Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition

Although it is generally accepted that the word length effect in short-term memory operates through output delay or interference, there is less agreement on whether it also influences performance through its impact on rehearsal. We investigated this issue by studying the effect of word length on recall and on a recognition task in which output delay was controlled. Word sequences were repeated exactly, or with one pair of words reversed. Two experiments using auditory presentation showed clear word length effects for both recall and serial recognition, although the magnitude of the effect tended to be less for recognition. A third experiment using visual presentation studied the effect of articulatory suppression during the recognition test; again we found a clear word length effect. It is concluded that the word length effect can influence retention through both rehearsal and output factors, as proposed by the phonological loop hypothesis.

[1]  B. Boruff,et al.  Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  N. Burgess,et al.  Toward a network model of the articulatory loop , 1992, Connectionist psychology: A text with readings.

[3]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Speech Rate and the Development of Short-Term Memory Span. , 1984 .

[4]  R. Henson.  Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .

[6]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[7]  S. Avons,et al.  The Word-Length Effect in Probed and Serial Recall , 1994 .

[8]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Modeling Item Length Effects in Memory Span: No Rehearsal Needed? , 1995 .

[9]  L. Henry,et al.  The Effects of Word Length and Phonemic Similarity in Young Children's Short-term Memory , 1991 .

[10]  G. Hitch,et al.  Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. , 1999 .

[11]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[12]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Do two separate speech measures constrain verbal short-term memory in children? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Elisabet Service,et al.  The Effect of Word Length on Immediate Serial Recall Depends on Phonological Complexity, Not Articulatory Duration , 1998 .

[14]  I Neath,et al.  Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  D. J. Murray.  Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. , 1968 .

[16]  N. Cowan,et al.  Is There a Temporal Basis of the Word Length Effect? A Response to Service (1998) , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  J. F. Mackworth.  The duration of the visual image. , 1963 .

[18]  J. Richardson,et al.  Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[19]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[20]  M. Treisman,et al.  There Are Two Word-Length Effects in Verbal Short-Term Memory: Opposed Effects of Duration and Complexity , 1997 .

[21]  S. Pickering,et al.  Dissociable Lexical and Phonological Influences on Serial Recognition and Serial Recall , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[23]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[24]  D. Norman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DATA OBTAINED WITH DIFFERENT FALSE-ALARM RATES. , 1964, Psychological review.

[25]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory. , 1992 .

[26]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span , 1991 .

[27]  John Brown,et al.  RECOGNITION ASSESSED BY RATING AND RANKING , 1974 .

[28]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Verbal Memory Span in Children: Speech Timing Clues to the Mechanisms Underlying Age and Word Length Effects , 1994 .

[29]  N. Cowan,et al.  Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Memory-Search and Rehearsal Processes and the Word Length Effect in Immediate Recall: A Synthesis in Reply to Service , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  V. Coltheart,et al.  Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: Effects of phonological similarity and word length , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Verbal memory span and the timing of spoken recall , 1992 .

[33]  B A Dosher,et al.  Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  E. Service.  Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: different paradigms answer different questions. A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  G. Waters,et al.  Articulatory Length and Phonological Similarity in Span Tasks: A Reply to Baddeley and Andrade , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  A. J. Hull,et al.  Prefix and suffix effects: Do they have a common basis? , 1979 .

[37]  S E Avons,et al.  The Word-length Effect and Disyllabic Words , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.