www , 1998 .

[19]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Quantum vs. classical communication and computation , 1998, STOC '98.

[20]  Andris Ambainis,et al.  The quantum communication complexity of sampling , 1998, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[21]  Lov K. Grover,et al.  Quantum computation , 1999, Proceedings Twelfth International Conference on VLSI Design. (Cat. No.PR00013).

[22]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..