Evaluation Roots: An International Perspective

Background: The second edition of Evaluation Roots has expanded to more global coverage, but no chapter emerged on development theory in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Purpose: The purpose of this article is initiate a conversation on filling this gap. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Not applicable. Data Collection and Analysis: Desk review. Findings: Two important distinctions emerged in evaluation roots in LMICs. The first is that much evaluation fits effectively on the Theory Tree as it is presented, with perhaps some nuance, but we see a collective rather than individual origin of the evaluation theory writings we have uncovered. The second is the nature of the formal evaluation work in LMICs; its practical origins are not yet formalized into full prescriptive theory.  The paper notes the prominence of external actors (such as the donor community) in formalizing evaluation practice, while at the same time observes important threads are developing in different regions of the world.  This paper proposes a way to thinking about evaluation in LMICs that is based on practice. The paper suggests a need for evaluation analysts, especially those in LMICs, to build a more comprehensive knowledge and documentation on development evaluation and, more broadly on building the field of evaluation in LMICs.  Keywords: development evaluation; Evaluation Roots; Evaluation Theory Tree; evaluation field building

[1]  Fabricio Pagani PEER REVIEW AS A TOOL FOR CO-OPERATION AND CHANGE , 2002 .

[2]  Ross Herbert,et al.  The African Peer Review Mechanism : lessons from the pioneers , 2009 .

[3]  Ravi Kanbur,et al.  THE AFRICAN PEER REVIEW MECHANISM (APRM): AN ASSESSMENT OF CONCEPT AND DESIGN , 2004 .

[4]  Pauline E. Ginsberg,et al.  Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice , 1993 .

[5]  R. Stake The Countenance of Educational Evaluation , 1967, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  The APRM Process in South Africa: An Overview By Khabele Matlosa* , 2007 .

[7]  Christina A. Christie,et al.  Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists′ Views and Influences , 2004 .

[8]  Ray C. Rist,et al.  The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations , 2009 .

[9]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use , 2010 .

[10]  James W. Westcott,et al.  The Practical Theorist The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin , 1970 .

[11]  D. Campbell Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Des Gasper,et al.  Evaluating the "logical framework approach": towards learning-oriented development evaluation , 2000 .

[13]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation , 1983 .

[14]  Jessica Dart,et al.  A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique: , 2003 .

[15]  Fred Carden,et al.  Outcome mapping : building learning and reflection into development programs [Arabic version] , 2002 .

[16]  David Snowden,et al.  The First Age: Information for Decision Support 1995: the Transition to the Second Age Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-awareness , 2022 .

[17]  D. Selener,et al.  A participatory systematization workbook: documenting, evaluating and learning from our development projects. , 1996 .

[18]  R. Chambers Revolutions in development inquiry , 2008 .

[19]  B. Chilisa,et al.  Indigenous Research Methodologies , 2011 .

[20]  M. Scriven The methodology of evaluation , 1966 .