Somatosensory P2 reflects resource allocation in a game task: assessment with an irrelevant probe technique using electrical probe stimuli to shoulders.

The present study investigated whether event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by task irrelevant somatosensory stimuli to the shoulders reflect the amount of processing resources allocated to a game task. In the experiment, electrical stimuli were presented to the right (or left) shoulder with a high probability (80%) and to the other shoulder with a low probability (20%) while participants were performing a driving simulation game. The deviant low-probability stimuli elicited somatosensory P2, and this P2 amplitude decreased when the task was difficult. The results show that the ERPs for somatosensory stimuli to the shoulders can reflect the amount of resources deployed even when the stimuli are ignored. This is a useful method for the evaluation of mental workloads in complex circumstances because it does not interfere with inputs of auditory or visual information or operations using the limbs.

[1]  Darryl G. Humphrey,et al.  Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[2]  T. Wasaka,et al.  Resource allocation and somatosensory P300 amplitude during dual task: effects of tracking speed and predictability of tracking direction , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Helge Gillmeister,et al.  ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[5]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[6]  T. Kida,et al.  Dual-task repetition alters event-related brain potentials and task performance , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[8]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  C. Braun,et al.  Somatosensory event-related potentials to painful and non-painful stimuli: effects of attention , 1989, Pain.

[10]  U. Erdmann,et al.  Auditory probe sensitivity to mental workload changes - an event-related potential study. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[12]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Passive enhancement of the somatosensory P100 and N140 in an active attention task using deviant alone condition , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  C D Wickens,et al.  Assessment of pilot performance and mental workload in rotary wing aircraft. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[14]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[16]  H. Yabe,et al.  Somatosensory automatic responses to deviant stimuli. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  J. Johnstone,et al.  Probe evoked potentials: theory, method and applications. , 1984, The International journal of neuroscience.