Localization of molecular orbitals: from fragments to molecule.

Conspectus Localized molecular orbitals (LMO) not only serve as an important bridge between chemical intuition and molecular wave functions but also can be employed to reduce the computational cost of many-body methods for electron correlation and excitation. Therefore, how to localize the usually completely delocalized canonical molecular orbitals (CMO) into confined physical spaces has long been an important topic: It has a long history but still remains active to date. While the known LMOs can be classified into (exact) orthonormal and nonorthogonal, as well as (approximate) absolutely localized MOs, the ways for achieving these can be classified into two categories, a posteriori top-down and a priori bottom-up, depending on whether they invoke the global CMOs (or equivalently the molecular density matrix). While the top-down approaches have to face heavy tasks of minimizing or maximizing a given localization functional typically of many adjacent local extrema, the bottom-up ones have to invoke some tedious procedures for first generating a local basis composed of well-defined occupied and unoccupied subsets and then maintaining or resuming the locality when solving the Hartree-Fock/Kohn-Sham (HF/KS) optimization condition. It is shown here that the good of these kinds of approaches can be combined together to form a very efficient hybrid approach that can generate the desired LMOs for any kind of gapped molecules. Specifically, a top-down localization functional, applied to individual small subsystems only, is minimized to generate an orthonormal local basis composed of functions centered on the preset chemical fragments. The familiar notion for atomic cores, lone pairs, and chemical bonds emerges here automatically. Such a local basis is then employed in the global HF/KS calculation, after which a least action is taken toward the final orthonormal localized molecular orbitals (LMO), both occupied and virtual. This last step is very cheap, implying that, after the CMOs, the LMOs can be obtained essentially for free. Because molecular fragments are taken as the basic elements, the approach is in the spirit of "from fragments to molecule". Two representatives of highly conjugated molecules, that is, C12H2 and C60, are taken as showcases for demonstrating the success of the proposed approach. The use of the so-obtained LMOs will lead naturally to low-order scaling post-HF/KS methods for electron correlation or excitation. In addition, the underlying fragment picture allows for easy and pictorial interpretations of the correlation/excitation dynamics.

[1]  Frank Weinhold,et al.  Natural hybrid orbitals , 1980 .

[2]  Shuhua Li,et al.  An efficient linear scaling procedure for constructing localized orbitals of large molecules based on the one-particle density matrix. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Stefano Evangelisti,et al.  Direct generation of local orbitals for multireference treatment and subsequent uses for the calculation of the correlation energy , 2002 .

[4]  Feng Long Gu,et al.  Effective preconditioning for ab initio ground state energy minimization with non-orthogonal localized molecular orbitals. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[5]  Poul Jørgensen,et al.  Trust Region Minimization of Orbital Localization Functions. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[6]  W. Niessen Density localization of atomic and molecular orbitals , 1973 .

[7]  Kasper Kristensen,et al.  Local Hartree–Fock orbitals using a three‐level optimization strategy for the energy , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  Frank Weinhold,et al.  Natural bond orbital analysis of near‐Hartree–Fock water dimer , 1983 .

[9]  Branislav Jansík,et al.  Maximum locality in occupied and virtual orbital spaces using a least-change strategy. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  T. Zoboki,et al.  Extremely localized nonorthogonal orbitals by the pairing theorem , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Paul G. Mezey,et al.  A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable for ab initio and semiempirical linear combination of atomic orbital wave functions , 1989 .

[12]  W. Lipscomb,et al.  Localized molecular orbitals for polyatomic molecules , 1975 .

[13]  A. Perico,et al.  Uniform Localization of Atomic and Molecular Orbitals. II , 1967 .

[14]  Junzi Liu,et al.  Photoexcitation of Light-Harvesting C-P-C60 Triads: A FLMO-TD-DFT Study. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Frank Weinhold,et al.  Natural localized molecular orbitals , 1985 .

[16]  Hermann Stoll,et al.  On the use of local basis sets for localized molecular orbitals , 1980 .

[17]  Michael Dolg,et al.  The Beijing four-component density functional program package (BDF) and its application to EuO, EuS, YbO and YbS , 1997 .

[18]  Klaus Ruedenberg,et al.  Localized Atomic and Molecular Orbitals. II , 1965 .

[19]  M. Persico,et al.  Quasi-bond orbitals from maximum-localization hybrids for ab initio CI calculations , 1995 .

[20]  Mario Raimondi,et al.  Modification of the Roothaan equations to exclude BSSE from molecular interaction calculations , 1996 .

[21]  Y. Aoki,et al.  An elongation method for large systems toward bio-systems. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[22]  Jean-Paul Malrieu,et al.  Direct determination of localized Hartree–Fock orbitals as a step toward N scaling procedures , 1997 .

[23]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Pipek-Mezey Orbital Localization Using Various Partial Charge Estimates. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  Stinne Høst,et al.  Local orbitals by minimizing powers of the orbital variance. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  Lorenz S. Cederbaum,et al.  Block diagonalisation of Hermitian matrices , 1989 .

[26]  Wenjian Liu,et al.  Linear-Scaling Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Based on the Idea of "From Fragments to Molecule". , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  Susi Lehtola,et al.  Unitary Optimization of Localized Molecular Orbitals. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[28]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  Fast localized orthonormal virtual orbitals which depend smoothly on nuclear coordinates. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  B. Kirtman,et al.  A new localization scheme for the elongation method. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  W. Niessen,et al.  Density localization of atomic and molecular orbitals , 1973 .

[31]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[32]  Klaus Ruedenberg,et al.  Localized Atomic and Molecular Orbitals , 1963 .

[33]  S. F. Boys,et al.  Canonical Configurational Interaction Procedure , 1960 .

[34]  J. Korchowiec,et al.  Fast orbital localization scheme in molecular fragments resolution. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[35]  Francesco Aquilante,et al.  Fast noniterative orbital localization for large molecules. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[36]  Joseph E. Subotnik,et al.  An efficient method for calculating maxima of homogeneous functions of orthogonal matrices: applications to localized occupied orbitals. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[37]  S. F. Boys Construction of Some Molecular Orbitals to Be Approximately Invariant for Changes from One Molecule to Another , 1960 .

[38]  Werner Kutzelnigg,et al.  Quasirelativistic theory. II. Theory at matrix level. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[39]  Y. Mo,et al.  Theoretical analysis of electronic delocalization , 1998 .

[40]  P. Jørgensen,et al.  A perspective on the localizability of Hartree–Fock orbitals , 2013, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts.

[41]  P. Jørgensen,et al.  Orbital localization using fourth central moment minimization. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[42]  Shubin Liu,et al.  Nonorthogonal localized molecular orbitals in electronic structure theory , 2000 .

[43]  Luis Seijo,et al.  Parallel, linear-scaling building-block and embedding method based on localized orbitals and orbital-specific basis sets. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.