The Distinctive Structure of Social Calls by Hanák's Dwarf Bat Pipistrellus hanaki

The analysis of social calls emitted by bats in the Pipistrellus genus has played an important role in assessing cryptic diversity and in investigating reproductive strategies and foraging ecology of these vespertilionids. Our study deals with social call structure of a recently discovered species, Pipistrellus hanaki. Because it shares a common ancestor with P. pygmaeus, we hypothesized that as in the other species from this group social call structure in P. hanaki retains the basic design observed in other bats from the same genus. We also hypothesized that as in other pipistrelles such calls fulfill context-dependent functions, being used by both foraging and mating bats for different purposes. However, we found that these calls have a structure rather different from that seen in most pipistrelles. Two different types of multi-harmonic, broad-band and long-duration social calls were identified, with distinctive temporal structures. Single component, frequency modulated-quasi constant frequency (FM-QCF) calls were emitted during summer at foraging sites where feeding buzzes were regularly produced. In autumn, when feeding buzz rates decreased and males caught at recording sites had prominent testes, a second type of single or multi-component calls with a fluctuating frequency over time was more frequent. Unlike the typical multi-component social calls recorded in several Pipistrellus species, our results suggest that social calls used by foraging or mating P. hanaki have markedly different structures. Because social calls of bats are speciesspecific and may function in reproductive isolation, we hypothesize that differentiation of social calls in P. hanaki has been associated with the divergence of this species from P. pygmaeus.

[1]  P. Racey,et al.  Feeding ecology of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during pregnancy and lactation. I. Foraging behaviour , 1985 .

[2]  I. Horáček,et al.  Mating System of a Migratory Bat, Nathusius' Pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii): Different Male Strategies* , 2011 .

[3]  Donald R. Griffin.  Bat sounds under natural conditions, with evidence for echolocation of insect prey , 1953 .

[4]  P. Hulva,et al.  Systematic Status of African Populations of Pipistrellus pipistrellus Complex (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), with a Description of a New Species from Cyrenaica, Libya , 2004 .

[5]  S. Harris,et al.  Identification of British bat species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters , 1997 .

[6]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Eri Honda-sumi.  Difference in calling song of three field crickets of the genus Teleogryllus: the role in premating isolation , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[9]  P. Racey.  Ageing and assessment of reproductive status of Pipistrelle bats, Pipistrellus pipistrellus. , 2009, Journal of zoology.

[10]  Michael D Greenfield.  Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Advertisement Signals , 1997 .

[11]  Lee A. Miller,et al.  The acoustic behavior of four species of vespertilionid bats studied in the field , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  E. Barratt,et al.  Vespertilio pipistrellus Schreber, 1774 and V. pygmaeus Leach, 1825 (currently Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus; Mammalia, Chiroptera): proposed designation of neotypes , 1999 .

[13]  T. Kunz,et al.  Acoustic divergence in two cryptic Hipposideros species: a role for social selection? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Gareth Jones.  Acoustic signals and speciation: the roles of natural and sexual selection in the evolution of cryptic species , 1997 .

[15]  D. Russo,et al.  BAT SPECIES RICHNESS AND ACTIVITY OVER AN ELEVATION GRADIENT IN MEDITERRANEAN SHRUBLANDS OF CRETE , 2010 .

[16]  Danilo Russo,et al.  Divergent echolocation call frequencies in insular rhinolophids (Chiroptera): a case of character displacement? , 2007 .

[17]  Danilo Russo,et al.  Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications , 2003 .

[18]  P. Hulva,et al.  New mitochondrial lineages within the Pipistrellus pipistrellus complex from Mediterranean Europe , 2007 .

[19]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Differences in songflight calls and social calls between two phonic types of the vespertilionid bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus , 1997 .

[21]  P. Racey,et al.  Species-specificity and individual variation in the song of male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii) , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Function of pipistrelle social calls: field data and a playback experiment , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  E. Zimmermann,et al.  Acoustic divergence in the communication of cryptic species of nocturnal primates (Microcebus ssp.) , 2008, BMC Biology.

[24]  O. Rackham,et al.  The making of the Cretan landscape , 1998 .

[25]  Rune Gerell,et al.  Territorial Advertisement and Mate Attraction in the Bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus , 2010 .

[26]  P. Marler,et al.  Animal Communication Signals , 1967, Science.

[27]  O. V. Helversen,et al.  Bat serenades—complex courtship songs of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  M. Brock Fenton,et al.  Echolocation: Implications for Ecology and Evolution of Bats , 1984, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  Danilo Russo,et al.  The social calls of Kuhl's pipistrelles Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl, 1819): structure and variation (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) , 1999 .

[30]  I. Horáček,et al.  The advertisement song of Pipistrellus nathusii (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae): a complex message containing acoustic signatures of individuals , 2008 .

[31]  J. Kusch,et al.  Structure and variability of bat social calls: implications for specificity and individual recognition , 2003 .

[32]  M. Fenton,et al.  Communication in the Chiroptera , 1985 .

[33]  G. Jones,et al.  The two cryptic species of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera : Vespertilionidae) occur in Italy : evidence from echolocation and social calls , 2000 .

[34]  M. Brock Fenton,et al.  A technique for monitoring bat activity with results obtained from different environments in southern Ontario , 1970 .

[35]  G. Neuweiler.  Foraging, echolocation and audition in bats , 1984, Naturwissenschaften.

[36]  Eleni Papadatou,et al.  Identification of bat species in Greece from their echolocation calls , 2008 .

[37]  P. Racey.  Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats , 2011 .

[38]  K. Barlow,et al.  PipistreZZus nathusii (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Britain in the mating season , 1996 .

[39]  R. Wayne,et al.  DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species , 1997, Nature.

[40]  M. Fenton.  Eavesdropping on the echolocation and social calls of bats , 2003 .

[41]  G. Höbel,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN THE ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM OF GREEN TREE FROGS (HYLA CINEREA) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  Laura A. Higgins,et al.  Sexual selection and variation: a multivariate approach to species-specific calls and preferences , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  D. Russo,et al.  Social calls are subject to stabilizing selection in insular bats , 2009 .

[44]  S. V. Van Parijs,et al.  Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present? , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Identification of twenty‐two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time‐expanded recordings of echolocation calls , 2002 .