Investigation of thin/well-tunable liquid/gas diffusion layers exhibiting superior multifunctional performance in low-temperature electrolytic water splitting

Liquid/gas diffusion layers (LGDLs), which are located between the catalyst layer (CL) and bipolar plate (BP), play an important role in enhancing the performance of water splitting in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells (PEMECs). They are expected to transport electrons, heat, and reactants/products simultaneously with minimum voltage, current, thermal, interfacial, and fluidic losses. In this study, the thin titanium-based LGDLs with straight-through pores and well-defined pore morphologies are comprehensively investigated for the first time. The novel LGDL with a 400 μm pore size and 0.7 porosity achieved a best-ever performance of 1.66 V at 2 A cm−2 and 80 °C, as compared to the published literature. The thin/well-tunable titanium based LGDLs remarkably reduce ohmic and activation losses, and it was found that porosity has a more significant impact on performance than pore size. In addition, an appropriate equivalent electrical circuit model has been established to quantify the effects of pore morphologies. The rapid electrochemical reaction phenomena at the center of the PEMEC are observed by coupling with high-speed and micro-scale visualization systems. The observed reactions contribute reasonable and pioneering data that elucidate the effects of porosity and pore size on the PEMEC performance. This study can be a new guide for future research and development towards high-efficiency and low-cost hydrogen energy.

[1]  Todd J. Toops,et al.  Discovery of true electrochemical reactions for ultrahigh catalyst mass activity in water splitting , 2016, Science Advances.

[2]  Todd J. Toops,et al.  Thin liquid/gas diffusion layers for high-efficiency hydrogen production from water splitting , 2016 .

[3]  L. Giordano,et al.  Activity and stability of cobalt phosphides for hydrogen evolution upon water splitting , 2016 .

[4]  Xiaodong Zhuang,et al.  Vertically oriented cobalt selenide/NiFe layered-double-hydroxide nanosheets supported on exfoliated graphene foil: an efficient 3D electrode for overall water splitting , 2016 .

[5]  Jingke Mo,et al.  Effects of membrane electrode assembly properties on two-phase transport and performance in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells , 2016 .

[6]  Todd J. Toops,et al.  Electrochemical investigation of stainless steel corrosion in a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cell , 2015 .

[7]  Dan Wang,et al.  Multi-shelled hollow micro-/nanostructures. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[8]  Scott T. Retterer,et al.  Mask-Patterned Wet Etching of Thin Titanium Liquid/Gas Diffusion Layers for a PEMEC , 2015 .

[9]  Hwanyeong Oh,et al.  Effects of pore size gradient in the substrate of a gas diffusion layer on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2015 .

[10]  Jingke Mo,et al.  Electrochemical performance modeling of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cell for hydrogen energy , 2015 .

[11]  Yang Shao-Horn,et al.  Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis , 2015 .

[12]  Matthew R. Shaner,et al.  Experimental demonstrations of spontaneous, solar-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting , 2015 .

[13]  Zhigang Shao,et al.  Behaviors of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer under water starvation , 2015 .

[14]  Demetri Psaltis,et al.  Design and cost considerations for practical solar-hydrogen generators , 2014 .

[15]  Huijun Zhao,et al.  Two-dimensional carbon leading to new photoconversion processes. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[16]  Huaneng Su,et al.  Membrane electrode assemblies with low noble metal loadings for hydrogen production from solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis , 2013 .

[17]  Tetsuya Yoshida,et al.  Influence of pore structural properties of current collectors on the performance of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer , 2013 .

[18]  D. Stolten,et al.  A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis , 2013 .

[19]  Robert Kostecki,et al.  Nanomaterials for renewable energy production and storage. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[20]  Tetsuya Yoshida,et al.  Experimentalstudy on porouscurrentcollectors of PEMelectrolyzers , 2012 .

[21]  Tetsuya Yoshida,et al.  Effect of titanium powder loading in gas diffusion layer of a polymer electrolyte unitized reversible fuel cell , 2012 .

[22]  Dan Wang,et al.  Recent advances in micro-/nano-structured hollow spheres for energy applications: From simple to complex systems , 2012 .

[23]  Jianling Li,et al.  The electrocatalytic properties of an IrO2/SnO2 catalyst using SnO2 as a support and an assisting reagent for the oxygen evolution reaction , 2012 .

[24]  J. Vohs,et al.  Energy Storage in Electrochemical Cells with Molten Sb Electrodes , 2012 .

[25]  Juan Bisquert,et al.  Identifying charge and mass transfer resistances of an oxygen reducing biocathode , 2011 .

[26]  Nathan S. Lewis,et al.  Proton exchange membrane electrolysis sustained by water vapor , 2011 .

