An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants

A preoperative planning system for oral implant surgery was developed which takes as input computed tomographies (CT's) of the jaws. Two-dimensional (2-D) reslices of these axial CT slices orthogonal to a curve following the jaw arch are computed and shown together with three-dimensional (3-D) surface rendered models of the bone and computer-aided design (CAD)-like implant models. A technique is developed for scanning and visualizing an eventual existing removable prosthesis together with the bone structures. Evaluation of the planning done with the system shows a difference between 2-D and 3-D planning methods. Validation studies measure the benefits of the 3-D approach by comparing plans made in 2-D mode only with those further adjusted using the full 3-D visualization capabilities of the system. The benefits of a 3-D approach are then evident where a prosthesis is involved in the planning. For the majority of the patients, clinically important adjustments and optimizations to the 2-D plans are made once the 3-D visualization is enabled, effectively resulting in a better plan. The alterations are related to bone quality and quantity (p<0.05), biomechanics (p<0.005), and esthetics (p<0.005), and are so obvious that the 3-D plan stands out clearly (p<0.005). The improvements often avoid complications such as mandibular nerve damage, sinus perforations, fenestrations, or dehiscences.

[1]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Radiographic Planning and Assessment of Endosseous Oral Implants , 1998 .

[2]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Jaw Bone Quality and Quantity , 1998 .

[3]  A B Reiskin,et al.  Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments. , 1998, Dental clinics of North America.

[4]  J. Cobo,et al.  Profile surgical template: a systematic approach to precise implant placement. A technical note. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  William Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3-D Graphics , 1997 .

[6]  Guy Marchal,et al.  A Flexible Environment for Image Guided Virtual Surgery Planning , 1996, VBC.

[7]  S. Ekholm,et al.  Low-dose tomographic techniques for dental implant planning. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  Stefan Seipel,et al.  Virtual Reality Techniques in Three-Dimensional Oral Implantology , 1996 .

[9]  P Suetens,et al.  Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a three-dimensional approach. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  P Suetens,et al.  Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery. An approach using virtual reality. , 1996, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[11]  A Wagner,et al.  Virtual image guided navigation in tumor surgery--technical innovation. , 1995, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[12]  J L Coudert,et al.  Computer-assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[13]  Tom Davis,et al.  Opengl programming guide: the official guide to learning opengl , 1993 .

[14]  A Sethi,et al.  Precise site location for implants using CT scans: a technical note. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  M K Jeffcoat,et al.  Digital radiology for implant treatment planning and evaluation. , 1992, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[16]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[18]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.