Flexural performance of innovative sustainable composite steel-concrete beams

Abstract Composite beams comprising of concrete slabs and steel beams joined by conventional headed stud shear connectors are commonly used in modern steel-framed building construction. However, because the headed stud shear connectors are welded onto the top flange of the steel beam and cast into the in situ concrete slab, deconstruction of the composite beam and the reuse of its components at the end of structural life in defence to demolition is virtually impossible, which is at odds with the increasing demands placed on improving the sustainability of building infrastructure. As an alternative, an innovative sustainable composite beam and slab system is proposed, in which precast geopolymer concrete panels are attached to the steel beams using high-strength friction-grip bolts instead of cast in situ floors with pre-welded headed stud connectors. The advantages of a low-carbon design, both by the use of geopolymer concrete elements and system deconstructability, can be achieved in this proposed system. In this paper, a three-dimensional finite element model is developed to investigate the structural behaviour of the proposed sustainable composite beam and slab system. Material non-linearities and the interaction of the structural components are included in the model. The accuracy and reliability of the finite element formulation developed are validated by comparisons with experimental results. Extensive parametric studies are conducted to elucidate the effects of the change in the concrete panel configuration, the number and diameter of the bolts, the type and strength of the concrete and the grade of the steel beam on the behaviour of the system. The use of modified rigid plastic analysis is assessed, and a modification is suggested to predict the flexural strengths of the composite beams and slab system.

[1]  Scott Walbridge,et al.  Behaviour of steel–precast composite girders with through-bolt shear connectors under static loading , 2014 .

[2]  Jeeho Lee,et al.  Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures , 1998 .

[3]  E. Oñate,et al.  A plastic-damage model for concrete , 1989 .

[4]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Elementary Behaviour of Composite Steel and Concrete Structural Members , 2000 .

[5]  M. Bradford,et al.  Flexural behaviour of composite beams with high strength steel , 2013 .

[6]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Viability and performance of demountable composite connectors , 2014 .

[7]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Parametric Studies and Preliminary Design Recommendations on the Use of Postinstalled Shear Connectors for Strengthening Noncomposite Steel Bridges , 2012 .

[8]  Yuan Qing Wang,et al.  Research Progress on the Mechanical Property of High Strength Structural Steels , 2011 .

[9]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Experimental Behavior of Bridge Beams Retrofitted with Postinstalled Shear Connectors , 2011 .

[10]  Alessandro Zona,et al.  Probabilistic three-dimensional finite element study on composite beams with steel trapezoidal decking , 2013 .

[11]  Milan Veljkovic,et al.  Bolted shear connectors vs. headed studs behaviour in push-out tests , 2013 .

[12]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Numerical simulation of steel pretensioned bolted end-plate connections of different types and details , 2008 .

[13]  L. Dallam,et al.  High Strength Bolt Shear Connectors -Pushout Tests , 1968 .

[14]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Experimental study of composite beams having a precast geopolymer concrete slab and deconstructable bolted shear connectors , 2016 .

[15]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature , 2015 .

[16]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Behavior of High-Strength Friction-Grip Bolted Shear Connectors in Sustainable Composite Beams , 2015 .

[17]  Xianghe Dai,et al.  Effect of Concrete Strength and Stud Collar Size to Shear Capacity of Demountable Shear Connectors , 2015 .

[18]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Second Order Nonlinear Inelastic Analysis of Composite Steel-Concrete Members. II: Applications , 2006 .

[19]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Finite element modelling of steel-concrete composite beams with high-strength friction-grip bolt shear connectors , 2016 .

[20]  Priyan Mendis,et al.  Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs) , 2007 .

[21]  Hamid Valipour,et al.  Experimental study of sustainable high strength steel flush end plate beam-to-column composite joints with deconstructable bolted shear connectors , 2016 .

[22]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  The effects of partial shear connection in composite flush end plate joints Part II—Analytical study and design appraisal , 2006 .

[23]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Behavior of post-installed shear connectors under static and fatigue loading , 2010 .

[24]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Composite Steel and Concrete Structural Members: Fundamental Behaviour , 1995 .

[25]  M. Bradford,et al.  Strength Analysis of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams in Combined Bending and Shear , 2005 .

[26]  Jianqiao Ye,et al.  Effect of shear connector spacing and layout on the shear connector capacity in composite beams , 2011 .

[27]  B. V. Rangan,et al.  Engineering properties of geopolymer concrete , 2009 .

[28]  J. Davidovits Geopolymer chemistry and applications , 2008 .