Damage potential reduction of optimally passive-controlled nonlinear structures

Abstract The use of energy dissipation devices as an earthquake resistant system is an increasing area of practical application worldwide. They are used as seismic protection systems in order to enhance structural performance by increasing inherent damping, raising safety, controlling deformations and balancing asymmetric conditions among others, thus reducing ideally the overall damage potential of the structures. Few codes have been developed for the analysis and design of these structures and the existing ones are still evolving. A key parameter that requires special attention is the added damping – reduced shear base design relationship due to, in a philosophical sense, seismic protected structures should assure the assumed performance enhancement. A comprehensive study of the added damping – structural strength relationship is conducted through three stages. The first stage is focused on nonlinear single degree of freedom systems, the second is extended to nonlinear 2-DOF systems in order to consider the torsional condition, and lastly a real eight story frame is analyzed. Structural performance is estimated via fragility curves constructed through the Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Damage is estimated through the Park and Ang index which is composed of two main parameters, the first related to damage caused by ductility demand, the second related to structural hysteretic dissipated energy. An ensemble of 42 Chilean accelerograms recorded at the M w 8.8 2010 Maule Earthquake scaled to fifteen increasing intensities is considered. An optimal plan and height distribution of damping capacities is considered for the 2-DOF system and the eight story frame respectively. The Simplified Sequential Search Algorithm is the optimization technique implemented. Besides fragility curves, an added damping – strength capacity chart is presented as a decision-making tool. Structural strength reductions should be carefully considered in order to assure an effective damage potential reduction, especially when dealing with asymmetric structures.

[1]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[2]  Iolanda Gabriela Craifaleanu Influence of Damping on Seismic Strength Reduction Factors: A Study Differentiated by Ground Motion Frequency Bandwidth , 2013 .

[3]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Torsional balance as new design criterion for asymmetric structures with energy dissipation devices , 2009 .

[4]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[5]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Damage-Limiting Aseismic Design of Buildings , 1987 .

[6]  A. Zambrano,et al.  Damage indices evaluation for seismic resistant structures subjected to low-cycle fatigue phenomena , 2014 .

[7]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Alfredo H.-S. Ang,et al.  Damage Estimation of Existing Bridge Structures , 1993 .

[9]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review , 1995 .

[10]  A. S. Cakmak,et al.  Detection of seismic structural damage using parameter-based global damage indices , 1990 .

[11]  Enrique Del Valle,et al.  Diseño sismico de edificios , 1981 .

[12]  M. De Iuliis,et al.  Torsional seismic response control of asymmetric-plan systems by using viscous dampers , 2008 .

[13]  STEFANO PAMPANIN,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRAME STRUCTURES INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS. PART II: MULTI-DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[14]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Efficiency of a simple approach to damper allocation in MDOF structures , 2002 .

[15]  Amador Teran-Gilmore,et al.  STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS FOR DUCTILE STRUCTURES WITH PASSIVE ENERGY DISSIPATING DEVICES , 2003 .

[16]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Performance based seismic design , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Evaluation of Simplified Methods of Analysis of Yielding Structures with Damping Systems , 2002 .

[18]  Panagiotis E. Mergos,et al.  Seismic damage analysis including inelastic shear–flexure interaction , 2010 .

[19]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of structures , 2007 .

[20]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[21]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  TOWARDS PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF MDOF STRUCTURES WITH EXPLICIT CONSIDERATION OF RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS , 2004 .

[22]  A. Penna,et al.  A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses , 2010 .

[23]  J. Aguirre,et al.  Optimal control of linear and nonlinear asymmetric structures by means of passive energy dampers , 2013 .

[24]  Izuru Takewaki Building Control with Passive Dampers: Optimal Performance-based Design for Earthquakes , 2009 .

[25]  A. Ang,et al.  Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 1985 .

[26]  Amador Terán Gilmore,et al.  DISEÑO POR DESEMPEÑO DE ESTRUCTURAS DÚCTILES DE CONCRETO REFORZADO UBICADAS EN LA ZONA DEL LAGO DEL DISTRITO FEDERAL: LA RESISTENCIA LATERAL DE DISEÑO , 2008 .

[27]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: A comparison between different methods , 1993 .

[28]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty , 2010 .

[29]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[30]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Analytical evaluation of essential facilities fragility curves by using a stochastic approach , 2011 .

[31]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Inelastic Seismic Response of R/C Structures , 1990 .

[32]  Constantin Christopoulos,et al.  Performance spectra based method for the seismic design of structures equipped with passive supplemental damping systems , 2013 .

[33]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Response of elastic and inelastic structures with damping systems to near-field and soft-soil ground motions , 2004 .

[34]  Emmanuel Ferrier,et al.  Performance indices to assess the efficiency of external FRP retrofitting of reinforced concrete short columns for seismic strengthening , 2012 .

[35]  Siddhartha Ghosh,et al.  Estimation of the Park–Ang damage index for planar multi-storey frames using equivalent single-degree systems , 2011 .

[36]  J. M. Chandra Kishen,et al.  Damage indices for failure of concrete beams under fatigue , 2008 .

[37]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  An Assessment to Benchmark the Seismic Performance of a Code-Conforming Reinforced-Concrete Moment-Frame Building , 2008 .

[38]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Validation of the 2000 NEHRP Provisions’ Equivalent Lateral Force and Modal Analysis Procedures for Buildings with Damping Systems , 2003 .

[39]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Equivalent Lateral Force and Modal Analysis Procedures of the 2000 NEHRP Provisions for Buildings with Damping Systems , 2003 .

[40]  Ersin Aydin Optimal damper placement based on base moment in steel building frames , 2012 .

[41]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  A new damage index for plane steel frames exhibiting strength and stiffness degradation under seismic motion , 2013 .

[42]  M. Constantinou,et al.  Elastic and Inelastic Seismic Response of Buildings with Damping Systems , 2002 .

[43]  Ashkan Sharifi,et al.  A strain-consistent approach for determination of bounds of ductility damage index for different performance levels for seismic design of RC frame members , 2012 .

[44]  Diego Lo´pez Garci´a A Simple Method for the Design of Optimal Damper Configurations in MDOF Structures , 2001 .