Gait and turning characteristics from daily life increase ability to predict future falls in people with Parkinson's disease

Objectives To investigate if digital measures of gait (walking and turning) collected passively over a week of daily activities in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) increases the discriminative ability to predict future falls compared to fall history alone. Methods We recruited 34 individuals with PD (17 with history of falls and 17 non-fallers), age: 68 ± 6 years, MDS-UPDRS III ON: 31 ± 9. Participants were classified as fallers (at least one fall) or non-fallers based on self-reported falls in past 6 months. Eighty digital measures of gait were derived from 3 inertial sensors (Opal® V2 System) placed on the feet and lower back for a week of passive gait monitoring. Logistic regression employing a “best subsets selection strategy” was used to find combinations of measures that discriminated future fallers from non-fallers, and the Area Under Curve (AUC). Participants were followed via email every 2 weeks over the year after the study for self-reported falls. Results Twenty-five subjects reported falls in the follow-up year. Quantity of gait and turning measures (e.g., number of gait bouts and turns per hour) were similar in future fallers and non-fallers. The AUC to discriminate future fallers from non-fallers using fall history alone was 0.77 (95% CI: [0.50–1.00]). In contrast, the highest AUC for gait and turning digital measures with 4 combinations was 0.94 [0.84–1.00]. From the top 10 models (all AUCs>0.90) via the best subsets strategy, the most consistently selected measures were variability of toe-out angle of the foot (9 out of 10), pitch angle of the foot during mid-swing (8 out of 10), and peak turn velocity (7 out of 10). Conclusions These findings highlight the importance of considering precise digital measures, captured via sensors strategically placed on the feet and low back, to quantify several different aspects of gait (walking and turning) during daily life to improve the classification of future fallers in PD.

[1]  Vrutangkumar V. Shah,et al.  Effect of Levodopa and Environmental Setting on Gait and Turning Digital Markers Related to Falls in People with Parkinson's Disease , 2022, Movement disorders clinical practice.

[2]  Vrutangkumar V. Shah,et al.  Fall Prediction Based on Instrumented Measures of Gait and Turning in Daily Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis , 2022, Sensors.

[3]  L. Rochester,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Environment and Data Aggregation by Walking Bout Duration on Parkinson’s Disease Classification Using Machine Learning , 2022, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

[4]  K. Aminian,et al.  Comparison of Laboratory and Daily-Life Gait Speed Assessment during ON and OFF States in Parkinson’s Disease , 2021, Sensors.

[5]  L. Defebvre,et al.  Do kinematic gait parameters help to discriminate between fallers and non-fallers with Parkinson’s disease? , 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Vrutangkumar V. Shah,et al.  Laboratory versus daily life gait characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and matched controls , 2020, Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation.

[7]  Yu Guan,et al.  Gait Analysis with Wearables Can Accurately Classify Fallers from Non-Fallers: A Step toward Better Management of Neurological Disorders , 2020, Sensors.

[8]  James Mcnames,et al.  Inertial Sensor Algorithms to Characterize Turning in Neurological Patients With Turn Hesitations , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  James McNames,et al.  Effect of Bout Length on Gait Measures in People with and without Parkinson’s Disease during Daily Life , 2020, Sensors.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Long-term unsupervised mobility assessment in movement disorders , 2020, The Lancet Neurology.

[11]  Mahmoud El-Gohary,et al.  Quantity and quality of gait and turning in people with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and matched controls during daily living , 2020, Journal of Neurology.

[12]  Mark Latt,et al.  Falls in Parkinson’s Disease Subtypes: Risk Factors, Locations and Circumstances , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Is every-day walking in older adults more analogous to dual-task walking or to usual walking? Elucidating the gaps between gait performance in the lab and during 24/7 monitoring , 2019, European Review of Aging and Physical Activity.

[14]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Associations between daily-living physical activity and laboratory-based assessments of motor severity in patients with falls and Parkinson's disease. , 2019, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[15]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Analysis of Free-Living Gait in Older Adults With and Without Parkinson’s Disease and With and Without a History of Falls: Identifying Generic and Disease-Specific Characteristics , 2019, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[16]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Model-based and Model-free Machine Learning Techniques for Diagnostic Prediction and Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Walter Maetzler,et al.  Effect of Fear of Falling on Turning Performance in Parkinson’s Disease in the Lab and at Home , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[18]  Julia M. Leach,et al.  Natural turn measures predict recurrent falls in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal cohort study , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Turn Around Freezing: Community-Living Turning Behavior in People with Parkinson’s Disease , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[20]  Patricia Cortijo,et al.  Predictive model for falling in Parkinson disease patients , 2016, eNeurologicalSci.

[21]  B. Galna,et al.  Free-living gait characteristics in ageing and Parkinson’s disease: impact of environment and ambulatory bout length , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  B. Galna,et al.  Free-living gait characteristics in ageing and Parkinson’s disease: impact of environment and ambulatory bout length , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  F. Horak,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Turning Mobility and Its Association to Falls and Cognitive Function: A Pilot Study. , 2016, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[24]  Robert Jech,et al.  Predicting Falls in Parkinson Disease: What Is the Value of Instrumented Testing in OFF Medication State? , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Ambulatory fall-risk assessment: amount and quality of daily-life gait predict falls in older adults. , 2015, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[26]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Do Extreme Values of Daily-Life Gait Characteristics Provide More Information About Fall Risk Than Median Values? , 2015, JMIR research protocols.

[27]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Objective Assessment of Fall Risk in Parkinson's Disease Using a Body-Fixed Sensor Worn for 3 Days , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  Sean Pearson,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Turning in Patients with Movement Disability , 2013, Sensors.

[29]  Martina Mancini,et al.  Objective biomarkers of balance and gait for Parkinson's disease using body‐worn sensors , 2013, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[30]  Natalie E. Allen,et al.  Recurrent Falls in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review , 2013, Parkinson's disease.

[31]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[32]  V. Srikanth,et al.  Gait, gait variability and the risk of multiple incident falls in older people: a population-based study. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[33]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[34]  Talia Herman,et al.  Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: agreement between patients with Parkinson's disease and their carers. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[35]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: common and distinct behavior among stride length, gait variability, and fractal-like scaling. , 2009, Chaos.

[36]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[37]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[38]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[39]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[40]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[41]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[42]  S. Leeder,et al.  A population based study , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[43]  Mahmoud El-Gohary,et al.  Continuous monitoring of turning in Parkinson's disease: Rehabilitation potential. , 2015, NeuroRehabilitation.

[44]  J. Fisher Objective assessment of upper limb motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease using body-worn sensors , 2014 .

[45]  James McNames,et al.  Mobility Lab to Assess Balance and Gait with Synchronized Body-worn Sensors. , 2011, Journal of bioengineering & biomedical science.

[46]  R. Fry,et al.  COVID-19 Infection Risk amongst 14,104 Vaccinated Care Home Residents: A national observational longitudinal cohort study in Wales, United Kingdom, December 2020 to March 2021 , 2021, medRxiv.