Cover: Predicting habitat quality for Great Tits (Parus major) with airborne laser scanning data

1. Overview Habitat quality is a fundamental concept in ecology that is difficult to quantify objectively. In avian ecology, habitat quality is often inferred from demographic rates (Riddington and Gosler 1995), patterns of territory occupancy and stability (Matthysen 1990), or measurements of resource availability (Seki and Takano 1998). Vegetation structure is an important component of bird habitat quality (Fuller and Henderson 1992, Beier and Drennan 1997). For woodland birds, mapping the three-dimensional complexity of their habitat by field survey can be a timeconsuming and difficult task. Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is a remote sensing technique, operating on a principle of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) that supplies fine-grained information on vegetation structure at a woodland scale (Næsset 2002). The cover image (and figure 1) shows a predictive map of reproductive performance in Great Tits (Parus major) based on a woodland canopy height model derived from ALS data. Since Great Tits feed their young on treedwelling lepidopteran larvae, canopy structure influences habitat quality via effects on both food abundance and its availability to the birds. Such remote quantification of habitat quality could greatly enhance our ability to predict impacts of changing environmental pressures on biodiversity.

[1]  R. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of breeding songbirds in Bradfield Woods, Suffolk, in relation to vegetation and coppice management , 1992 .

[2]  Peter Rothery,et al.  Influence of woodland area on breeding success in Great Tits Parus major and Blue Tits Parus caeruleus , 1999 .

[3]  E. Matthysen Behavioral and Ecological Correlates of Territory Quality in the Eurasian Nuthatch (Sitta europaea) , 1990 .

[4]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[5]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources , 1999 .

[6]  D. Engle,et al.  AVIAN RESPONSE TO LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN FRAGMENTED SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS GRASSLANDS , 2001 .

[7]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[8]  B. Naef-Daenzer,et al.  Differential post-fledging survival of great and coal tits in relation to their condition and fledging date , 2001 .

[9]  Paul Beier,et al.  FOREST STRUCTURE AND PREY ABUNDANCE IN FORAGING AREAS OF NORTHERN GOSHAWKS , 1997 .

[10]  Shinichi Seki,et al.  Caterpillar abundance in the territory affects the breeding performance of great tit Parus major minor , 1998, Oecologia.

[11]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning , 2002 .

[12]  Juha Merilä,et al.  Breeding success in Blue tits: good territories or good parents? , 2001 .

[13]  Edward O. Minot,et al.  Effects of Interspecific Competition for Food in Breeding Blue and Great Tits , 1981 .