An Enduring Philosophical Agenda. Worldview Construction as a Philosophical Method

Is there such a thing as a philosophical method? It seems that there are as many philosophical methods as there are philosophies. A method is any procedure employed to achieve a certain aim. So, before proposing a method, we have to tackle the delicate question: “what is the aim of philosophy?”. At the origin of philosophy, there is a questioning about the world. The worldview approach developed by Leo Apostel (Apostel, Van der Veken 1991) elegantly explicit those fundamental questions. As we answer them, we come up with a worldview. Using this framework, this paper consider answering this enduring philosophical agenda as the primary aim of philosophy. However, we argue that philosophical worldviews constitute a particular class of possible worldviews. With the help of three analogies, we give guidelines to construct such worldviews. The next step is to compare the relative strength of philosophical worldviews. Precise evaluation standards to compare and confront worldviews are proposed. Some problems for worldview diffusion are then expounded. We close with basic hypotheses to build an integrative philosophical worldview.

[1]  John Carvalho,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE STRUCTURE OF A SCIENTIFIC WORLDVIEW , 2006 .

[2]  Albert M. Wolters,et al.  On The Idea of Worldview and Its Relation to Philosophy , 2009 .

[3]  Cliff Joslyn,et al.  Synopsys of the Principia Cybernetica Project , 1993 .

[4]  N. Shackel.  The Vacuity of Postmodernist Methodology , 2005 .

[5]  Helaine L. Harris PsyD,et al.  From Fragmentation to Integration , 2000 .

[6]  Y. I. Kim.  [General systems theory]. , 1989, Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse.

[7]  Immanuel Kant.  Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft , 2004 .

[8]  Immanuel Kant,et al.  Kritik der praktischen Vernunft , 2003 .

[9]  Otto Neurath.  Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis , 1973 .

[10]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Objective, Subjective and Intersubjective Selectors of Knowledge , 1997 .

[11]  N. Rescher.  The Strife of Systems: An Essay on the Grounds and Implications of Philosophical Diversity , 1985 .

[12]  G. Ferro-Luzzi.  On Evolutionary Epistemology , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[13]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Global Progress I: empirical evidence for increasing quality of life , 2000 .

[14]  Charles V. Jones,et al.  Pascal, Blaise , 2003 .

[15]  F. Heylighen.  The Global Superorganism: An Evolutionary-cybernetic Model of the Emerging Network Society , 2007 .

[16]  R. Khatun,et al.  A WORLD VIEW: , 2002 .

[17]  Edna Hines.  Philosophy , 1932 .

[18]  J. Stewart.  Evolution's Arrow: the direction of evolution and the future of humanity , 2000 .

[19]  W. Stoeger,et al.  Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding , 1991 .

[20]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Philosophical Reasoning: A Study in the Methodology of Philosophizing , 2001 .

[21]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[22]  C. W. Tate.  Solve it. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[23]  P. Russell.  The Global Brain Awakens: Our Next Evolutionary Leap , 1995 .

[24]  David K. Naugle,et al.  Worldview: The History of a Concept , 2003 .

[25]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  World Views From fragmentation to integration , 2007 .

[26]  P. Wiener,et al.  The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. , 1968 .