Allowing for non-additively separable and flexible utility forms in multiple discrete-continuous models

Many consumer choice situations are characterized by the simultaneous demand for multiple alternatives that are imperfect substitutes for one another, along with a continuous quantity dimension for each chosen alternative. To model such multiple discrete-continuous choices, most multiple discrete-continuous models in the literature use an additively-separable utility function, with the assumption that the marginal utility of one good is independent of the consumption of another good. In this paper, we develop model formulations for multiple discrete-continuous choices that allow a non-additive utility structure, and accommodate rich substitution structures and complementarity effects in the consumption patterns. Specifically, three different non-additive utility formulations are proposed based on alternative specifications and interpretations of stochasticity: (1) The deterministic utility random maximization (DU-RM) formulation, which considers stochasticity due to the random mistakes consumers make during utility maximization; (2) The random utility deterministic maximization (RU-DM) formulation, which considers stochasticity due to the analyst’s errors in characterizing the consumer’s utility function; and (3) The random utility random maximization (RU-RM) formulation, which considers both analyst’s errors and consumer’s mistakes within a unified framework. When applied to the consumer expenditure survey data in the United States, the proposed DU-RM and RD-DM non-additively separable utility formulations perform better than the additively separable counterparts, and suggest the presence of substitution and complementarity patterns in consumption.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions , 2005 .

[2]  Chandra Bhat,et al.  Computationally efficient forecasting procedures for Kuhn-Tucker consumer demand model systems: Application to residential energy consumption analysis , 2021, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[3]  Rene Roy,et al.  La distribution du revenu entre les divers biens , 1947 .

[4]  F. Norwood,et al.  MODEL SELECTION CRITERIA USING LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS AND OUT-OF-SAMPLE PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[5]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  A Category-Level Model of Asymmetric Complements , 2010 .

[6]  Nitin Mehta Investigating Consumers' Purchase Incidence and Brand Choice Decisions Across Multiple Product Categories: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis , 2007 .

[7]  T. Wales,et al.  Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints☆ , 1983 .

[8]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: A multiple discrete-continuous choice approach , 2008 .

[9]  Functional Forms in Discrete/Continuous Choice Models with General Corner Solutions , 2009 .

[10]  C. Bhat Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences , 2003 .

[11]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  A Direct Utility Model for Market Basket Data , 2009 .

[12]  Klaus Frohberg,et al.  Stochastic Efficiency Measurement: The Curse of Theoretical Consistency , 2006 .

[13]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Do Transportation and Communications Tend to be Substitutes, Complements, or Neither? , 2007 .

[14]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  A Discrete–Continuous Model for Multicategory Purchase Behavior of Households , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand , 2008 .

[16]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of household transportation expenditures relative to other goods and services: an application to United States consumer expenditure data , 2009 .

[17]  R. Pollak,et al.  Demand System Specification and Estimation , 1995 .

[18]  Transportation Expenditures and Ability to Pay: Evidence from Consumer Expenditure Survey , 2006 .

[19]  Donggen Wang,et al.  A two-level multiple discrete-continuous model of time allocation to virtual and physical activities , 2011 .

[20]  C. Bhat The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model : Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions , 2008 .

[21]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Exploring Variation Properties of Time Use Behavior on the Basis of a Multilevel Multiple Discrete–Continuous Extreme Value Model , 2010 .

[22]  P. Thakuriah,et al.  Analysis of Variations in Vehicle Ownership Expenditures , 2005 .

[23]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  Economics and consumer behavior , 1980 .

[24]  Larry G. Epstein Integrability of Incomplete Systems of Demand Functions , 1982 .

[25]  Incomplete Demand Systems, Corner Solutions, and Welfare Measurement , 2010 .

[26]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions , 1975 .

[27]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety , 2002 .

[28]  Sangho Choo,et al.  Relationships Between US Consumer Expenditures on Communications and Transportation Using Almost Ideal Demand System Modeling: 1984–2002 , 2007 .

[29]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of Households , 1993 .

[30]  Devajyoti Deka,et al.  Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation , 2004 .

[31]  W. Hanemann Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand , 1984 .

[32]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Functional Forms in Discrete/Continuous Choice Models With General Corner Solution , 2008 .