Emission Pathways Towards a Low-Carbon Energy System for Europe: A Model-Based Analysis of Decarbonization Scenarios

The aim of this paper is to showcase different decarbonization pathways for Germany and Europe with varying Carbon dioxide (CO2) constraints until 2050. The Global Energy System Model (GENeSYS-MOD) framework, a linear mathematical optimization model, is used to compute low-carbon scenarios for Europe as a whole, as well as for 17 European countries or regions. The sectors power, low- and high-temperature heating, and passenger and freight transportation are included, with the model endogenously constructing capacities in each period. Emission constraints differ between different scenarios and are either optimized endogenously by the model, or distributed on a per-capita basis, GDP-dependent, or based on current emissions. The results show a rapid phase-in of renewable energies, if a carbon budget in line with established climate targets is chosen. In the 2° pathway, the power and low-temperature heat sectors are mostly decarbonized by 2035, with the other sectors following. Wind power is the most important energy source in Europe by 2050, followed by solar energy and hydro power. The heating sector is dominated by biogas and heat pumps, while electric vehicles emerge in the transportation sector in the later periods. Differences in renewable potentials lead to different developments in the regions, e.g., converting Germany from a net exporter of electricity into an importing country by 2050. In the 1.5° pathway, not all calculations are feasible, showcasing that especially countries like Poland or the Balkan region that heavily rely on fossil fuels will face difficulties transitioning away from their current generation capacities. It can, however, be shown that the achievement of the 2° target can be met with low additonal costs compared to the business as usual case, while reducing total emissions by more than 30%.

[1]  Christian Breyer,et al.  Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[2]  Pierre Desprairies,et al.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[3]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World , 2017 .

[4]  Casimir Lorenz,et al.  dynELMOD: A Dynamic Investment and Dispatch Model for the Future European Electricity Market , 2017 .

[5]  C. Kemfert,et al.  European electricity sector decarbonization under different levels of foresight , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[6]  Antonella Battaglini,et al.  Moving towards 100% renewable electricity in Europe & North Africa by 2050 , 2011 .

[7]  Robert W. Howarth,et al.  Methane emissions and climatic warming risk from hydraulic fracturing and shale gas development: implications for policy , 2015 .

[8]  G. Pleßmann,et al.  How to meet EU GHG emission reduction targets? A model based decarbonization pathway for Europe's electricity supply system until 2050 , 2017 .

[9]  Semida Silveira,et al.  OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System: An introduction to its ethos, structure and development , 2011 .

[10]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[11]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, and solar , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Scenarios for decarbonizing the European electricity sector , 2017, 2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[13]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  Decarbonizing the Indian Energy System until 2050 , 2017 .

[14]  Albert Moser,et al.  Large-scale Integration of Renewable Energies and Impact on Storage Demand in a European Renewable Power System of 2050☆ , 2015 .

[15]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data , 2016 .

[16]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  How a "Low Carbon" Innovation Can Fail--Tales from a "Lost Decade" for Carbon Capture, Transport, and Sequestration (CCTS) , 2012 .

[17]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  Designing a Model for the Global Energy System—GENeSYS-MOD: An Application of the Open-Source Energy Modeling System (OSeMOSYS) , 2017 .

[18]  Martin Greiner,et al.  Storage and balancing synergies in a fully or highly renewable pan-European power system , 2012 .

[19]  Manuel Welsch,et al.  Modelling elements of Smart Grids – Enhancing the OSeMOSYS (Open Source Energy Modelling System) code , 2012 .

[20]  W. Schill,et al.  Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: Results and sensitivities , 2017 .

[21]  Roman Mendelevitch,et al.  Modeling a Carbon Capture, Transport, and Storage Infrastructure for Europe , 2014, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[22]  P. Baer,et al.  The Three Salient Global Mitigation Pathways Assessed in Light of the IPCC Carbon Budgets , 2013 .

[23]  M. A. Cameron,et al.  The United States can keep the grid stable at low cost with 100% clean, renewable energy in all sectors despite inaccurate claims , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Yvonne Scholz,et al.  Renewable energy based electricity supply at low costs - Development of the REMix model and application for Europe , 2012 .

[25]  Vivien Foster,et al.  Understanding CO2 emissions from the global energy sector , 2014 .

[26]  L. Cremonese,et al.  The Uncertain Climate Cost of Natural Gas , 2017 .

[27]  P. Sands The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1992 .

[28]  S. Hales,et al.  Climate change and human health: present and future risks , 2006, The Lancet.