Strategies for growth in the media and communications industry: Does size really matter?

Abstract This empirical study examines potential size effects in the US media and communications industry. Motivated by investors’ demand for continuous profit growth, media and communications executives attempt to leverage size effects, be it by growing the core business or by diversifying into other media segments, thereby exploiting cross‐media synergies. However, contrary to conventional wisdom, the authors could not find a general correlation between size and diversification on the one hand and performance on the other hand. The authors’ reason that exploiting size effects in the media and communications industry is far from simplistic and cross‐media synergies may take more time and effort to leverage than assumed. Therefore, research is recommended to focus on the operational level of size effects and their development over time. For media managers, the findings imply that more emphasis should be placed on strategy implementation and operational effectiveness, rather than on sophisticated M&A and growth initiatives.

[1]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[2]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[3]  W. Nicholson.  Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions , 1972 .

[4]  D. Teece.  ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[5]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[6]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[8]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[9]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[10]  R. Roll,et al.  The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers , 1986 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[12]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[13]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[15]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Corporate Diversification And Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View , 1996 .

[16]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[17]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  The Impact of Size and Age on Firm-Level Performance: Some Evidence from India , 1997 .

[18]  Moshe Farjoun,et al.  The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification , 1998 .

[19]  Richard Makadok,et al.  Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market shares , 1999 .

[20]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  Convergence processes, value constellations and integration strategies in the multimedia business , 1999 .

[21]  B. Lin,et al.  A study of economies of scale and economies of scope in Taiwan international tourist hotels , 2000 .

[22]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Does corporate strategy matter , 2001 .

[23]  Thomas S. Ehrmann,et al.  The bases of successful market entry: The liability of size and of newness in E‐commerce , 2002 .

[24]  Market share: the conduit to future success? , 2002 .

[25]  Insa Sjurts.  Strategien in der Medienbranche , 2002 .

[26]  Graeme K. Deans,et al.  Winning the Merger Endgame: A Playbook for Profiting From Industry Consolidation , 2002 .

[27]  Alec Klein,et al.  Stealing Time: Steve Case, Jerry Levin, and the Collapse of AOL Time Warner , 2003 .