Environmental and economic sustainability of integrated production in bio-refineries: The thistle case in Sardinia

This paper aims at evaluating the environmental and economic sustainability of bio-refineries that produce multiple products through their supply chains (SCs). A physical enterprise input-output (EIO) model is used to quantify the material/energy/waste flows and integrated to the monetary EIO model to compute the economic performance of bio-refinery SC (BRSC). The empirical case study is based on a (under-construction) bio-refinery which uses thistle oil and residues to produce bio-monomers, bio-lubricants, glycerine, and thermal energy in Porto Torres industrial district, Sardinia (Italy). Given the impact of uncertainty on the performance of the BRSC, we apply sensitivity analysis on the spatial, logistical, and biomass quality variables, i.e., land productivity, transportation distance, and thistle oil content rate. In terms of practical contribution, the physical and monetary EIO models serve as planning and accounting tools for the involved companies of the BRSC. Findings show that the proposed models are effective in evaluating the sustainability of BRSCs and the investigated variables may significantly influence the economic viability of the bio-refinery. From managerial perspective, pricing contracts between the thistle producers and the bio-refinery is critically driven by the transportation distance. The bio-refinery can produce economically competitive outputs with an important contribution to the region's employment market.

[1]  C. Webb,et al.  Emerging biorefinery markets: global context and prospects for Latin America , 2008 .

[2]  H. Zijm,et al.  Design of sustainable second-generation biomass supply chains , 2016 .

[3]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Five years in the area of input-output and hybrid LCA , 2007 .

[4]  E. Jong,et al.  Product developments in the bio‐based chemicals arena , 2012 .

[5]  F. You,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis , 2012 .

[6]  Iddrisu Awudu,et al.  Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review , 2012 .

[7]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[8]  M. Mandl.  Status of green biorefining in Europe , 2010 .

[9]  Francis M. Epplin,et al.  A comparison of perennial polycultures and monocultures for producing biomass for biorefinery feedstock. , 2011 .

[10]  G. Marangoni,et al.  Input-Output for Management Control: The Case of GlaxoSmithKline , 2002 .

[11]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: a review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies. , 2015 .

[12]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  The effect of spatial variables on the economic and environmental performance of bioenergy production chains , 2011 .

[13]  Dirk Cattrysse,et al.  Methods to optimise the design and management of biomass-for-bioenergy supply chains: A review , 2014 .

[14]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[15]  E. Dietzenbacher,et al.  Analysing Materials and Energy Flows in an Industrial District using an Enterprise Input–Output Model , 2003 .

[16]  V. Tellarini,et al.  An input/output methodology to evaluate farms as sustainable agroecosystems: an application of indicators to farms in central Italy , 2000 .

[17]  Ricki G. Ingalls,et al.  Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future , 2013 .

[18]  Mohd Ambar Yarmo,et al.  A review on bio-oil production from biomass by using pyrolysis method , 2012 .

[19]  G. Richard,et al.  Paving the way for sustainable bioenergy in Europe: Technological options and research avenues for large-scale biomass feedstock supply , 2014 .

[20]  Mark A. Smith,et al.  Developing Canadian seed oils as industrial feedstocks , 2008 .

[21]  Vito Albino,et al.  Energy use in two Italian and Chinese tile manufacturers: A comparison using an enterprise input–output model , 2010 .

[22]  J. Minx,et al.  Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input-output analysis , 2006 .

[23]  Nathanael Greene,et al.  Comparative analysis of efficiency, environmental impact, and process economics for mature biomass refining scenarios , 2009 .

[24]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade , 2007 .

[25]  K. McCormick,et al.  Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches , 2013 .

[26]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass: opportunities, perspectives, and potential of biorefinery systems , 2011 .

[27]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Competing uses of biomass : Assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials , 2014 .

[28]  M. Panahi,et al.  The physicochemical properties and oil constituents of milk thistle (Silybum marianum Gaertn. cv. Budakalászi) under drought stress , 2011 .

[29]  J. V. Beilen.  Transgenic plant factories for the production of biopolymers and platform chemicals , 2008 .

[30]  A. Seco,et al.  Minimizing the environmental effects caused by the production of bioenergy , 2011 .

[31]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Industrial biotechnology for the production of bio-based chemicals--a cradle-to-grave perspective. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[32]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[33]  Birgit Kamm,et al.  Green biorefinery demonstration plant in Havelland (Germany) , 2010 .