A Review of Key Features and Their Implementation in Unstructured, Structured, and Agent‐Based Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment

Population models can provide valuable tools for Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA). A growing amount of work on model development and documentation is now available to guide modelers and risk assessors to address different ERA questions. However, there remain misconceptions about population models for ERA, and communication between regulators and modelers can still be hindered by a lack of clarity in the underlying formalism, implementation, and complexity of different model types. In particular, there is confusion about differences among types of models and the implications of including or ignoring interactions of organisms with each other and their environment. In this review, we provide an overview of the key features represented in population models of relevance for ERA, which include density dependence, spatial heterogeneity, external drivers, stochasticity, life-history traits, behavior, energetics, and how exposure and effects are integrated in the models. We differentiate three broadly defined population model types (unstructured, structured, and agent-based) and explain how they can represent these key features. Depending on the ERA context, some model features will be more important than others, and this can inform model-type choice, how features are implemented, and, possibly the collection of additional data. We show that nearly all features can be included irrespective of formalization, but some features are more or less easily incorporated in certain model types. We also analyze how the key features have been used in published population models implemented as unstructured, structured, and agent-based models. The overall aim of this review is to increase confidence and understanding by model users and evaluators when considering the potential and adequacy of population models for use in ERA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Uta Berger,et al.  Making Predictions in a Changing World: The Benefits of Individual-Based Ecology , 2014, Bioscience.

[2]  P. J. Kennedy,et al.  BEEHAVE: a systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure , 2014, The Journal of applied ecology.

[3]  Heath W Garris,et al.  Modeling the interaction between the exotic invasive aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum and the native biocontrol agent Euhrychiopsis lecontei to improve augmented management programs , 2011, BioControl.

[4]  R. Stillman,et al.  Individual‐based ecology of coastal birds , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  Andreas Focks,et al.  Towards better modelling and decision support: Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE , 2014 .

[6]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  How to Evaluate the Quality of Toxicokinetic—Toxicodynamic Models in the Context of Environmental Risk Assessment , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[7]  Brian A. Maurer,et al.  Effects of chronic pesticide stress on wildlife populations in complex landscapes: Processes at multiple scales , 1996 .

[8]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Fish Cohort Dynamics: Application of Complementary Modeling Approaches , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  InSTREAM: the individual-based stream trout research and environmental assessment model , 2009 .

[10]  R M Sibly,et al.  Risk Assessment of UK Skylark Populations Using Life-History and Individual-Based Landscape Models , 2005, Ecotoxicology.

[11]  Martin Hermy,et al.  Metapopulation viability of an endangered holoparasitic plant in a dynamic landscape , 2009 .

[12]  N. Slade,et al.  Detection, survival rates and dynamics of a cryptic plant, Asclepias meadii: applications of mark‐recapture models to long‐term monitoring studies , 2009 .

[13]  Andreas Focks,et al.  A simulation study on effects of exposure to a combination of pesticides used in an orchard and tuber crop on the recovery time of a vulnerable aquatic invertebrate , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  Xiaowei Zhang,et al.  A qPCR method to quantify bioavailable phosphorus using indigenous aquatic species , 2018, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[15]  S. Bartell,et al.  Species-specific population dynamics and their link to an aquatic food web: A hybrid modeling approach , 2019, Ecological Modelling.

[16]  Steven F Railsback,et al.  Pattern-oriented modelling: a ‘multi-scope’ for predictive systems ecology , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  R. Stewart,et al.  Use of habitat-contamination spatial correlation to determine when to perform a spatially explicit ecological risk assessment , 2007 .

[18]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Annual plants under cyclic disturbance regime: better understanding through model aggregation. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  S. Higgins,et al.  Coupling a physiological grazer population model with a generalized model for vegetation dynamics. , 2013 .

[20]  E. Levin,et al.  The toxicology of climate change: environmental contaminants in a warming world. , 2009, Environment international.

[21]  V E Forbes,et al.  Population-level impacts of pesticide-induced chronic effects on individuals depend more on ecology than toxicology. , 2009, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[22]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Frithjof Lutscher,et al.  Spatially-explicit matrix models , 2004 .

[24]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  ABMland - a Tool for Agent-Based Model Development on Urban Land Use Change , 2012, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[25]  Elke I. Zimmer,et al.  Simplified dynamic energy budget model for analysing ecotoxicity data. , 2012 .

[26]  V. Forbes,et al.  Population context matters: Predicting the effects of metabolic stress mediated by food availability and predation with an agent- and energy budget-based model , 2020 .

[27]  David H. Wahl,et al.  Bioenergetics Modeling in the 21st Century : Reviewing New Insights and Revisiting Old Constraints , 2008 .

