Optimization of fluoroscopy parameters using pattern matching prediction in the real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system.

In the real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system, fluoroscopy is used to determine the real-time position of internal fiducial markers. The pattern recognition score (PRS) ranging from 0 to 100 is computed by a template pattern matching technique in order to determine the marker position on the fluoroscopic image. The PRS depends on the quality of the fluoroscopic image. However, the fluoroscopy parameters such as tube voltage, current and exposure duration are selected manually and empirically in the clinical situation. This may result in an unnecessary imaging dose from the fluoroscopy or loss of the marker because of too much or insufficient x-ray exposure. In this study, a novel optimization method is proposed in order to minimize the fluoroscopic dose while keeping the image quality usable for marker tracking. The PRS can be predicted in a region where the marker appears to move in the fluoroscopic image by the proposed method. The predicted PRS can be utilized to judge whether the marker can be tracked with accuracy. In this paper, experiments were performed to show the feasibility of the PRS prediction method under various conditions. The predicted PRS showed good agreement with the measured PRS. The root mean square error between the predicted PRS and the measured PRS was within 1.44. An experiment using a motion controller and an anthropomorphic chest phantom was also performed in order to imitate a clinical fluoroscopy situation. The result shows that the proposed prediction method is expected to be applicable in a real clinical situation.

[1]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy for adrenal tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  C J Martin,et al.  Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  H Bosmans,et al.  Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  John Damilakis,et al.  Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Prediction of respiratory tumour motion for real-time image-guided radiotherapy. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[8]  Geneviève Gaboriaud,et al.  Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Real-time tumour-tracking radiotherapy , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  D Ruan,et al.  Real-time prediction of respiratory motion based on local regression methods , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  A. Elster,et al.  Patient Dose Reference Levels for Interventional Radiology: A National Approach , 2010 .

[12]  E Vano,et al.  Influence of patient thickness and operation modes on occupational and patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology. , 2006, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Gating based on internal/external signals with dynamic correlation updates , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  C S Moore,et al.  Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.