[27]  Everett B. Anderson,et al.  Initial Performance and Durability of Ultra-Low Loaded NSTF Electrodes for PEM Electrolyzers , 2011 .

[28]  Xin-dong Wang,et al.  A novel catalyst layer with hydrophilic―hydrophobic meshwork and pore structure for solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis , 2011 .

[29]  S. Holdcroft,et al.  Hydrocarbon proton conducting polymers for fuel cell catalyst layers , 2011 .

[30]  J. Weidner,et al.  Multimetallic Electrocatalysts of Pt, Ru, and Ir Supported on Anatase and Rutile TiO2 for Oxygen Evolution in an Acid Environment , 2011 .

[31]  Yasuo Hasegawa,et al.  Influence of properties of gas diffusion layers on the performance of polymer electrolyte-based unit , 2011 .

[32]  N. Bjerrum,et al.  Corrosion behaviour of construction materials for high temperature steam electrolysers , 2011 .

[33]  Hong-Joo Lee,et al.  Analyses of interfacial resistances in a membrane-electrode assembly for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using symmetrical impedance spectroscopy. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  Jérôme Dillet,et al.  Effect of Oxygen Depletion Along the Air Channel of a PEMFC on the Warburg Diffusion Impedance , 2010 .

[35]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Preparation and characterization of nanomaterials for sustainable energy production. , 2010, ACS nano.

[36]  John A. Turner,et al.  Reviewing Metallic PEMFC Bipolar Plates , 2010 .

[37]  H. Salehfar,et al.  ac Impedance Study of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack Under Various Loading Conditions , 2010 .

[38]  B. Popov,et al.  High-durability titanium bipolar plate modified by electrochemical deposition of platinum for unitized regenerative fuel cell (URFC) , 2010 .

[39]  Kamaruzzaman Sopian,et al.  Review of the membrane and bipolar plates materials for conventional and unitized regenerative fuel cells , 2009 .

[40]  Shengmin Guo,et al.  Design and Testing of a Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cell , 2009 .

[41]  Gang Chen,et al.  Nanoscale design to enable the revolution in renewable energy , 2009, Energy & Environmental Science.

[42]  Pierre Millet,et al.  Optimization of porous current collectors for PEM water electrolysers , 2009 .

[43]  Claude Etievant,et al.  GenHyPEM: A research program on PEM water electrolysis supported by the European Commission , 2009 .

[44]  Charles W. Forsberg,et al.  Relative economic incentives for hydrogen from nuclear, renewable, and fossil energy sources , 2009 .

[45]  Mehmet Uzunoglu,et al.  Modeling, control and simulation of a PV/FC/UC based hybrid power generation system for stand-alone applications , 2009 .

[46]  K. Karan,et al.  Investigation of Charge-Transfer and Mass-Transport Resistances in PEMFCs with Microporous Layer Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy , 2009 .

[47]  Y. Zhai,et al.  Investigations on high performance proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer , 2009 .

[48]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Performance of a metallic gas diffusion layer for PEM fuel cells , 2008 .

[49]  Matthew M. Mench,et al.  Fuel Cell Engines , 2008 .

[50]  S. Sunde,et al.  Performance of a PEM water electrolysis cell using IrxRuyTazO2 electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution electrode , 2007 .

[51]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Metal foams as flow field and gas diffusion layer in direct methanol fuel cells , 2007 .

[52]  D. Mahajan,et al.  Metal bipolar plates for PEM fuel cell—A review , 2007 .

[53]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering Investigation of a Copper Etching Technique to Fabricate Metallic Gas Diffusion Media , 2022 .

[54]  Michio Hori,et al.  Study on metallic bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2006 .

[55]  S. Grigoriev,et al.  Pure hydrogen production by PEM electrolysis for hydrogen energy , 2006 .

[56]  J. Jorcin,et al.  CPE analysis by local electrochemical impedance spectroscopy , 2006 .

[57]  Michael Kimble,et al.  Solar-powered regenerative PEM electrolyzer/fuel cell system , 2005 .

[58]  F. Barbir.  PEM electrolysis for production of hydrogen from renewable energy sources , 2005 .

[59]  Guoying Chen,et al.  EIS studies of porous oxygen electrodes with discrete particles. I. Impedance of oxide catalyst supports , 2003 .

[60]  Woodrow W. Clark,et al.  Remote power systems with advanced storage technologies for Alaskan villages , 1997 .

[61]  W Smith,et al.  The role of fuel cells in energy storage , 2000 .

[62]  Turner,et al.  A realizable renewable energy future , 1999, Science.

[63]  Time‐Averaged Current Distribution for a Rotating‐Disk Electrode under Periodic Current Reversal Conditions , 1992 .