Joining semi-closed gas turbine cycle and tri-reforming: SCGT-TRIREF as a proposal for low CO2 emissions powerplants

Abstract Methane conversion to a rich H 2 fuel by reforming reactions is a largely applied industrial process. Recently, it has been considered for applications combined to gas turbine powerplants, as a mean for (I) chemical recuperation (i.e. chemical looping CRGT) and (II) decarbonising the primary fuel and make the related power cycle a low CO 2 releaser. The possibility of enhancing methane conversion by the addition of CO 2 to the steam reactant flow (i.e. tri-reforming) has been assessed and showed interesting results. When dealing with gas turbines, the possibility of applying tri-reforming is related to the availability of some CO 2 into the fluegas going to the reformer. This happens in semi-closed gas turbine cycles (SCGT), where the fluegas has a typical 14–15% CO 2 mass content. The possibility of joining CRGT and SCGT technologies to improve methane reforming and propose an innovative, low CO 2 emissions gas turbine cycle was assessed here. One of the key issues of this joining is also the possibility of greatly reduce the external water consumption due to the reforming, as the SCGT is a water producer cycle. The SCGT-TRIREF cycle is an SCGT cycle where fuel tri-reforming is applied. The steam due to the reformer is generated by the vaporization of the condensed water coming out from the fluegas condensing heat exchanger, upstream the main compressor, where the exhausts are cooled down and partially recirculated. The heat due to the steam generation is recuperated from the turbine exhausts cooling. The reforming process is partially sustained by the heat recovered from the turbine exhausts (which generates superheated steam) and partially by the auto thermal reactions of methane with fresh air, coming from the compressor (i.e. partial combustion). The effect of CO 2 on methane reforming (tri-reforming effect) increases with decreasing steam/methane ratio: at very low values, around 30% of methane is converted by reactions with CO 2 . At high values of steam/methane ratio, the steam reforming reactions are dominant and only a marginal fraction of methane is interested to tri-reforming. Under optimised conditions, which can be reached at relatively high pressure ratios (25–30), the power cycle showed a potential efficiency around 46% and specific work at 550 kJ/kg level. When the amine CO 2 capture is applied, the specific CO 2 emissions range between 45 and 55 g CO 2 / kW h .

[1]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  The Recuperative Auto Thermal Reforming and Recuperative Reforming Gas Turbine Power Cycles With CO2 Removal—Part II: The Recuperative Reforming Cycle , 2004 .

[2]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[3]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Semi–Closed Hat (SC-HAT) Power Cycle , 2000 .

[4]  Roda Bounaceur,et al.  Membrane processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: A parametric study , 2006 .

[5]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Two Second-Generation SCGT Plant Proposals , 1998 .

[6]  Chunshan Song.  Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing , 2006 .

[7]  Keith D. King,et al.  Reforming of CH4 by partial oxidation: thermodynamic and kinetic analyses , 2001 .

[8]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Exergy analysis of the recuperative auto thermal reforming (R-ATR) and recuperative reforming (R-REF) power cycles with CO2 removal , 2004 .

[9]  R. Nihart,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of the MATIANT cycle , 1999 .

[10]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  SCGT/CC: An innovative cycle with advanced environmental and peakload shaving features , 1997 .

[11]  Daniele Cocco,et al.  Performance Assessment of Semi-Closed Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Systems , 2000 .

[12]  Chunshan Song,et al.  Tri-reforming of methane: a novel concept for catalytic production of industrially useful synthesis gas with desired H2/CO ratios , 2004 .

[13]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  The air membrane-ATR integrated gas turbine power cycle : A method for producing electricity with low CO2 emissions , 2005 .

[14]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel , 2003 .

[15]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  The Recuperative-Auto Thermal Reforming and the Recuperative-Reforming Gas Turbine Power Cycles With CO2 Removal—Part I: The Recuperative-Auto Thermal Reforming Cycle , 2003 .

[16]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Prospects for Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies Assuming Their Technological Learning , 2004 .

[17]  Amornvadee Veawab,et al.  Integration of CO2 capture unit using single- and blended-amines into supercritical coal-fired power plants: Implications for emission and energy management , 2007 .

[18]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Exergy analysis of gas-turbine combined cycle with CO2 capture using auto-thermal reforming of natural gas , 2000 .

[19]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Combined Cycles Using Latest Generation Gas Turbines , 2000 .

[20]  Timothy E. Fout,et al.  Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program ☆ , 2008 .

[21]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part II: Steam-Methane Reforming , 2002 .

[22]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part I: Partial Oxidation , 2002 .

[23]  Lidia Lombardi,et al.  Life cycle assessment comparison of technical solutions for CO2 emissions reduction in power generation , 2003 .

[24]  Lidia Lombardi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of a semi-closed gas turbine cycle with CO2 chemical absorption , 2001 .