The Stern–Gerlach experiment is notoriously counter-intuitive. The official theory is that the spin of a fermion remains always aligned with the magnetic field. Its directions are thus quantized: It can only be spin-up or spin-down. However, that theory is based on mathematical errors in the way it (mis)treats spinors and group theory. We present here a mathematically rigorous theory for a fermion in a magnetic field, which is no longer counter-intuitive. It is based on an understanding of spinors in SU(2) which is only Euclidean geometry. Contrary to what Pauli has been reading into the Stern–Gerlach experiment, the spin directions are not quantized. The new corrected paradigm, which solves all conceptual problems, is that the fermions precess around the magnetic-field just as Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. Surprisingly, this leads to only two energy states, which should be qualified as precession-up and precession-down rather than spin-up and spin-down. Indeed, despite the presence of the many different possible angles θ between the spin axis s and the magnetic field B, the fermions can only have two possible energies m0c2±μB. The values ±μB thus do not correspond to the continuum of values −μ·B Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term V=−μ·B is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies ±μB, and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy ±μB are not potential-energy states. We also explain the mathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clear and understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.
[1]
O. Stern,et al.
Der experimentelle Nachweis des magnetischen Moments des Silberatoms
,
1922
.
[2]
A. Hansen,et al.
Klein's Paradox and Its Resolution
,
1981
.
[3]
L. Biedenharn,et al.
The Theory of Spinors
,
1983
.
[4]
D. Bohm.
A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II
,
1952
.
[5]
A proposal to get some common-sense intuition for the paradox of the double-slit experiment
,
2016
.
[6]
H. Everett.
"Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
,
1957
.
[7]
S. Komura,et al.
[Neutron spin echo].
,
1985,
Tanpakushitsu kakusan koso. Protein, nucleic acid, enzyme.
[8]
A. Einstein,et al.
Quantentheoretische Bemerkungen zum Experiment von Stern und Gerlach
,
1922
.
[9]
Ruth E. Kastner,et al.
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
,
2012
.
[10]
Wolfgang Pauli.
Zur Quantenmechanik des magnetischen Elektrons
,
.