The Blind Men and the Elephant: Towards an Organization of Epistemic Contexts †

In the last two decades of knowledge organization (KO) research, there has been an increasing interest in the context-dependent nature of human knowledge. Contextualism maintains that knowledge is not available in a neutral and objective way, but is always interwoven with the process of knowledge production and the prerequisites of the knower. As a first step towards a systematic organization of epistemic contexts, the concept of knowledge will be considered in its onto- logical (WHAT) and epistemological (WHO) including methodological (HOW) dimensions. In current KO research, however, either the contextualism is not fully implemented (classification-as-ontology) or the ambition for a context-transcending universal KOS seems to have been abandoned (classification-as-epistemology). Based on a combined ontology and epistemology it will be argued that a phenom- ena-based approach to KO as stipulated by the Leon Manifesto, for example, requires a revision of the underlying phenomenon concept as a relation between the known object (WHAT) and the knowing subject (WHO), which is constituted by the application of specific meth- ods (HOW). While traditional subject indexing of documents often relies on the organizing principle "levels of being" (WHAT), for a fu- ture context indexing, two novel principles are proposed, namely "levels of knowing" (WHO) and "integral methodological pluralism" (HOW).

[1]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Concept theory , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  E. Langer,et al.  Higher stages of human development : perspectives on adult growth , 1990 .

[3]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  Classification in context: Relativity, reality, and representation , 2004 .

[4]  G. Orange,et al.  The Three K's A model for knowledge that supports ontology and epistemology , 2002 .

[5]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[6]  Rick Szostak,et al.  Beyond Aboutness: Classifying Causal Links in the Service of Interdisciplinarity , 2009 .

[7]  S. Brier Cybersemiotics: Why Information Is Not Enough , 2008 .

[8]  Roberto Poli The Theory of Levels of Reality and the Difference between Simple and Tangled Hierarchies , 2006 .

[9]  R. Lerner,et al.  The concept of development in contextualism , 1985 .

[10]  Jean Gebser,et al.  Ever Present Origin: Part One: Foundations of the Aperspectival World , 1986 .

[11]  Michael Kleineberg Eine neue Archäologie des Wissens. Rezension zu: Arno Bammé: Homo occidentalis. Von der Anschauung zur Bemächtigung der Welt – Zäsuren abendländischer Epistemologie. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2011 , 2013 .

[12]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Afterword: Ontological, Epistemological and Sociological Dimensions of Domains , 2003 .

[13]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak , 2008, J. Documentation.

[14]  N. Enzer,et al.  Psychogenesis and the History of Science , 1990 .

[15]  Patrice Landry Subject Access: Preparing for the Future , 2011 .

[16]  Louise F. Spiteri,et al.  The classification research group and the theory of integrative levels , 1995 .

[17]  Sanna Talja,et al.  The production of context in information seeking research: a metatheoretical view , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  The modernity of classification , 2011, J. Documentation.

[19]  R. Kitchener,et al.  Genetic epistemology, equilibration and the rationality of scientific change , 1987 .

[20]  Claudio Gnoli,et al.  Categories and Facets in Integrative Levels , 2008 .

[21]  Rick Szostak Comment on Hjørland's concept theory , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Claudio Gnoli,et al.  Metadata About What? Distinguishing Between Ontic, Epistemic, and Documental Dimensions in Knowledge Organization , 2012 .

[23]  Sean Esbjörn-Hargens AN OVERVIEW OF INTEGRAL THEORY An All-Inclusive Framework for the 21st Century , 2009 .

[24]  Claudio Gnoli,et al.  Animals Belonging to the Emperor: Enabling Viewpoint Warrant in Classification , 2011 .

[25]  C. Beghtol Knowledge domains : Multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems , 1998 .

[26]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[27]  Jonathan Y. Tsou Genetic Epistemology and Piaget's Philosophy of Science , 2006 .

[28]  S. Quilley Integrative levels and ‘the Great Evolution’: Organicist biology and the sociology of Norbert Elias , 2010 .

[29]  E. Jantsch The self-organizing universe : scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution , 1980 .

[30]  W. Thompson Coming into being : artifacts and texts in the evolution of consciousness , 1998 .

[31]  Rick Szostak Comment on Hjørland's concept theory , 2010 .

[32]  Elaine Svenonius,et al.  The Epistemological Foundations of Knowledge Representations , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[33]  David Blitz,et al.  Emergent Evolution: Qualitative Novelty and the Levels of Reality , 1992 .

