How Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance Organizes the Social: An Institutional Ethnography

Institutional ethnography is a sociological method of inquiry which problematizes social relations at the local site of lived experience, while examining how series of texts coordinate actions, consciousness, and forms of organization in extra-local settings. This paper will demonstrate that institutional ethnography is a critically innovative way to study the socio-technical dynamics of camera surveillance. Closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance video should be conceptualized as a text which is active and activated, coordinating lived realities and facilitating organization at the institutional level within a specific ruling framework. Research was conducted with camera operators in a Suburban Mall CCTV control room located in Victoria, BC. The talk of CCTV operators in their work setting demonstrates how video is used to coordinate lived realities and facilitate extra-local organization. The findings of this study suggest the gravity of racialized profiling in everyday surveillance and complicate Foucault's Panopticon metaphor.

[1]  M. Gottdiener.  13. Recapturing the Center: A Semiotic Analysis of Shopping MaUs , 1986 .

[2]  Chris Jenks,et al.  Core Sociological Dichotomies , 1998 .

[3]  C. Norris.  From personal to digital : CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control , 2005 .

[4]  T. Misa,et al.  Modernity and Technology , 2002 .

[5]  R. Ericson,et al.  Governing Modern Societies , 2000 .

[6]  Watching the City: Video, Surveillance, and Resistance , 1996 .

[7]  N. R. Fyfe,et al.  “City Watching: Closed Circuit Television Surveillance in Public Spaces” , 1996 .

[8]  J. Bannister,et al.  'The Eyes upon the Street': Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance and the City , 1998 .

[9]  C. Baldry.  Theories of The Information Society , 1988 .

[10]  D. Smith.  Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling , 1990 .

[11]  Michaelis Lianos.  DANGERIZATION AND THE END OF DEVIANCE The Institutional Environment , 2000 .

[12]  J. Fiske.  Surveilling the City , 1998 .

[13]  L. Johnston.  Public or Private? , 1994, Sport: Law and Practice.

[14]  Marie Campbell,et al.  Knowledge, Experience, and Ruling: Studies in the Social Organization of Knowledge , 1995 .

[15]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[16]  Claire Lawrence.  Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control , 2001 .

[17]  Graham MacPhee.  The Architecture of the Visible: Technology and Urban Visual Culture , 2002 .

[18]  Gillian A. Walker.  Violence and the Relations of Ruling: Lessons from the Battered Women’s Movement , 1995 .

[19]  A. Giddens,et al.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[20]  M. Mccahill.  The surveillance web : the rise of visual surveillance in an English city , 2002 .

[21]  Ronald Beiner,et al.  Canadian Political Philosophy: Contemporary Reflections , 2001 .

[22]  M. Campbell,et al.  Activating the Photographic Text , 1995 .

[23]  Christian Parenti,et al.  The Soft Cage: Surveillance In America From Slavery To The War On Terror , 2003 .

[24]  M. O’Brien.  Foucism, Marxory & Histault: A Critical Appraisal of Poster's Foucault, Marxism and History: Mode of Production versus Mode of Information , 1986 .

[25]  Stephen Graham,et al.  Spaces of Surveillant Simulation: New Technologies, Digital Representations, and Material Geographies , 1998 .

[26]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance as social sorting : privacy, risk, and digital discrimination , 2003 .

[27]  C. Dandeker.  Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day , 1990 .

[28]  Marcus Sanchez Svensson,et al.  Overseeing organizations: configuring action and its environment. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[29]  David Lyon,et al.  Everyday Surveillance: Personal data and social classifications , 2002 .

[30]  R. Ericson,et al.  Policing the Risk Society , 1997 .

[31]  L. M. Goodlad.  Beyond the Panopticon: Victorian Britain and the Critical Imagination , 2003, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[32]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Contested Vision: The Discursive Constitution of Rodney King , 1997 .

[33]  M. Campbell,et al.  Knowledge, experience, and ruling relations : studies in the social organization of knowledge , 1997 .

[34]  Nicholas Mirzoeff,et al.  The visual culture reader , 2002 .

[35]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  A contemporary critique of historical materialism , 1981 .

[36]  Kirstie Ball,et al.  Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life , 2001 .

[37]  G. Macphee.  The architecture of the visible , 2002 .

[38]  Nicholas R. Fyfe,et al.  Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space , 1998 .

[39]  M. Poster.  Foucault, Marxism, and History: Mode of Production Versus Mode of Information , 1984 .

[40]  Michel Callon,et al.  Writing and (Re)writing Devices as Tools for Managing Complexity , 2002, Complexities.

[41]  A. Hunt,et al.  Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology... , 1993 .

[42]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Vol. 1: Power, Property and the State. , 1983 .

[43]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  Undercover: Police Surveillance in America , 1988 .

[44]  R. Boyne.  Post-Panopticism , 2000 .

[45]  D. Smith.  Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions , 2001 .

[46]  B. Curtis.  Surveying the Social: Techniques, Practices, Power , 2002 .

[47]  R. Coleman,et al.  'You'll never walk alone': CCTV surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool city centre. , 2000, The British journal of sociology.

[48]  R. Coleman,et al.  From the Dockyards to the Disney Store: Surveillance, Risk and Security in Liverpool City Centre , 1998 .

[49]  Martin Jay,et al.  Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought , 1993 .

[50]  N. Rose.  Government and control , 2000 .

[51]  Britt-Louise Gunnarsson,et al.  The Construction of Professional Discourse , 1997 .

[52]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations , 2003 .

[53]  D. Smith.  Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations , 1999 .

[54]  Alexander R. Cuthbert,et al.  Designing cities : critical readings in urban design , 2003 .

[55]  D. Garland,et al.  Criminology and Social Theory , 2000 .

[56]  M. DeVault,et al.  36 Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations , 2001 .

[57]  David Murakami Wood,et al.  Social Control after Foucault. , 2003 .

[58]  J. Law,et al.  Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices , 2002 .

[59]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Interaction in Isolation: The Dislocated World of the London Underground Train Driver , 1999 .

[60]  T. Mathiesen,et al.  The Viewer Society , 1997 .

[61]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[62]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[63]  Z. Bauman.  Globalization: The Human Consequences , 1998 .

[64]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance society: Monitoring Everyday Life , 2001 .

[65]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[66]  G. Armstrong,et al.  The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV , 1999 .