Board Interlocking and IT Governance: Proposed Conceptual Model

This paper seeks to present a new dimension to the dimensions of IT governance; it proposes a model for the board interlocking and the IT governance. This conceptual model is based primarily on the Resource Dependence theory and tries to interpret the relationship between the board interlocking and the IT governance. This paper has theoretically reviewed the existing literature of the board interlocking; it has also added to the real gap in the literature of corporate governance which has not explained the importance of the board interlocking with IT governance. The researchers hope to provides a solid foundation for IT governance in order to supply companies with information about the IT environment surrounding it, the operating procedures, and the effective monitoring of the information systems, the challenges they face, the opportunities they may have, and to provide members of the board of directors with neutral opinion about these opportunities and challenges. The paper presents several contributions at both theoretical and practical levels; it paves the way for researchers to discuss the board interlocking with IT governance which contributes to the development of the theories governing the work of these concepts. It also draws the attention of the companies’ administration to one of the most important practices in forming and structuring the board, i.e. the necessity of connecting the board of directors with managers who are qualified with practical experience in information systems.

[1]  L. White,et al.  Why Do CEOS Reciprocally Sit on Each Other's Boards? , 2000 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Speed and Strategic Choice: How Managers Accelerate Decision Making , 1990 .

[3]  S. Teoh,et al.  Board Interlocks and Earnings Management Contagion , 2010 .

[4]  Christine Shropshire,et al.  The Role of the Interlocking Director and Board Receptivity in the Diffusion of Practices , 2010 .

[5]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[6]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  The Power and Functions of Boards of Directors: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Qian Wang,et al.  Internal and external influences on IT control governance , 2007, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Lawrence Gales,et al.  An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations , 1994 .

[9]  Lesley J. Stainbank,et al.  SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN , 2013 .

[10]  Mahfoudh Abdul Karem Al-Musalli,et al.  Intellectual Capital Performance and Board Characteristics of GCC Banks , 2012 .

[11]  O. Williamson The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[12]  Eliezer M. Fich,et al.  Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors? , 2004 .

[13]  P. Dooley The Interlocking Directorate , 1969 .

[14]  Romualdo Douglas Colauto,et al.  A Relação entre Board Interlocking e as Práticas de Suavização de Resultados , 2016 .

[15]  Justin Mindzak Interlocked Boards of Directors, Voluntary Disclosures and Earnings Quality , 2013 .

[16]  Michael J. Mol,et al.  Creating wealth through working with others: Interorganizational relationships , 2001 .

[17]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature , 2000 .

[18]  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[19]  G. Davis Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[20]  Michael Patrick Allen,et al.  The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates , 1974 .

[21]  F. Ribeiro The Relationship Between Board Interlocking and Income Smoothing Practices * , 2016 .

[22]  Kevin Au,et al.  Interlocking Directorates, Firm Strategies, and Performance in Hong Kong: Towards a Research Agenda , 2000 .

[23]  Pamela R. Haunschild Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity , 1993 .

[24]  Michael Ornstein,et al.  INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES IN CANADA: EVIDENCE FROM REPLACEMENT PATTERNS * , 1982 .

[25]  Yangmin Kim,et al.  Board Network Characteristics and Firm Performance in Korea , 2005 .

[26]  Rafael Liza Santos,et al.  Board Interlocking no Brasil: A Participac ¸ ˜ ao de Conselheiros em M´ ultiplas Companhias e seu Efeito sobre o Valor das Empresas , 2007 .