Top Persuader Prediction for Social Networks

Top persuaders in a social network are social entities whose adoption of a product or service will result in the largest numbers of other entities in the network to adopt the same product or service. Predicting top persuaders is critical to an expanding array of important social network-centric applications, such as viral marketing, customer retention, and political message promotion. This study formulates the top persuader prediction problem and develops a novel method to predict top persuaders. Our method development is rooted in eminent social network theories that reveal several forces central to social persuasion, including social influence, entity similarity, and structural equivalence. Our method innovatively integrates these forces to predict top persuaders in a social network, in contrast to existing methods that primarily focus on social influence. Specifically, we introduce persuasion probability that denotes the likelihood of persuasion conditioned on these forces. We then propose how to estimate persuasion probabilities, develop an algorithm to predict top persuaders using the estimated persuasion probabilities, and analyze the theoretical property of the algorithm. We conduct an extensive evaluation with real-world social network data and show that our method substantially outperforms prevalent methods from representative previous research and salient industry practices.

[1]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Delinquent Networks , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Peter Moran,et al.  Contingent Organization as a Network Theory: The Culture- Performance Contingency Function , 1994 .

[3]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[4]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[5]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1981 .

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[7]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  Topological centrality and its e-Science applications , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Predicting Influential Users in Online Social Networks , 2010, ArXiv.

[9]  Johannes Fürnkranz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Probability Estimation Techniques for Probabilistic Rules , 2009, Discovery Science.

[10]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[11]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Reducing Misclassification Costs , 1994, ICML.

[12]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  D. Watts,et al.  Viral marketing for the real world , 2007 .

[14]  James Cussens Bayes and Pseudo-Bayes Estimates of Conditional Probabilities and Their Reliability , 1993, ECML.

[15]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Persuasion in negotiations and conflict situations. , 2000 .

[16]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[18]  Carl D. Meyer,et al.  Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra , 2000 .

[19]  Alex Bavelas A Mathematical Model for Group Structures , 1948 .

[20]  D. Knoke Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction , 1990 .

[21]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[23]  B. Weiner Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory , 1974 .

[24]  Daniel J. Brass Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[25]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[26]  Yong Tan,et al.  Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[28]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[29]  Kathryn Fraughnaugh,et al.  Introduction to graph theory , 1973, Mathematical Gazette.

[30]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[31]  Florian Probst,et al.  Who will lead and who will follow: Identifying Influential Users in Online Social Networks , 2013, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[32]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  Influence and passivity in social media , 2010, ECML/PKDD.

[33]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[34]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[36]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[37]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[38]  Bianca Zadrozny,et al.  Learning and making decisions when costs and probabilities are both unknown , 2001, KDD '01.

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Betweenness centrality measures for directed graphs , 1994 .

[41]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Identifying the influential bloggers in a community , 2008, WSDM '08.

[42]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178 , 2022 .

[43]  D. R. Shier,et al.  Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Finite Markov Chains , 2003 .

[44]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[45]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[46]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Predicting Adoption Probabilities in Social Networks , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[48]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[50]  E. Berscheid Social Psychology. 4th ed. , 1981 .

[51]  Barbara Wejnert Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[52]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[53]  Pawan Kumar,et al.  Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hyper Textual Web Search Engine , 2009 .

[54]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[55]  W. Bainbridge The Scientific Research Potential of Virtual Worlds , 2007, Science.

[56]  Donghee Yvette Wohn,et al.  Spending real money: purchasing patterns of virtual goods in an online social game , 2014, CHI.

[57]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Alison Watts,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Network Formation , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[59]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[60]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Structural Theory of Social Influence: List of Tables and Figures , 1998 .

[61]  Eric V. Denardo,et al.  Periods of Connected Networks and Powers of Nonnegative Matrices , 1977, Math. Oper. Res..

[62]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[63]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Research Note - Social Interactions and the "Digital Divide": Explaining Variations in Internet Use , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Effect of Uncertainty on the Use of Social Influence in Organizational Decision Making. , 1976 .

[65]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[66]  John Yen,et al.  Finding influential users of online health communities: a new metric based on sentiment influence. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[67]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[68]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[69]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[70]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[71]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[72]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies , 2010, Sociological methods & research.

[73]  W. Wood Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[74]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[75]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Introduction to Information , 1993 .

[76]  M. Prokopenko,et al.  Percolation Centrality: Quantifying Graph-Theoretic Impact of Nodes during Percolation in Networks , 2013, PloS one.