Posture-related overdrainage: comparison of the performance of 10 hydrocephalus shunts in vitro.

OBJECTIVE Approximately 10 to 30% of shunt revisions may be attributed to posture-related overdrainage. The susceptibility of various hydrocephalus shunts to overdrainage of cerebrospinal fluid requires independent laboratory evaluation. METHODS Shunts were tested in vitro by using precise computer-controlled equipment that was able to evaluate pressure-flow performance curves under various conditions. Hydrodynamic resistance and opening, closing, and operational pressures were evaluated for at least 28 days with normal (atmospheric) and decreased (-23 mm Hg, based on the International Standard Organization/Draft International Standard 7197 standard, which simulates conditions in upright body positions) outlet pressures. RESULTS Ten different models of valves have been tested to date (Medtronic PS Medical Delta valve, flow-control valve, and lumboperitoneal shunt, Heyer-Schulte in-line, low-profile, and Pudenz flushing valves, Codman-Medos programmable and nonprogrammable valves, Sophy programmable valve, and Cordis Orbis-Sigma valve). The majority of these valves produced significantly negative (less than -10 mm Hg) average intracranial pressures in vertical body positions. In conjunction with nonphysiologically low hydrodynamic resistance (with the exception of the Orbis-Sigma valve, Medtronic PS Medical lumboperitoneal shunt, and Heyer-Schulte in-line valve), this may result in overdrainage related to body posture. The clinically reported rate of complications related to overdrainage is probably reduced by the long distal catheter, which increases the resistance of these valves by 100 to 200%. A few shunts (the Delta valve, low-profile valve, and Pudenz flushing valve with anti-siphon devices) offer reasonable resistance to negative outlet pressure, preventing complications related to overdrainage, but all valves with siphon-preventing devices may be blocked by increased subcutaneous pressure. CONCLUSION Shunts without mechanisms preventing very low intracranial pressure in vertical body positions should be identified and avoided for patients likely to develop complications related to cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage.

[1]  L. Olsen,et al.  COMPLICATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF HYDROCEPHALUS IN CHILDREN , 1983, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[2]  J. Wisoff,et al.  Chronic headache associated with a functioning shunt: usefulness of pressure monitoring. , 1991, Neurosurgery.

[3]  B Herzog,et al.  Experiences with the anti-siphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  P. Sørensen,et al.  Intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance in healthy subjects. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  S. Hakim,et al.  Hydraulic and Mechanical Mis‐matching of Valve Shunts Used in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus: the Need for a Servo‐valve Shunt , 1973, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[6]  M. Angell Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case , 1996 .

[7]  J. Yamashita,et al.  Risks in using siphon-reducing devices in adult patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus: bench test investigations with Delta valves. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  H. Rekate,et al.  Reexpansion of previously collapsed ventricles: the slit ventricle syndrome. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  E. Foltz,et al.  Symptomatic low intracranial pressure in shunted hydrocephalus. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  E. Cosman,et al.  The relationship between ventricular fluid pressure and body position in normal subjects and subjects with shunts: a telemetric study. , 1990, Neurosurgery.

[11]  J D Pickard,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts: United Kingdom Shunt Evaluation Laboratory. , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  M. D. Hooven,et al.  A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  J. Piatt,et al.  A search for determinants of cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival: retrospective analysis of a 14-year institutional experience. , 1993, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[14]  M. Hara,et al.  A new method for measuring cerebrospinal fluid flow in shunts. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  H. Portnoy,et al.  Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. , 1973, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  R. Weston,et al.  CHIMAERAS AND MOSAICS. , 1965, Lancet.

[17]  D. Horton,et al.  Fluid flow performance of a new siphon-control device for ventricular shunts. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  A. Marmarou,et al.  A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. , 1978, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  J D Pickard,et al.  Testing of cerebrospinal compensatory reserve in shunted and non-shunted patients: a guide to interpretation based on an observational study. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.