Global sagittal axis: a step toward full-body assessment of sagittal plane deformity in the human body.

OBJECTIVE Sagittal malalignment requires higher energy expenditure to maintain an erect posture. Because the clinical impact of sagittal alignment is affected by both the severity of the deformity and recruitment of compensatory mechanisms, it is important to investigate new parameters that reflect both disability level and compensatory mechanisms for all patients. This study investigated the clinical relevance of the global sagittal axis (GSA), a novel measure to evaluate the standing axis of the human body. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent full-body radiographs and completed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and the visual analog scale for back and leg pain. The GSA was defined as the angle formed by a line from the midpoint of the femoral condyles to the center of C-7, and a line from the midpoint between the femoral condyles to the posterior superior corner of the S-1 sacral endplate. After evaluating the correlation of GSA/HRQOL with sagittal parameters, linear regression models were generated to investigate how ODI and GSA related to radiographic parameters (T-1 pelvic angle, pelvic retroversion, knee flexion, and pelvic posterior translation). RESULTS One hundred forty-three patients (mean age 44 years) were included. The GSA correlated significantly with all HRQOL (up to r = 0.6 with EQ-5D) and radiographic parameters (up to r = 0.962 with sagittal vertical axis). Regression between ODI and sagittal radiographic parameters identified the GSA as an independent predictor (r = 0.517, r2 = 0.267; p < 0.001). Analysis of standardized coefficients revealed that when controlling for deformity, the GSA increased with a concurrent decrease in pelvic retroversion (-0.837) and increases in knee flexion (+0.287) and pelvic posterior translation (+0.193). CONCLUSIONS The GSA is a simple, novel measure to assess the standing axis of the human body in the sagittal plane. The GSA correlated highly with spinopelvic and lower-extremities sagittal parameters and exhibited remarkable correlations with HRQOL, which exceeded other commonly used parameters.

[1]  M. Hongo,et al.  Improvement of spinal alignment and quality of life after corrective surgery for spinal kyphosis in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study with non-operated patients , 2015, Osteoporosis International.

[2]  F. Schwab,et al.  Recruitment of Compensatory Mechanisms in Sagittal Spinal Malalignment Is Age and Regional Deformity Dependent: A Full-Standing Axis Analysis of Key Radiographical Parameters , 2015, Spine.

[3]  F. Schwab,et al.  Management of Flatback and Related Kyphotic Decompensation Syndromes , 1997, Spine.

[4]  W. Skalli,et al.  Global Sagittal Alignment Analysis Including Lower Extremities: Role of Pelvic Translation and the Lower Extremities in Compensation for Spinal Deformity , 2014 .

[5]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Spinal Deformity—Postoperative Standing Imbalance: How Much Can You Tolerate? An Overview of Key Parameters in Assessing Alignment and Planning Corrective Surgery , 2010, Spine.

[6]  F. Pellisé,et al.  The Reliability of Sagittal Pelvic Parameters: The Effect of Lumbosacral Instrumentation and Measurement Experience , 2015, Spine.

[7]  Malhar N. Kumar,et al.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[8]  William Horton,et al.  The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity , 2005, Spine.

[9]  M. Rousseau,et al.  THA Patients in Standing and Sitting Positions: A Prospective Evaluation Using the Low-Dose “Full-Body” EOS® Imaging System , 2012 .

[10]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Gravity Line Analysis in Adult Volunteers: Age-Related Correlation With Spinal Parameters, Pelvic Parameters, and Foot Position , 2006, Spine.

[11]  C. Schmidt,et al.  A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  S. Ozeki,et al.  Minimum 20 Years Long-term Clinical Outcome After Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation for Scoliosis: Comparison of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire With That in Nonscoliosis Group , 2015, Spine.

[13]  Seung-Wook Baek,et al.  The relationship between the spinopelvic balance and the incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty , 2015, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  G. Saillant,et al.  Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning , 2004, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[15]  C. Werner,et al.  Hyperlordosis is Associated With Facet Joint Pathology at the Lower Lumbar Spine , 2013, Clinical spine surgery.

[16]  Ashish Patel,et al.  Pelvic Tilt and Truncal Inclination: Two Key Radiographic Parameters in the Setting of Adults With Spinal Deformity , 2009, Spine.

[17]  Jean-Marc Vital,et al.  Global analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in major deformities: correlation between lack of lumbar lordosis and flexion of the knee , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[18]  Kazuhisa Takahashi,et al.  The knee-spine syndrome. Association between lumbar lordosis and extension of the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.