[28]  Virginie Ducrot,et al.  Dynamic energy budget as a basis to model population‐level effects of zinc‐spiked sediments in the gastropod Valvata piscinalis , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[29]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[30]  R. Sibly,et al.  Are current species extrapolation models a good basis for ecological risk assessment? , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[31]  Peter Chapman,et al.  Ecological models and pesticide risk assessment: Current modeling practice , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[32]  W. Clements,et al.  Estimating physiological cost of chemical exposure: integrating energetics and stress to quantify toxic effects in fish , 1999 .

[33]  J. Carlson,et al.  Recovery potential of smalltooth sawfish, Pristis pectinata, in the United States determined using population viability models , 2015 .

[34]  F. Weckerly MATRIX POPULATION MODELS: CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION , 2008 .

[35]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[36]  Uta Berger,et al.  Robustness analysis: Deconstructing computational models for ecological theory and applications , 2016 .

[37]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach , 2014 .

[38]  A. Gerhardt,et al.  Aquatic Behavioral Ecotoxicology—Prospects and Limitations , 2007 .

[39]  Bing Liu,et al.  The dynamical behaviors of a Lotka–Volterra predator–prey model concerning integrated pest management ☆ , 2005 .

[40]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[41]  Lawrence W Barnthouse,et al.  Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[42]  R. Sibly,et al.  Effects of noise and by-catch on a Danish harbour porpoise population , 2014 .

[43]  R. Nisbet,et al.  Extrapolating ecotoxicological effects from individuals to populations: a generic approach based on Dynamic Energy Budget theory and individual-based modeling , 2013, Ecotoxicology.

[44]  P. J. Van den Brink,et al.  Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[45]  T. Wiegand,et al.  The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red‐cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[46]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .

[47]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Wildlife-vehicle collision mitigation: Is partial fencing the answer? An agent-based model approach , 2013 .

[48]  V. Grimm,et al.  A plea for consistency, transparency, and reproducibility in risk assessment effect models , 2018, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[49]  R. Sibly,et al.  Representing the acquisition and use of energy by individuals in agent‐based models of animal populations , 2013 .

[50]  Thomas G Preuss,et al.  Limitations of extrapolating toxic effects on reproduction to the population level. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[51]  Peter Calow,et al.  The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[52]  R. Sibly,et al.  Density-dependent effects of a toxicant on life-history traits and population dynamics of a capitellid polychaete , 1999 .

[53]  W. Ricker Stock and Recruitment , 1954 .

[54]  C. Pfister,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VARIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR MATRIX MODEL PREDICTIONS , 2003 .

[55]  Walter Schmitt,et al.  Toxicokinetic‐toxicodynamic modeling of quantal and graded sublethal endpoints: A brief discussion of concepts , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[56]  V. Forbes,et al.  Similar individual-level responses to stressors have different population-level consequences among closely related species of trout. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[57]  V. Grimm Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[58]  D. Doak,et al.  Book Review: Quantitative Conservation biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability analysis , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[59]  Wayne G. Landis,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: Indirect effects and multiple distinct outcomes in ecological risk assessment , 1998 .

[60]  Roger Vargas,et al.  How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  "It was an artefact not the result": A note on systems dynamic model development tools , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[62]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[63]  O. Berglund,et al.  Ecological implications of altered fish foraging after exposure to an antidepressant pharmaceutical. , 2014, Aquatic toxicology.

[64]  Volker Grimm,et al.  How to use mechanistic effect models in environmental risk assessment of pesticides: Case studies and recommendations from the SETAC workshop MODELINK , 2016, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[65]  Shaye E. Sable,et al.  A comparison of individual-based and matrix projection models for simulating yellow perch population dynamics in Oneida Lake, New York, USA , 2008 .

[66]  H. R. Prendeville,et al.  Response of population size to changing vital rates in random environments , 2013, Theoretical Ecology.

[67]  R. Nisbet,et al.  Integrating dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory with traditional bioenergetic models , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[68]  B. Preston,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of sublethal toxicant exposure on population dynamics of freshwater rotifers: a modeling approach. , 2001, Aquatic toxicology.

[69]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Integrating dynamic energy budgets into matrix population models , 2006 .

[70]  H. T. Banks,et al.  Dynamic models for insect mortality due to exposure to insecticides , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..

[71]  Martin Lange,et al.  Agricultural landscape generators for simulation models: A review of existing solutions and an outline of future directions , 2019, Ecological Modelling.

[72]  W. Schmitt,et al.  Mechanistic TK/TD-model simulating the effect of growth inhibitors on Lemna populations , 2013 .

