Comparison of distributed space and frequency interference alignment

This paper addresses multiple access in MIMO wireless networks. It compares two distributed interference alignment techniques, in space and in frequency, that both aim at removing interferences through orthogonalization. The theoretical advantages and drawbacks of each technique are highlighted. Then, the multiplexing gain and the computational complexity are analytically evaluated. It is shown that frequency interference alignment achieves a higher multiplexing gain than space interference alignment in realistic network conditions, and always requires a lower computational complexity. Finally, the performances of both algorithms with varying number of interfering links are assessed via numerical simulations. Space interference alignment fulfills complete interference suppression, and consequently provides the same spectral efficiency to all links, regardless of the number of interfering links. Frequency interference alignment is less efficient in terms of INR, and the spectral efficiency per link thus decreases when the number of links increases. Nevertheless, the spectral efficiency is always higher with frequency interference alignment than with space interference alignment.

[1]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Communication Over MIMO X Channels: Interference Alignment, Decomposition, and Performance Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Interference alignment via alternating minimization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[3]  Leonardo S. Cardoso,et al.  Vandermonde frequency division multiplexing for cognitive radio , 2008, 2008 IEEE 9th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications.

[4]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Degrees of Freedom of the $K$-User Interference Channel , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Spatial Degrees of Freedom for the K User Interference Channel , 2007, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[6]  Reinaldo A Valenzuela,et al.  Link-optimal BLAST processing with multiple-access interference , 2000, Vehicular Technology Conference Fall 2000. IEEE VTS Fall VTC2000. 52nd Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37152).

[7]  A. H. Kayran,et al.  On Feasibility of Interference Alignment in MIMO Interference Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Approaching the Capacity of Wireless Networks through Distributed Interference Alignment , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[9]  S. Jafar,et al.  Degrees of freedom of the K user MIMO interference channel , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[10]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  Opportunistic interference alignment in MIMO interference channels , 2008, 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[11]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  SPC10-2: Iterative Water-filling for Optimal Resource Allocation in OFDM Multiple-Access and Broadcast Channels , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[12]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Interference alignment on the deterministic channel and application to fully connected AWGN interference networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE Information Theory Workshop.

[13]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Real Interference Alignment with Real Numbers , 2009, ArXiv.

[14]  Sae-Young Chung,et al.  On the beamforming design for efficient interference alignment , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[15]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Network Duality for Multiuser MIMO Beamforming Networks and Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[16]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Interference Alignment for Line-of-Sight Channels , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.