A novel reactor type for autothermal reforming of diesel fuel and kerosene

This paper describes the development and experimental evaluation of Juelich’s novel reactor type ATR AH2 for autothermal reforming of diesel fuel and kerosene. ATR AH2 overcomes the disadvantages of Juelich’s former reactor generations from the perspective of the fuel cell system by constructively integrating an additional pressure swirl nozzle for the injection of cold water and a steam generation chamber. As a consequence, ATR AH2 eliminates the need for external process configurations for steam supply. Additionally, the internal steam generator has been modified by increasing its cross-sectional area and by decreasing its length. This measure reduces the pressure drop of the steam generator from approx. 500mbar to roughly a thirtieth. The experimental evaluation of ATR AH2 at steady state revealed that the novel concept for heat management applied in ATR AH2 is suitable for fuel cell systems at any reformer load point between 20% and 120% when the mass fractions of cold water to the newly integrated nozzle are set to values between 40% and 50%. The experimental evaluation of ATR AH2 during start-up and shut-down showed that slight modifications of the reaction conditions during these transient phases greatly reduced the concentrations of ethene, ethane, propene and benzene in the reformate. From the fuel cell system perspective, these improvements provide a very beneficial contribution to longer stabilities for the catalysts and adsorption materials.

[1]  J. Schwank,et al.  Effect of metal particle size on sulfur tolerance of Ni catalysts during autothermal reforming of isooctane , 2011 .

[2]  R. Farrauto,et al.  Steam reforming of sulfur-containing dodecane on a Rh-Pt catalyst: Influence of process parameters on catalyst stability and coke structure , 2014 .

[3]  M. Walluk,et al.  Bio-fuel reformation for solid oxide fuel cell applications. Part 3: Biodiesel–diesel blends , 2014 .

[4]  Thomas Aicher,et al.  Fuel processors for fuel cell APU applications , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas Aicher,et al.  Catalytic autothermal reforming of Jet fuel , 2005 .

[6]  Giancarlo Baldi,et al.  Effects of tar model compounds on commercial water gas shift catalysts , 2012 .

[7]  Antje Wörner,et al.  Direct steam reforming of diesel and diesel–biodiesel blends for distributed hydrogen generation , 2015 .

[8]  Marius Maximini,et al.  Coupled operation of a diesel steam reformer and an LT- and HT-PEFC , 2014 .

[9]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Autothermal reforming of Fischer–Tropsch diesel over alumina and ceria–zirconia supported catalysts , 2013 .

[10]  John P. Baltrus,et al.  Characterization of coke deposited on Pt/alumina catalyst during reforming of liquid hydrocarbons , 2005 .

[11]  Philip Engelhardt,et al.  Integrated fuel cell APU based on a compact steam reformer for diesel and a PEMFC , 2012 .

[12]  Werner Lehnert,et al.  HT-PEFC Systems Operating with Diesel and Kerosene for APU Application , 2012 .

[13]  P. Ekdunge,et al.  Diesel fuel reformer for automotive fuel cell applications , 2009 .

[14]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  Autothermal reforming of commercial Jet A-1 on a 5kWe scale , 2007 .

[15]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  Effects of ethylene on carbon formation in diesel autothermal reforming , 2008 .

[16]  Sangho Yoon,et al.  Suppression of ethylene-induced carbon deposition in diesel autothermal reforming , 2009 .

[17]  M. Harada,et al.  Hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of kerosene over MgAlOx-supported Rh catalysts , 2009 .

[18]  Klas Engvall,et al.  Promoted RhPt bimetallic catalyst supported on δ-Al2O3 and CeO2–ZrO2 during full-scale autothermal reforming for automotive applications: Post-mortem characterization , 2015 .

[19]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Autothermal reforming of low-sulfur diesel over bimetallic RhPt supported on Al2O3, CeO2–ZrO2, SiO2 and TiO2 , 2011 .

[20]  A. Outi I. Krause,et al.  Autothermal reforming of simulated and commercial diesel: The performance of zirconia-supported RhPt catalyst in the presence of sulfur , 2008 .

[21]  D. L. Daggett,et al.  Fuel cell APU for commercial aircraft , 2003 .

[22]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Evaluation of Co, La, and Mn promoted Rh catalysts for autothermal reforming of commercial diesel , 2014 .

[23]  L. Hong,et al.  Ni/Ce1−xMx catalyst generated from metallo-organic network for autothermal reforming of diesel surrogate , 2013 .

[24]  Peiwen Li,et al.  Small-scale reforming of diesel and jet fuels to make hydrogen and syngas for fuel cells: A review , 2013 .

[25]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Long-term stability at fuel processing of diesel and kerosene , 2014 .

[26]  J. Bae,et al.  Autothermal reforming study of diesel for fuel cell application , 2006 .

[27]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Fuel Processing of Low-Sulfur Diesel for Fuel Cell Systems , 2015 .

[28]  Gunther Kolb,et al.  Development and evaluation of a microreactor for the reforming of diesel fuel in the kW range , 2009 .

[29]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Optimised Mixture Formation for Diesel Fuel Processing , 2008 .

[30]  D. Creaser,et al.  Hydrogen generation from n-tetradecane, low-sulfur and Fischer-Tropsch diesel over Rh supported on alumina doped with ceria/lanthana , 2011 .

[31]  Joongmyeon Bae,et al.  Performance comparison of autothermal reforming for liquid hydrocarbons, gasoline and diesel for fuel cell applications , 2006 .

[32]  Semant Jain,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of fuel cell auxiliary power units as alternative to idling , 2006 .

[33]  R. C. Samsun,et al.  Fuel Processing of Diesel and Kerosene for Auxiliary Power Unit Applications , 2013 .

[34]  Werner Lehnert,et al.  Design and test of a 5kWe high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell system operated with diesel and kerosene , 2014 .

[35]  S. Specchia Fuel processing activities at European level: A panoramic overview , 2014 .

[36]  Theodore R. Krause,et al.  Effect of temperature, steam-to-carbon ratio, and alkali metal additives on improving the sulfur tolerance of a Rh/La–Al2O3 catalyst reforming gasoline for fuel cell applications , 2008 .