[34]  S. Berrol Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice , 1992 .

[35]  B. Nicolescu,et al.  Methodology of Transdisciplinarity-Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity , 2010 .

[36]  K. Wilber AN INTEGRAL THEORY OF CONSCIOUSNESS , 1997 .

[37]  Cognition, Language, and Consciousness: Integrative Levels , 1987 .

[38]  A. Combs,et al.  Sign, information, and consciousness. , 2000 .

[39]  E. Jacob The legacy of pragmatism: implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe , 2014 .

[40]  F. C. P. Motta The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[41]  J. Mai A Postmodern Theory of Knowledge Organization. , 1999 .

[42]  Ingetraut Dahlberg,et al.  The Information Coding Classification (ICC): A Modern, Theory-Based Fully-Faceted, Universal System of Knowledge Fields , 2008 .

[43]  Roberto Poli,et al.  Levels of reality and levels of representation , 2004 .

[44]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Reason and the rationalization of society , 1984 .

[45]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Knowing Levels and Developmental Stages , 1986 .

[46]  M. Bekoff,et al.  Integral Ecology: Uniting Multiple Perspectives on the Natural World , 2009 .

[47]  A. Combs Consciousness Explained Better: Towards an Integral Understanding of the Multifaceted Nature of Consciousness , 2009 .

[48]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  Jens-Erik Mai,et al.  The Future of General Classification , 2003 .

[50]  Jean Gebser The Ever-Present Origin , 1985 .

[51]  T. Huff Journal of Classical Sociology , 2022 .

[52]  Sarah Ann Scott Huckaby An Enquiry into the Theory of Integrative Levels as the Basis for a Generalized Classification Scheme. , 1972 .

[53]  Modernism, Postmodernism, and Interdisciplinarity , 2007 .

[54]  R. Willis,et al.  The foundations of primitive thought , 1979 .

[55]  B. Weinberg Why indexing fails the researcher , 1988, The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 16, Issue 1.

[56]  K. Wilber Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution , 1995 .

[57]  Søren Brier,et al.  What is a possible ontological and epistemological framework for a true universal ‘information science'?: The suggestion of a cybersemiotics , 1997 .

[58]  James K. Feibleman An Ontology of Knowledge , 1962 .

[59]  K. Wilber Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy , 1999 .

[60]  T. Feinberg The nested neural hierarchy and the self , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[61]  Mark H. Bickhard On why constructivism does not yield relativism , 1993, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[62]  Mauri Kaipainen,et al.  Epistemic pluralism and multi-perspective knowledge organization : Explorative conceptualization of topical content domains , 2011 .

[63]  Roberto Poli,et al.  The Basic Problem of the Theory of Levels of Reality , 2001 .

[64]  Søren Brier,et al.  Cybersemiotics: a New Interdisciplinary Development Applied to the Problems of Knowledge Organisation and Document Retrieval in Information Science , 1996, J. Documentation.

[65]  L. Goldmann Towards a Sociology of the Novel , 1963 .

[66]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval , 2005, J. Documentation.

[67]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays , 1992 .

[68]  J. Feibleman THEORY OF INTEGRATIVE LEVELS* , 1954, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[69]  Søren Brier,et al.  Trans‐scientific frameworks of knowing: complementarity views of the different types of human knowledge* , 2000 .

[70]  D. J. Foskett,et al.  The theory of integrative levels and its relevance to the design of information systems , 1978 .

[71]  David Skrbina,et al.  Panpsychism in the West , 2007 .

[72]  Roberto Poli Ontology for Knowledge Organization , 2002 .

[73]  R. Kapp British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1950, Nature.

[74]  Naturdenken beim Kind und bei Aristoteles. Fragen einer genetischen Ontologie , 1982 .

[75]  Thomas M. Dousa,et al.  Evolutionary Order in the Classification Theories of C. A. Cutter & E. C. Richardson: Its Nature and Limits , 2011 .

[76]  Søren Brier,et al.  Information Seen as Part of the Development of Living Intelligence: the Five-Leveled Cybersemiotic Framework for FIS , 2003, Entropy.

[77]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast , 1997 .

[78]  Rick Szostak,et al.  Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science , 2008, J. Documentation.

[79]  Ingetraut Dahlberg,et al.  Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung: Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens , 1974 .