The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research.

Next-generation sequencing and global data sharing challenge many of the governance mechanisms currently in place to protect the privacy of research participants. These challenges will make it more difficult to guarantee anonymity for participants, provide information to satisfy the requirements of informed consent, and ensure complete withdrawal from research when requested. To move forward, we need to improve the current governance systems for research so that they are responsive to individual privacy concerns but can also be effective at a global level. We need to develop a system of e-governance that can complement existing governance systems but that places greater reliance on the use of technology to ensure compliance with ethical and legal requirements. These new governance structures must be able to address the concerns of research participants while at the same time ensuring effective data sharing that promotes public trust in genomics research.

[1]  Kelly Edwards,et al.  From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  J. Kaye.  Governing biobanks: understanding the interplay between law and practice , 2012 .

[3]  Neil Pearce,et al.  Data sharing: not as simple as it seems , 2011, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[4]  M. Bamshad,et al.  Genomics really gets personal: How exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[5]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Genomics and Privacy: Implications of the New Reality of Closed Data for the Field , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  S. Holm.  Withdrawing from Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks , 2011, Health Care Analysis.

[7]  A. Guttmacher,et al.  Genomics, Health Care, and Society , 2011 .

[8]  Andrew D. Johnson,et al.  Temporal Trends in Results Availability from Genome-Wide Association Studies , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[9]  R. Gallagher,et al.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[10]  Jane Kaye,et al.  From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance , 2011, Human Genetics.

[11]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  Melissa A. Basford,et al.  Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience. , 2011, Genome research.

[13]  L. Ciaccia,et al.  The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks , 2010, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[14]  Elaine R. Mardis,et al.  A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology , 2011, Nature.

[15]  Stephanie M. Fullerton,et al.  Research Practice and Participant Preferences: The Growing Gulf , 2011, Science.

[16]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Consent forms in genomics: the difference between law and practice. , 2011, European journal of health law.

[17]  K. Hudson.  Genomics, health care, and society. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Wendy A. Wolf,et al.  The eMERGE Network: A consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[19]  Kelly Edwards,et al.  Building a chain of trust: using policy and practice to enhance trustworthy clinical data discovery and sharing , 2010, GTIP '10.

[20]  G. Laurie,et al.  Managing Access to Biobanks: How Can We Reconcile Individual Privacy and Public Interests in Genetic Research? , 2010 .

[21]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Glad You Asked: Participants' Opinions of Re-Consent for DbGap Data Submission , 2010, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[22]  D. Butler.  Human genome at ten: Science after the sequence , 2010, Nature.

[23]  D. M. Gitter.  The Challenges of Achieving Open Source Sharing of Biobank Data , 2010 .

[24]  王家志.  Internet（互连网）简介 , 1994 .

[25]  T. Lumley,et al.  Potential for revealing individual-level information in genome-wide association studies. , 2010, JAMA.

[26]  Bradley Malin,et al.  Technical and Policy Approaches to Balancing Patient Privacy and Data Sharing in Clinical and Translational Research , 2010, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[27]  N. Hallowell,et al.  An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[28]  F. Bowden.  When two tribes go to war , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[29]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance , 2009 .

[30]  E. Mardis,et al.  A focus on personal genomics. , 2009, Personalized medicine.

[31]  G. Church,et al.  Public Access to Genome-Wide Data: Five Views on Balancing Research with Privacy and Protection , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[32]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Broad Consent in Biobanking: Reflections on Seemingly Insurmountable Dilemmas , 2009 .

[33]  Roger D. Cox,et al.  A Mouse Model for the Metabolic Effects of the Human Fat Mass and Obesity Associated FTO Gene , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[34]  Phil Andrews,et al.  Recommendations from the 2008 International Summit on Proteomics Data Release and Sharing Policy: the Amsterdam principles. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[35]  N. Hawkins,et al.  Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  J. Gitschier,et al.  Inferential genotyping of Y chromosomes in Latter-Day Saints founders and comparison to Utah samples in the HapMap project. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[37]  N. Day.  Commentary: How small is small? , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  P. Visscher,et al.  On Jim Watson's APOE status: genetic information is hard to hide , 2009, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[39]  klaguia.  Prepublication Data Sharing , 2009 .

[40]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement , 2009, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[41]  K. Zatloukal,et al.  [Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). Implications for pathology]. , 2008, Der Pathologe.

[42]  C. Viertler,et al.  Biobanken und Biomolekulare Ressourcen Forschungsinfrastruktur (BBMRI) , 2008, Der Pathologe.

[43]  S. Nelson,et al.  Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[44]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issues. , 2008, Pharmacogenomics.

[45]  B. Ness,et al.  Genomic Research and Incidental Findings , 2008 .

[46]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[47]  G. Church,et al.  From genetic privacy to open consent , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[48]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[49]  A. McGuire,et al.  Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[50]  Siobhan M. Dolan,et al.  Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[51]  Susanne B Haga,et al.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research. , 2008, Advances in genetics.

[52]  R. Gertz.  Withdrawing from participating in a biobank--a comparative study. , 2008, European journal of health law.

[53]  A. McGuire,et al.  DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[54]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology , 2008 .

[55]  P. Donnelly,et al.  New models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: the Genetic Association Information Network , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[56]  D. Winickoff.  Partnership in U.K. Biobank: A Third Way for Genomic Property? , 2007, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[57]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Our social genome? , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[58]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding , 2007, Data Sci. J..

[59]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls , 2007, Nature.

[60]  Russ B Altman,et al.  Health-information altruists--a potentially critical resource. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[61]  R. Gibbs.  Deeper into the genome , 2005, Nature.

[62]  Mark I McCarthy,et al.  What makes a good genetic association study? , 2005, The Lancet.

[63]  John Gillott,et al.  Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA , 2005 .

[64]  Free genome databases finally defeat Celera , 2005, Nature.

[65]  Anne Cambon-Thomsen,et al.  The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[66]  H. Busby.  Blood donation for genetic research: what can we learn from donors’ narratives? , 2004 .

[67]  R. Tutton,et al.  Genetic Databases : Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA , 2004 .

[68]  B. Lo,et al.  Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials. , 2004, IRB.

[69]  Vilhjalmur Arnason,et al.  Coding and Consent: Moral Challenges of the Database Project in Iceland , 2004, Bioethics.

[70]  J. Otten,et al.  The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[72]  D. Winickoff,et al.  The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  F. Collins,et al.  The Human Genome Project: Lessons from Large-Scale Biology , 2003, Science.

[74]  R. Tutton.  Gift Relationships in Genetics Research , 2002, Science as culture.

[75]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[76]  M Gwinn,et al.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. , 2001, JAMA.

[77]  Human genomes, public and private , 2001, Nature.

[78]  D. Mazur.  Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research , 1999 .

[79]  J. D. Watson.  The human genome project: past, present, and future. , 1990, Science.

[80]  James M. Orten,et al.  Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals , 1950 .