[73]  John M. Emlen,et al.  Terrestrial population models for ecological risk assessment: A state‐of‐the‐art review , 1989 .

[74]  John D Stark,et al.  An approach for developing simple generic models for ecological risk assessments of fish populations , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[75]  Grenfell,et al.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  R. Dietz,et al.  Allee effect in polar bears: a potential consequence of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[77]  Pamela Rueda-Cediel,et al.  Developing population models: A systematic approach for pesticide risk assessment using herbaceous plants as an example. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[78]  Alan R. Johnson Landscape Ecotoxicology and Assessment of Risk at Multiple Scales , 2002 .

[79]  Paul J van den Brink,et al.  Simulating population recovery of an aquatic isopod: Effects of timing of stress and landscape structure. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[80]  H. Jager,et al.  A Population Model to Assess Influences on the Viability of the Shortnose Sturgeon Population in the Ogeechee River, Georgia , 2013 .

[81]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[82]  Nathan Pollesch,et al.  A framework for linking population model development with ecological risk assessment objectives , 2018, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[83]  S. Raimondo Density dependent functional forms drive compensation in populations exposed to stressors , 2013 .

[84]  Pernille Thorbek,et al.  Linking pesticide exposure and spatial dynamics: An individual-based model of wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) populations in agricultural landscapes , 2013 .

[85]  Steve Norman,et al.  Comparing population recovery after insecticide exposure for four aquatic invertebrate species using models of different complexity , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[86]  David H. Miller,et al.  Density dependent matrix model for gray wolf population projection , 2002 .

[87]  Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan,et al.  Modelling the Dynamics of Feral Alfalfa Populations and Its Management Implications , 2012, PloS one.

[88]  P. Thorbek,et al.  Assessing the risks of pesticides to threatened and endangered species using population modeling: A critical review and recommendations for future work , 2016, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[89]  Tjalling Jager,et al.  Physiological modes of action of toxic chemicals in the nematode Acrobeloides nanus , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[90]  J. Stark,et al.  The Use of Surrogate Species in Risk Assessment: Using Life History Data to Safeguard Against False Negatives , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[91]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Adding Value to Ecological Risk Assessment with Population Modeling , 2011 .

[92]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments , 2010 .

[93]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Two pairs of eyes are better than one: Combining individual-based and matrix models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals , 2014 .

[94]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  TOXICANT IMPACTS ON DENSITY‐LIMITED POPULATIONS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THEORY, PRACTICE, AND RESULTS , 2001 .

[95]  S. Railsback,et al.  Predicting impacts of chemicals from organisms to ecosystem service delivery: A case study of endocrine disruptor effects on trout. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[96]  N. Goel 9 – Chemical Kinetics , 1974 .

[97]  D. Mladenoff,et al.  Simulation of forest change in the New Jersey Pine Barrens under current and pre-colonial conditions , 2008 .

[98]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  The ODD Protocol for Describing Agent-Based and Other Simulation Models: A Second Update to Improve Clarity, Replication, and Structural Realism , 2020, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[99]  T. Strauss,et al.  The secret lives of cannibals: Modelling density-dependent processes that regulate population dynamics in Chaoborus crystallinus , 2016 .

[100]  R. Brain,et al.  Population modeling for pesticide risk assessment of threatened species—A case study of a terrestrial plant, Boltonia decurrens , 2017, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[101]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population dynamics in variable environments I. Long-run growth rates and extinction , 1980 .

[102]  K. Szoszkiewicz,et al.  Behavioural Responses of Unio tumidus Freshwater Mussels to Pesticide Contamination , 2019, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

[103]  S. Ferson,et al.  Realism and Relevance of Ecological Models Used in Chemical Risk Assessment , 2003 .

[104]  C. Tyler,et al.  Assessing population impacts of toxicant-induced disruption of breeding behaviours using an individual-based model for the three-spined stickleback , 2018, Ecological Modelling.

[105]  V. Grimm,et al.  Chemical and natural stressors combined: from cryptic effects to population extinction , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[106]  R. Didham,et al.  Applications and implications of ecological energetics. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[107]  Andreas Focks,et al.  Integrating chemical fate and population-level effect models for pesticides at landscape scale: New options for risk assessment , 2014 .

[108]  P Flammarion,et al.  Do migratory or demographic disruptions rule the population impact of pollution in spatial networks? , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[109]  F. Jeltsch,et al.  Simulation of herbicide impacts on a plant community: comparing model predictions of the plant community model IBC-grass to empirical data , 2018, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[110]  C. Hunter,et al.  The use of the vec-permutation matrix in spatial matrix population models , 2005 .

[111]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.