Insights from a Simple Expression for Linear Fisher Information in a Recurrently Connected Population of Spiking Neurons

A simple expression for a lower bound of Fisher information is derived for a network of recurrently connected spiking neurons that have been driven to a noise-perturbed steady state. We call this lower bound linear Fisher information, as it corresponds to the Fisher information that can be recovered by a locally optimal linear estimator. Unlike recent similar calculations, the approach used here includes the effects of nonlinear gain functions and correlated input noise and yields a surprisingly simple and intuitive expression that offers substantial insight into the sources of information degradation across successive layers of a neural network. Here, this expression is used to (1) compute the optimal (i.e., information-maximizing) firing rate of a neuron, (2) demonstrate why sharpening tuning curves by either thresholding or the action of recurrent connectivity is generally a bad idea, (3) show how a single cortical expansion is sufficient to instantiate a redundant population code that can propagate across multiple cortical layers with minimal information loss, and (4) show that optimal recurrent connectivity strongly depends on the covariance structure of the inputs to the network.

[1]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[2]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[3]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding with Correlation and an Unfaithful Model , 2001, Neural Computation.

[4]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of correlations in stochastic neural networks. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding and Decoding in a Neural Field: A Computational Study , 2002, Neural Computation.

[7]  André Longtin,et al.  Delayed excitatory and inhibitory feedback shape neural information transmission. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  M. Sur,et al.  Invariant computations in local cortical networks with balanced excitation and inhibition , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Pouget,et al.  Tuning curve sharpening for orientation selectivity: coding efficiency and the impact of correlations , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Spiking Neuron Models , 2002 .

[12]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Fisher information for spike-based population decoding. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[13]  H. Risken The Fokker-Planck equation : methods of solution and applications , 1985 .

[14]  H. Risken Fokker-Planck Equation , 1996 .

[15]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Noise in Integrate-and-Fire Neurons: From Stochastic Input to Escape Rates , 2000, Neural Computation.

[17]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Spiking Neuron Models: An Introduction , 2002 .

[18]  G. Orban,et al.  Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons , 2001, Nature.

[19]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  The Effect of Correlations on the Fisher Information of Population Codes , 1998, NIPS.

[20]  Christian W. Eurich,et al.  Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[21]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Nonlinear Population Codes , 2004, Neural Computation.

[22]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[23]  Henning Sprekeler,et al.  Inhibitory Plasticity Balances Excitation and Inhibition in Sensory Pathways and Memory Networks , 2011, Science.

[24]  Alex K. Susemihl,et al.  Dynamic state estimation based on Poisson spike trains—towards a theory of optimal encoding , 2012, 1209.5559.

[25]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[26]  N. Qian,et al.  Learning and adaptation in a recurrent model of V1 orientation selectivity. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Elgin The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications , 1984 .

[29]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[31]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[32]  W. Michael Brown,et al.  Optimal Neuronal Tuning for Finite Stimulus Spaces , 2004, Neural Computation.