Reinforced concrete seismically-excited frame design with a new mixed $$\varvec{H}_2/\varvec{H}_{\infty }$$H2/H∞ optimization approach

A new approach is proposed for the optimal design of seismically excited reinforced concrete frames. Unlike most existing methods that do not exploit the input/output relationship between the base acceleration and the structural response, the main feature of the presented approach is to directly shape the input/output transfer function so as to reduce the dynamic amplification factors that govern the structural response. The approach is general with respect to distinctive issues: on the one side the structural output may encompass different quantities of engineering interest such as the overall compliance, the lateral displacement of a representative point (typically the averaged top-storey displacement) and the interstorey drift vector, on the other two system norms may be considered (or a combination thereof) as to the transfer-function amplitude to be minimized, namely the $$H_{\infty }$$H∞-norm and the $$H_2$$H2-norm. The former allows to reduce the peak-gain response whereas the latter the squared power energy of the response. By cleverly combining the two, typically by means of a convex combination, one may end up with significant peak gain as well as power response reduction. A numerical investigation on a 2D frame is conducted to validate the theoretical framework that is modeled following Eurocode 8 (CEN in Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Standard EN 1998-1, Brussels (2004)) in medium ductility class (DCM) but the method applies to any regulations including modern displacement based codes such as the fib Model Code 2010 (Bulletins Nos. 65/66, Federation Internationale du Beton, Lausanne 2012).

[1]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  A bisection method for computing the H∞ norm of a transfer matrix and related problems , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[2]  Chun Man Chan,et al.  An optimal resizing technique for seismic drift design of concrete buildings subjected to response spectrum and time history loadings , 2005 .

[3]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Seismic design of RC structures: A critical assessment in the framework of multi‐objective optimization , 2007 .

[4]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design of Concrete Buildings to Eurocode 8 , 2015 .

[5]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[6]  M. Steinbuch,et al.  A fast algorithm to computer the H ∞ -norm of a transfer function matrix , 1990 .

[7]  Zhongguo John Ma,et al.  Design recommendations for achieving “strong column-weak beam” in RC frames , 2016 .

[8]  Michael L. Overton,et al.  Fast Approximation of the HINFINITY Norm via Optimization over Spectral Value Sets , 2013, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[9]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .

[10]  Tsionis Georgios,et al.  Eurocode 8: Seismic Design of Buildings - Worked examples , 2012 .

[11]  Panagiotis E. Mergos,et al.  Optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete frames according to Eurocode 8 and fib Model Code 2010 , 2017 .

[12]  Marco Pingaro,et al.  A new approach to optimization of viscoelastic beams: minimization of the input/output transfer function H∞$\boldsymbol {H}_{\infty }$-norm , 2016 .

[13]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Evaluation of factors influencing the earthquake-resistant design of reinforced concrete frames according to Eurocode 8 , 2016 .

[14]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Performance‐ and displacement‐based seismic design and assessment of concrete structures in fib Model Code 2010 , 2013 .

[15]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[16]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[17]  Tim Mitchell,et al.  A BFGS-SQP method for nonsmooth, nonconvex, constrained optimization and its evaluation using relative minimization profiles , 2017, Optim. Methods Softw..

[18]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[19]  Marco Pingaro,et al.  An innovative H∞–norm based worst case scenario approach for dynamic compliance optimization with applications to viscoelastic beams , 2017 .

[20]  R. Melchers,et al.  Reliability of ductility requirements in concrete design codes , 2016 .

[21]  Daniel P. Giesy,et al.  H-infinity norm sensitivity formula with control system design applications , 1993 .