A Lean way to teach Lean Product Development to Graduates

This paper describes the Lean Product Development (LPD) course taught in the Mechatronics Engineering Graduate Program from the Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica – ITA. During the course the sensei-lecturer discusses the theory, proposes frameworks, asks questions, and challenges the students. The course backbone is based on the Value Function Deployment (VFD) technique, which interlaces concepts from LPD, Integrated Product Development, Systems Engineering, and Project Management. The VFD is used in a course long practical exercise, stressing the concepts of “go and see”, Obeya, Set-Based Concurrent Engineering (SBCE), and pulled development. Finally, the students’ theoretical evaluation occurs by applying the “Design for Correction” tests, where multiple choice questions, while having a better alternative, might have more than one possible answer. The lecturer guides the correction process, when the students advocate their choice of alternatives. Therefore, the course promotes a lean way to teach LPD.

[1]  Pess TRAPPED ON THE WASTE NET: A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING AND PRIORITIZING THE CAUSES OF A CORPORATION’S LOW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE , 2014 .

[2]  Myles Walton Strategies for Lean Product Development , 1999 .

[3]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Integrated Product Development , 1987 .

[4]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[5]  Hugh McManus Product Development Value Stream Mapping (PDVSM) Manual Release 1.0 , 2005 .

[6]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method , 2001 .

[7]  Michael N. Kennedy Product Development for the Lean Enterprise: Why Toyota''''s System Is Four Times More Productive an , 2003 .

[8]  Eric Rebentisch,et al.  Understanding the Waste Net: A Method for Waste Elimination Prioritization in Product Development , 2009 .

[9]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process And Technology , 2006 .

[10]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[11]  Ken Lynch,et al.  Project Management Institute (PMI) , 2004 .

[12]  A. Tukker Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet , 2004 .

[13]  Geilson Loureiro A systems engineering and concurrent engineering framework for the integrated development of complex products , 1999 .

[14]  A. Trappey,et al.  Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology , 2009 .

[15]  Earll M. Murman,et al.  Lean Enterprise Value: Insights from MIT's Lean Aerospace Initiative , 2002 .

[16]  Guo Q. Huang,et al.  Design for X : concurrent engineering imperatives , 1996 .

[17]  Mike Rother,et al.  Toyota Kata: Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness and Superior Results , 2009 .

[18]  James P. Womack,et al.  Managing to Learn: Using the A3 Management Process to Solve Problems, Gain Agreement, Mentor and Lead , 2008 .

[19]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[20]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[21]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering design methods , 1989 .

[24]  Fernanda Francisco Pagani,et al.  GESTÃO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO DE PRODUTOS: ESTUDO DE CASO , 2007 .

[25]  C. Bauch Lean Product Development: Making Waste Transparent , 2004 .

[26]  William M. Riggs,et al.  Choice Over Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Technical Problem Solving , 2011 .

[27]  Michael T. Pich,et al.  Managing project uncertainty: from variation to chaos , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[28]  J. Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  Lean Thinking , 2019, Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management.

[29]  David E. Bell,et al.  Sequential Testing in Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .